Journals / Ulusal Travma ve Acil Cerrahi Dergisi / 2017 / Cilt: 23 - Sayı: 1

Percutaneous cholecystostomy: A curative treatment modality forelderly & high ASA score acute cholecystitis patients

Pages
34–38
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

After removal of PC drain, LC may be performed with acceptable conversion rate of 18.8%.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:BACKGROUND: Acute cholecystitis (AC) is a common emergency seen by general surgeons.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Presently described is experience and results with PC in high risk, elderly patients with AC.METHODS: Medical records of all consecutive patients who underwent PC between January 2011 and January 2014 were identified.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:After removal of PC drain, LC may be performed with acceptable conversion rate of 18.8%.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:2011 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Acute cholecystitis (AC) is a common emergency seen by general surgeons. Optimal treatment is laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC); however, in cases where surgery cannot be performed due to high risk of morbidity and mortality, such as in elderly patients with comorbid diseases, other treatment modalities may be used. Percutaneous cholecystostomy (PC) is one alternative method to treat AC. PC can be used to provide drainage of the gall bladder and control infection. Subsequently, interval cholecystectomy can be performed when there are better conditions. Presently described is experience and results with PC in high risk, elderly patients with AC.METHODS: Medical records of all consecutive patients who underwent PC between January 2011 and January 2014 were identified. Tokyo Guidelines were used for definitive diagnosis and severity assessment of AC. Senior surgeon elected to perform PC based on higher risk-benefit ratio due to comorbidity, age, or duration of symptoms. All PC procedures were performed by the same interventional radiologist under local anesthesia with ultrasonographic guidance.RESULTS: Total of 40 PC procedures were performed during the study period. Of those, 22 (55%) were male and 18 were (45%) were female, with median age of 70.5 years (range: 52-87 years). All of the patients had American Society of Anesthesiologists classification of either 3 or 4. Success rate of PC was 100% with complication rate of 2.5% (n=1). One patient was operated on shortly after PC procedure due to bile peritonitis complication. PC drains were kept in place for 6 weeks. Total of 16 patients (40%) had surgery following removal of PC drain. In 3 (18.8%) cases, conversion from LC was required. Remaining 23 (57.5%) patients did not have subsequent operation after drain removal. No disease recurrence was observed in follow-up. CONCLUSION: When elderly patients present in emergency setting with AC and LC cannot be performed due to comorbid disease or poor general condition, PC can be performed safely. After removal of PC drain, LC may be performed with acceptable conversion rate of 18.8%.

🔖

Cite This Article

TOLAN, H. K., OYSU, A. S., BAŞAK, F., ATAK, İ., OZBAGRİACİK, M., ÖZPEK, A., KASKAL, M., EZBERCİ, F., BAŞ, G. (2017). Percutaneous cholecystostomy: A curative treatment modality forelderly & high ASA score acute cholecystitis patients. Ulusal Travma ve Acil Cerrahi Dergisi, Cilt: 23 - Sayı: 1, 34–38. https://ajindex.com/articles/323684

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (14)

  1. Keus F, Gooszen HG, van Laarhoven CJ. Open, small-incision, or laparoscopic cholecystectomy for patients with symptomatic cholecystolithiasis. An overview of Cochrane Hepato-Biliary Group reviews. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2010;1:CD008318
  2. Glenn F. Cholecystectomy in the high-risk patient with biliary tract disease. Ann Surg 1977;185:185-91
  3. Edlund G, Ljungdahl M. Acute cholecystitis in the elderly. Am J Surg 1990;159:414-6
  4. Lai PB, Kwong KH, Leung KL, Kwok SP, Chan AC, Chung SC, et al. Randomized trial of early versus delayed laparoscopic cholecystectomy for acute cholecystitis. Br J Surg 1998;85:764-7
  5. Alponat A, Kum CK, Koh BC, Rajnakova A, Goh PM. Predictive factors for conversion of laparoscopic cholecystectomy. World J Surg 1997;21:629-33
  6. Winbladh A, Gullstrand P, Svanvik J, Sandström P. Systematic review of cholecystostomy as a treatment option in acute cholecystitis. HPB (Oxford) 2009;11:183-93
  7. Hirota M, Takada T, Kawarada Y, Nimura Y, Miura F, Hirata K, et al. Diagnostic criteria and severity assessment of acute cholecystitis: Tokyo Guidelines. J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Surg 2007;14:78-82
  8. Owens WD, Felts JA, Spitznagel EL Jr. ASA physical status classifications: a study of consistency of ratings. Anesthesiology 1978;49:239-43
  9. Berber E, Engle KL, String A, Garland AM, Chang G, Macho J, et al. Selective use of tube cholecystostomy with interval laparoscopic cholecystectomy in acute cholecystitis. Arch Surg 2000;135:341-6
  10. Patterson EJ, McLoughlin RF, Mathieson JR, Cooperberg PL, MacFarlane JK. An alternative approach to acute cholecystitis. Percutaneous cholecystostomy and interval laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Surg Endosc 1996;10:1185-8
  11. Chang YR, Ahn YJ, Jang JY, Kang MJ, Kwon W, Jung WH, et al. Percutaneous cholecystostomy for acute cholecystitis in patients with high comorbidity and re-evaluation of treatment efficacy. Surgery 2014;155:615-22
  12. Wang CH, Wu CY, Yang JC, Lien WC, Wang HP, Liu KL, et al. Long-Term Outcomes of Patients with Acute Cholecystitis after Successful Percutaneous Cholecystostomy Treatment and the Risk Factors for Recurrence: A Decade Experience at a Single Center. PLoS One 2016;11:e0148017
  13. Popowicz A, Lundell L, Gerber P, Gustafsson U, Pieniowski E, Sinabulya H, et al. Cholecystostomy as Bridge to Surgery and as Definitive Treatment or Acute Cholecystectomy in Patients with Acute Cholecystitis. Gastroenterol Res Pract 2016;2016:3672416
  14. Yeo CS, Tay VW, Low JK, Woon WW, Pun