Journals / Ulusal Travma ve Acil Cerrahi Dergisi / 2016 / Cilt: 22 - Sayı: 3

Where should the damage control surgery be performed, at the nearest health center or at a fully equipped hospital?

Pages
273–277
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

In this way, acidosis, hypothermia, and coagulopathy can be prevented, and the risk of mortality can be reduced

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:BACKGROUND: Transport of casualties from a combat area to a fully equipped hospital where all techniques of damage control surgery (DCS) can be performed requires a great deal of time.
📊
Key Findings & Data:The aim of the present study was to investigate the effect of the location at which DCS was performed on rates of mortality.METHODS: The present retrospective study included 51 combat casualties who underwent DCS at the present clinic or at hospitals nearest the combat area due to high kinetic energy gunshot injuries to the abdomen between 2010 and 2015.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:In this way, acidosis, hypothermia, and coagulopathy can be prevented, and the risk of mortality can be reduced
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:2010 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Transport of casualties from a combat area to a fully equipped hospital where all techniques of damage control surgery (DCS) can be performed requires a great deal of time. Therefore, prior to transport, prompt control of hemorrhage and contamination should be achieved, and resuscitative procedures should be performed at the nearest health center. The aim of the present study was to investigate the effect of the location at which DCS was performed on rates of mortality.METHODS: The present retrospective study included 51 combat casualties who underwent DCS at the present clinic or at hospitals nearest the combat area due to high kinetic energy gunshot injuries to the abdomen between 2010 and 2015. Patients were evaluated in terms of acidosis, hypothermia, coagulopathy, and mortality.RESULTS: Patients were divided into 2 groups depending on the location where the first step of DCS was performed: (1) at the present hospital or (2) at other hospitals. Group 1 comprised 26 patients (51%), and Group 2 comprised 25 (49%). Total mortality occurred in 23 (45.1%) patients, including 15 (57.7%) patients in Group 1 and 8 (32%) in Group 2. In Group 1, mean time from injury to hospital admission was longer, and deep acidosis, hypothermia, and coagulopathy were more marked.CONCLUSION: Initial surgical control of hemorrhage and contamination in patients injured by high kinetic gunshots should be promptly achieved at the nearest health center. In this way, acidosis, hypothermia, and coagulopathy can be prevented, and the risk of mortality can be reduced

🔖

Cite This Article

UĞUR, M., AKKÜÇÜK, S., KOCA, Y. S., ORUÇ, C., AYDOĞAN, A., KILIÇ, E., YETİM, İ., TEMİZ, M. (2016). Where should the damage control surgery be performed, at the nearest health center or at a fully equipped hospital?. Ulusal Travma ve Acil Cerrahi Dergisi, Cilt: 22 - Sayı: 3, 273–277. https://ajindex.com/articles/323759

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (17)

  1. Stagnitti F. Uncontrolled bleeding in patients with major abdominal trauma. Ann Ital Chir 2013;84:365
  2. Eiseman B, Moore EE, Meldrum DR, Raeburn C. Feasibility of damage control surgery in the management of military combat casualties. Arch Surg 2000;135:1323–7
  3. Giannou C, Baldan M. First aid in armed conflict. In: Giannou C, BaldanM, eds. War surgery: working with limited resources in armed conflict and other situations of violence. Vol
  4. Geneva: International Committee of the Red Cross 2010:153–61
  5. Nicol AJ, Hommes M, Primrose R, Navsaria PH, Krige JE. Packing for control of hemorrhage in major liver trauma. World J Surg 2007;31:569– 74
  6. Aydin U, Yazici P, Zeytunlu M, Coker A. Is it more dangerous to perform inadequate packing? World J Emerg Surg 2008;3:1
  7. Kouraklis G, Spirakos S, Glinavou A. Damage control surgery: an alternative approach for the management of critically injured patients. Surg Today 2002;32:195–202
  8. Rotondo MF, Zonies DH. The damage control sequence and underlying logic. Surg Clin North Am. 1997;77:761–77
  9. Matsumoto H, Mashiko K, Sakamoto Y, Kutsukata N, Hara Y, Yokota H. A new look at criteria for damage control surgery. J Nippon Med Sch 2010;77:13–20
  10. Hoey BA, Schwab CW. Damage control surgery. Scand J Surg 2002;91:92–103
  11. Rotondo MF, Schwab CW, McGonigal MD, Phillips GR 3rd, Fruchterman TM, Kauder DR, et al. ‘Damage control’: an approach for improved survival in exsanguinating penetrating abdominal injury. J Trauma 1993;35:375–83
  12. Borgman MA, Spinella PC, Perkins JG, Grathwohl KW, Repine T, Beekley AC, et al. The ratio of blood products transfused affects mortality in patients receiving massive transfusions at a combat support hospital. J Trauma 2007;63:805–13
  13. Byers R. An upshot of war - damage control resuscitation. Int Emerg Nurs 2010;18:221–5
  14. Sirieix D, Delayance S, Paris M, Massonnet-Castel S, Carpentier A, Baron JF. Tris-hydroxymethyl aminomethane and sodium bicarbonate to buffer metabolic acidosis in an isolated heart model. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 1997;155:957–63
  15. Kapan M, Onder A, Oguz A, Taskesen F, Aliosmanoglu I, Gul M, et al. The effective risk factors on mortality in patients undergoing damage control surgery. Eur Rev Med Pharmacol Sci 2013;17:1681–7
  16. Moore EE, Cogbill TH, Malangoni MA, Jurkovich GJ, Shackford SR, Champion HR, et al. Organ injury scaling. Surg Clin North Am 1995;75:293–303
  17. Sharp KW, Locicero RJ. Abdominal packing for surgically uncontrollable he