Journals / İşletme Araştırmaları Dergisi / 2019 / Cilt: 11 - Sayı: 4

Factors Affecting Usage Intention of Mobile Banking: Empirical Evidence from Turkey

Pages
2384–2395
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Results – Research findings revealed that trust and quality factors are highly associ-ated with intention to use mobile banking.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Purpose – Even conventional banking transactions were hard to leave for bank cus-tomers, due to the convenience of mobile banking, banking technologies have changed dramatically.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Furthermore, intention to use decreases the perceived risk and increases the perceived benefit.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Results – Research findings revealed that trust and quality factors are highly associ-ated with intention to use mobile banking.
🔬Design:Survey & Empirical Study
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Özet

Purpose – Even conventional banking transactions were hard to leave for bank cus-tomers, due to the convenience of mobile banking, banking technologies have changed dramatically. Mobile banking technology adoption was late in Turkey; however it showed a much more rapid progress in comparison with developed countries. In this study, it is aimed to examine the effect of trust and service quality on mobile banking usage intention. Also, the effect of usage intention on perceived risk and benefit is in-tended to reveal. Design/methodology/approach – The data is collected from the individuals who benefit from the banking services in Turkey. Bank customers who live in different regions of Turkey constitute the sample of the study. The research data was collected by survey and convenience sampling is used as a sampling method. Structural Equation Modeling has been used as a research method and data were tested in terms of validity and reliability through data confirmatory factor analysis. Results – Research findings revealed that trust and quality factors are highly associ-ated with intention to use mobile banking. Furthermore, intention to use decreases the perceived risk and increases the perceived benefit. Discussion – Banks should pay attention on mobile banking security system to increase the number of mobile banking users. Also, service quality such as ease-of-use, visual appeal and information relevancy helps them to create mobile banking usage intention. Moreover, customers’ mobile banking usage intention has an impact on perceived ben-efit and perceived risk that it lessens perceived risk and increases perceived benefit.

🔖

Cite This Article

ERDEM, A., PALA, U., ÖZKAN, M., SEVİM, U. (2019). Factors Affecting Usage Intention of Mobile Banking: Empirical Evidence from Turkey. İşletme Araştırmaları Dergisi, Cilt: 11 - Sayı: 4, 2384–2395. https://ajindex.com/articles/268815

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (14)

  1. Akın, F. & Karaboga,. K. (2011). Bireysel müşterilerin şubesiz bankacılık hizmetlerini kullanma kararına etki eden faktörlerin belirlenmesi üzerine bir araştırma: Bilecik örneği. Marmara Üniversitesi İİBF Dergisi, 30(1), 301-320.
  2. Akturan, U., & Tezcan, N. (2012). Mobile banking adoption of the youth market: Perceptions and intentions. Marketing Intelligence & Planning, 30(4), 444-459.
  3. Alalwan, A. A., Dwivedi, Y. K., & Rana, N. P. (2017). Factors influencing adoption of mobile banking by Jordanian bank customers: Extending UTAUT2 with trust. International Journal of Information Management, 37(3), 99-110.
  4. Albashrawi, M., & Motiwalla, L. (2017). Privacy and Personalization in Continued Usage Intention of Mobile Banking: An Integrative Perspective. Information Systems Frontiers, 1-13.
  5. Anderson, J. C., & Gerbing, D. W. (1988). Structural equation modeling in practice: A review and recommended two-step approach. Psychological bulletin, 103(3), 411-423.
  6. Bauer, R. A. (1960). Consumer behavior as risk taking. Risk taking and ınformation handling in consumer behavior. Boston: Boston University Press.
  7. Bayram, N. (2010). Yapısal eşitlik modellemesine giriş: Amos uygulamaları (1. Baskı). Bursa: Ezgi Kitabevi.
  8. Brown, I., Cajee, Z., Davies, D., & Stroebel, S. (2003). Cell phone banking: predictors of adoption in South Africa—an exploratory study. International Journal of Information Management, 23(5), 381-394.
  9. Byrne, B. M. (1998). Structural equation modeling with LISREL, PRELIS, and SIMPLIS: Basic concepts, applications, and programming: New Jersey: L. Erlbaum Associates. Çapık, C. (2014). Geçerlik ve güvenirlik çalışmalarında doğrulayıcı faktör analizinin kullanımı. Anadolu Hemşirelik ve Sağlık Bilimleri Dergisi, 17(3), 196-205.
  10. Çokluk, Ö., Şekercioğlu, G., & Büyüköztürk, Ş. (2010). Sosyal bilimler için çok değişkenli istatistik: SPSS ve Lisrel uygulamaları (1. Baskı). Ankara:
  11. Pegem Akademi. Goh, T.-T., & Sun, S. (2014). Exploring gender differences in Islamic mobile banking acceptance. Electronic Commerce Research, 14(4), 435-458.
  12. Gu, J.-C., Lee, S.-C., & Suh, Y.-H. (2009). Determinants of behavioral intention to mobile banking. Expert Systems with Applications, 36(9), 11605-11616.
  13. Hanafizadeh, P., Behboudi, M., Abedini Koshksaray, A., & Jalilvand Shirkhani Tabar, M. (2014). Mobile-banking adoption by Iranian bank clients. Telematics and Informatics, 31(1), 62-78.
  14. Kesharwani, A., & Singh Bisht, S. (2012). The impact of trust and perceived risk on internet banking adop