Journals / Ulusal Travma ve Acil Cerrahi Dergisi / 2016 / Cilt: 22 - Sayı: 5

Penetran keratoplasti sonrası travmatik yara ayrılması

Traumatic wound dehiscence after penetrating keratoplasty

Pages
437–440
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

In order to prevent this catastrophic condition, patients should be warned against ocular trauma after undergoing PK.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:BACKGROUND: The aim of this study was to evaluate risks and consequences of traumatic wound dehiscence after penetrating keratoplasty (PK).METHODS: Data regarding 34 eyes of 34 patients who were treated for traumatic wound dehiscence after PK between 1995 and 2014 were studied.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Patient records were reviewed for type and time of insult, corrected distance visual acuity (CDVA), clinical presentation signs, operative method, and outcome.RESULTS: The interval between PK and trauma ranged from 1 month to 100 months, with median of 14 months.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:In order to prevent this catastrophic condition, patients should be warned against ocular trauma after undergoing PK.
🔬Design:Review & Systematic Survey
📍Scope:2014 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The aim of this study was to evaluate risks and consequences of traumatic wound dehiscence after penetrating keratoplasty (PK).METHODS: Data regarding 34 eyes of 34 patients who were treated for traumatic wound dehiscence after PK between 1995 and 2014 were studied. Patient records were reviewed for type and time of insult, corrected distance visual acuity (CDVA), clinical presentation signs, operative method, and outcome.RESULTS: The interval between PK and trauma ranged from 1 month to 100 months, with median of 14 months. Median age at trauma was 31.5 years (range: 5-81 years). Wound dehiscence occurred at donor-recipient interface in all patients. In 58.8% of patients, extent of dehiscence was >=6 clock hours. Most frequent type of trauma was blunt trauma by hand/finger (35.2%). Median CDVA before and just after trauma were 0.5 logMAR (range: 0.1-3.0 logMAR) and 3.0 logMAR (range: 0.7-3.0 logMAR), respectively. Wound dehiscence was managed with primary wound closure in all patients. Most frequent additional surgical procedure was anterior vitrectomy (26.4%). Anatomical globe loss occurred in 2 patients. Median CDVA was 0.7 logMAR (range: 0.1-3.0 logMAR) at final visit. Most common complication after primary suturation was graft failure (23.5%). Graft remained clear in 67.6% of patients.CONCLUSION: Traumatic wound dehiscence is one of the potentially devastating postoperative complications that can occur following PK. Prognosis depends on existence and severity of additional anterior/posterior segment damage. In order to prevent this catastrophic condition, patients should be warned against ocular trauma after undergoing PK.

Özet

AMAÇ: Bu çalışmanın amacı penetran keratoplasti sonrası oluşan travmatik yara ayrılmasının risklerini ve olası sonuçlarını değerlendirmektir.GEREÇ VE YÖNTEM: Çalışmaya kliniğimizde 1995-2014 yılları arasında penetran keratoplasti sonrası travmatik yara ayrılması gelişen 34 hastanın 34 gözü dahil edilmiştir. Hastaların kayıtları, travmanın tipi ve zamanı, en iyi düzeltilmiş görme keskinliği (EİDGK), başvuru anındaki bulgular, uygula-nan cerrahi girişim ve sonuçları açısından incelendi.BULGULAR: Penetran keratoplasti cerrahisi ve travma arasında geçen süre bir ay ile 100 ay arasında değişmekle beraber median 14 aydı. Travma sırasındaki median yaş, 31.5 (5-81) yıldı. Tüm hastalarda yara ayrılması, donör-alıcı ara yüzünde meydana gelmişti. Hastaların %58.8'inde ayrılmanın büyüklüğü, altı saat kadranı veya daha genişti. En sık travma, parmak veya elle olan künt travmaydı (%35.2). En iyi düzeltilmiş görme keskinliği median değeri, travma öncesinde 0.5 logMAR (0.1-3.0), travmadan hemen sonraki muayenede ise 3.0 logMAR (0.7-3.0) idi. Yara ayrılması, tüm hastalarda primer sütürasyon ile tamir edildi. En sık uygulanan ilave cerrahi prosedür, ön vitrektomiydi (%26.4). İki hastada anatomik glob kaybı meydana geldi. Son vizitte, EİDGK median değeri 0.7 logMAR (0.1-3.0) idi. Primer sütürasyon sonrası en sık rastlanan komplikasyon greft yetmezliğiydi (%23.5). Hastaların %67.6'sında greft saydamdı.TARTIŞMA: Travmatik yara ayrılması, penetran keratoplasti sonrası ortaya çıkabilen en yıkıcı komplikasyonlardandır. Prognoz, eşlik eden ön ve arka segment hasarlanmasına bağlıdır. Bu kötü durumdan korunmak amacıyla penetran kornea nakli geçiren hastalar, cerrahi sonrası olası göz travmala-rına karşı uyarılmalıdır.

🔖

Cite This Article

SELVER, Ö. B., PALAMAR, M., EĞRİLMEZ, S., YAĞCI, A. (2016). Penetran keratoplasti sonrası travmatik yara ayrılması. Ulusal Travma ve Acil Cerrahi Dergisi, Cilt: 22 - Sayı: 5, 437–440. https://ajindex.com/articles/323748

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (16)

  1. Bowman RJ, Yorston D, Aitchison TC, McIntyre B, Kirkness CM. Trau- matic wound rupture after penetrating keratoplasty in Africa. Br J Oph- thalmol 1999;83:530-4.
  2. Farley MK, Pettit TH. Traumatic wound dehiscence after penetrating keratoplasty. Am J Ophthalmol 1987;104:44-9.
  3. Raber IM, Arentsen JJ, Laibson PR. Traumatic wound dehiscence after penetrating keratoplasty. Arch Ophthalmol 1980;98:1407-9.
  4. Agrawal V, Wagh M, Krishnamachary M, Rao GN, Gupta S. Traumatic wound dehiscence after penetrating keratoplasty. Cornea 1995;14:601-3.
  5. Elder MJ, Stack RR. Globe rupture following penetrating keratoplasty: how often, why, and what can we do to prevent it? Cornea 2004;23:776- 80. Rehany U, Rumelt S. Ocular trauma following penetrating keratoplasty: incidence, outcome, and postoperative recommendations. Arch Ophthal- mol 1998;116:1282-6.
  6. Tseng SH, Lin SC, Chen FK. Traumatic wound dehiscence after pen- etrating keratoplasty: clinical features and outcome in 21 cases. Cornea 1999;18:553,8. Kartal B, Kandemir B, Set T, Kugu S, Keles S, Ceylan E, et al. Traumatic wound dehiscence after penetrating keratoplasty. Ulus Travma Acil Cer- rahi Derg 2014;20:181-8.
  7. Rohrbach JM, Weidle EG, Steuhl KP, Meilinger S, Pleyer U. Traumatic wound dehiscence after penetrating keratoplasty. Acta Ophthalmol Scand 1996;74:501-5.
  8. Lam FC, Rahman MQ, Ramaesh K. Traumatic wound dehiscence after penetrating keratoplasty-a cause for concern. Eye (Lond) 2007;21:1146- 50. Gasset AR, Dohlman CH. The tensile strength of corneal wounds. Arch Ophthalmol 1968;79:595-602.
  9. Perry HD, Donnenfeld ED. Expulsive choroidal hemorrhage follow- ing suture removal after penetrating keratoplasty. Am J Ophthalmol 1988;106:99-100.
  10. Brown SI, Tragakis MP. Wound dehiscence with keratoplasty: com- plication of the continuous-suture technique. Am J Ophthalmol 1971;72:115-6.
  11. Binder PS, Abel R Jr, Polack FM, Kaufman HE. Keratoplasty wound separations. Am J Ophthalmol 1975;80:109-15.
  12. Gliedman ML, Karlson KE. Wound healing and wound strength of su- tured limbal wounds. Am J Ophthalmol 1955;39:859-66.
  13. Topping TM, Stark WJ, Maumenee E, Kenyon KR. Traumatic wound dehiscence following penetrating keratoplasty. Br J Ophthalmol 1982;66:174-8.
  14. Pettinelli DJ, Starr CE, Stark WJ. Late traumatic corneal wound dehis- cence after penetrating keratoplasty. Arch Ophthalmol 2005;123:853-6.
  15. Egrilmez S, Uzunel UD, Yagci A. Ocular Trauma Following Keratoplas- ty. MN Ophthalmology 2004;11:200-4.
  16. Elder MJ, Stack RR. Globe rupture following penetra