Journals / Uluslararası Güvenlik ve Terörizm Dergisi / 2013 / Cilt: 4 - Sayı: 1

İstihbarat-destekli polislik: Suç istihbaratı analizinin karar vermeye etkisi

Intelligence - led policing: How the use of crime intelligence analysis translates in to the decision-making

Pages
21–40
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

The findings indicate that intelligence analysis, crime analysis, and statistical analysis functions are consistently associated with all of the organizational decision-making variables.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:This study does a partial test of a new policing model, the 3-i model of intelligence-led policing (ILP).
📊
Key Findings & Data:It is a business model and a managerial philosophy where data analysis is critical to the decision-making process when dealing with crime and criminals proactively and reactively.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:The findings indicate that intelligence analysis, crime analysis, and statistical analysis functions are consistently associated with all of the organizational decision-making variables.
🔬Design:Modeling & Simulation
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

This study does a partial test of a new policing model, the 3-i model of intelligence-led policing (ILP). It is a business model and a managerial philosophy where data analysis is critical to the decision-making process when dealing with crime and criminals proactively and reactively. To explore the research questions, a comprehensive data set was constructed using four nationwide data sets in the U.S.A. The findings indicate that intelligence analysis, crime analysis, and statistical analysis functions are consistently associated with all of the organizational decision-making variables. In addition, having a crime analysis unit in a law enforcement agency matters in terms of decision-making.

Özet

Bu çalışma yeni bir polislik modeli olan İstihbarat-Destekli Polisliğin 3-i versiyonunu kısmi olarak test etmektedir. Bu yeni polislik, suç ve suçlularla proaktif ve reaktif olarak mücadelede kullanılan, karar verme sürecinde veri analizinin önemli olduğu, bir iş modeli ve yönetim felsefesidir. Araştırma soruları, ABD’de toplanan dört farklı ulusal veri setinin bir araya getirilmesiyle oluşturulan, kapsamlı bir veri bankasından araştırılarak yanıtlanmaktadır. Araştırma bulguları, istihbarat analizi, suç analizi ve istatistik analizi fonksiyonlarının tüm organizasyon seviyesindeki karar verme değişkenleriyle ilintili olduğunu ortaya koymuştur. Ayrıca, bir kolluk kuvveti müdürlüğünde suç analizi biriminin bulunmasının o müdürlüğün karar verme süresine etkisinin olduğu tespit edilmiştir.

🔖

Cite This Article

GÜL, Z., KULE, A. (2013). İstihbarat-destekli polislik: Suç istihbaratı analizinin karar vermeye etkisi. Uluslararası Güvenlik ve Terörizm Dergisi, Cilt: 4 - Sayı: 1, 21–40. https://ajindex.com/articles/323392

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (4)

  1. Agresti, A. (2002). Categorical data analysis. (2nd ed.). Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons. Aldrich, J. H., & Nelson, F. D. (1984). Linear probability, logit, and probit models. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage Anderson, R. (1997). Intelligence-Led Policing: a British Perspective. In A. Smith (Ed.), Intelligence-led policing: International perspectives on in the 21st century policing (pp. 5-8).
  2. Lawrenceville, NJ: International Association of Law Enforcement Intelligence Analysts. Audit Commission. (1993). Helping With Enquiries: Tackling Crime Effectively. London: HMSO. Baker, T. E. (2009). Intelligence-led policing: Leadership, strategies, and tactics. Flushing, NY: Looseleaf Law Publications. Baumgartner, F. R., & Jones, B. D. (1993). Agendas and instability in American politics. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
  3. Bratton, W. J. (1998). Crime is down in New York City: Blame the police. In W. J. Bratton & N. Dennis (Eds.), Zero tolerance: Policing a free society (2nd edition, pp. 29-43). London: Institute of Economic Affairs Health and Welfare Unit. Buck, G. A. (1973). Police crime analysis unit handbook. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Justice, Law Enforcement Assistance Administration. Bureau of Justice Statistics (2008). Law Enforcement Management and Administrative Statistics (LEMAS): 2000 Sample Survey of Law Enforcement Agencies [Computer file], ICPSR version. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Commerce, Bureau of the Census. Ann Arbor, MI: Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [producer and distributor]. Bureau of Justice Statistics. (2004). Law enforcement agency identifiers crosswalk [United States], 2000 [Data file] (ICPSR ed.). Ann Arbor, MI: Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [producer and distributor]. Cope, N. (2004). Intelligence Led Policing or Policing Led Intelligence?: Integrating Volume Crime Analysis into Policing. British Journal of Criminology, 44(2), 188-203.
  4. Demir, S. (2009). Diffusion of police technology across time and space and the impact of technology use on police effectiveness and its contribution to decision-making. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Kent State University, Kent, OH. Frankfort-Nachmias, C., & Nachmias, D. (2000). Research methods in the social sciences. [6th ed.] New York: Worth Publishers. Federal Bureau of Investigation. Uniform Crime Reporting (UCR) Summary Reporting, Frequently Asked Questions. Retrieved July 23, 2008, from http://www.fbi.gov/ ucr/ucrque