Journals / Uluslararası Hematoloji-Onkoloji Dergisi / 2010 / Cilt: 20 - Sayı: 3

Görüntüleme yöntemleri kılavuzluğunda subkutan venöz port implantasyonu: tek merkez deneyimi

Subcutaneous venous port ımplantation under guidance of ımaging methods: single centre experience

Pages
148–155
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Due to low rates of perioper- ative and early term complication, if there are qualified staff and adequate equipment, technique of subcutaneous venous port placement under guidance of imaging method should be preferred instead of landmark technique.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:The aim of this study is to present our experience about subcutaneous venous ports placed under guidance of imaging method.
📊
Key Findings & Data:In this study, the records of interventional radiology unit were reviewed and 150 consecutive subjects, who under- went subcutaneous venous port implantation under guidance of imaging methods between the dates of 01.03.2007 and 04.09.2008 were presented.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Due to low rates of perioper- ative and early term complication, if there are qualified staff and adequate equipment, technique of subcutaneous venous port placement under guidance of imaging method should be preferred instead of landmark technique.
🔬Design:Review & Systematic Survey
📍Scope:2007 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

The aim of this study is to present our experience about subcutaneous venous ports placed under guidance of imaging method. In this study, the records of interventional radiology unit were reviewed and 150 consecutive subjects, who under- went subcutaneous venous port implantation under guidance of imaging methods between the dates of 01.03.2007 and 04.09.2008 were presented. Patients were evaluated in terms of technical success, perioperative and late term complica- tions. Thecnical success was 100%. None of the subjects had perioperative (first 30 days) complication. During long term follow-up, 3 subjects had skin necrosis and 4 subjects had infection related with catheter (2.6%). Rate of catheter sepsis calculated ad 1.3%. Complication which required extraction of port (skin necrosis, infection) occurred in 7 subjects (4.6%). One hundred and twenty one (121) of the patients are still alive and their ports are functional. Due to low rates of perioper- ative and early term complication, if there are qualified staff and adequate equipment, technique of subcutaneous venous port placement under guidance of imaging method should be preferred instead of landmark technique.

Özet

Bu çalışmanın amacı, ünitemizde görüntüleme kılavuzlu¤unda yerleştirilen subkutan venöz portlar ile ilgili deneyimlerimizi ve sonuçlarımızı sunmaktır. Bu çalışmada girişimsel radyoloji bölümü kayıtları incelenerek 01.03.2007 ile 04.09.2008 tarihleri arasında görüntüleme yöntemleri kılavuzluğunda subkutan venöz port implantasyonu işlemi uygulanan, sıralı 150 olgu incelenmiştir. Teknik başarı, perioperatif ve geç dönem komplikasyonlar açısından dğğerlendirilen olgularda, teknik başarı %100 olarak gerçekleşti. Hiç bir olguda perioperatif (ilk 30 gün) komplikasyon izlenmedi. Hiçbir olgumuzda kateter disfonksiyonu gelişmedi. Uzun dönem izlemlerde 3 olguda deri nekrozu, 4 olgumuzda kateter ile ilişkili enfeksiyon( % 2.6 ) saptandı. Kateter sepsis oranı %1.3 olarak hesaplandı. 7 olguda portun çıkartılmasını gerektiren komplikasyon (deri nekrozu, enfeksiyon) gelişti (%4.6). Hastaların 121 tanesi hala hayatta olup portları fonksiyoneldir. Görüntüleme kılavuzluğunda uygulanan subkütan venöz port yerleştirme tekniği, landmark tekniğe göre, perioperatif ve erken dönem komplikasyon oranlarının düşüklüğü nedeniyle, deneyimli ekip ve yeterli ekipman varsa öncelikle tercih edilmelidir.

🔖

Cite This Article

DOĞAN, N., INECIKLI, M. F., ELLERGEZEN, S., EVRENSEL, T., ERDOĞAN, C. (2010). Görüntüleme yöntemleri kılavuzluğunda subkutan venöz port implantasyonu: tek merkez deneyimi. Uluslararası Hematoloji-Onkoloji Dergisi, Cilt: 20 - Sayı: 3, 148–155. https://ajindex.com/articles/322937

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (15)

  1. Niederhuber JE, Ensminger W, Gyves JW, et al. Totally implanted venous and arterial access system to repla ce external catheter in cancer treatment. Surgery 92: 706-712, 1982
  2. Morris SL, Jacques PF, Mauro MA. Radiology-assis ted placement of implantable subcutaneous infusion ports for longterm venous access. Radiology 184: 149-151, 1992
  3. Funaki B. Central Venous Access: A Primer for the di agnostic radiologist. AJR 179: 309-318, 2002
  4. Çil BE, Canyiğit M, Peynircioğlu B, et al. Subcutaneous venous port implantation in adult patients: a single center experience. Diagn Interv Radiol 12: 93-98, 2006
  5. Laméris JS, Post PJ, Zonderland HM, et al. Per cutaneous placement of Hickman catheters: Com parison of sonographically guided and blind tech niques. AJR 155: 1097-1099, 1990
  6. Sandhu J. Techniques for conventional access to central veins. Tech Vasc Interv Radiol 1: 125- 132,1998
  7. Karakitsos D, Labropoulos N, Groot ED. Real-time ult rasound-guided catheterisation of the internal jugular vein: A prospective comparison with the landmark technique in critical care patients. Critical Care 10: 162-170, 2006
  8. Ganeshan A, Warakaulle DR, UberoiS R. Central venous access. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol 30: 26- 33, 2007
  9. Augoustides JG, Horak J, Ochroch AE, et al. A ran domized controlled clinical trial of real-time needle guided ultrasound for internal jugular venous can nulation in a large university anesthesia department. J Cardiothor Vasc Anesth 19: 310-15, 2005
  10. Troianos CA, Jobes DR, Ellison N. Ultrasound-guided cannulation of the internal jugular vein. Anesth Analg 72: 823-26, 1991
  11. Docktor BL, Sadler OJ, Gray RR, et al. Radiologic placement of tunneled central catheters: rates of suc cess and of immediate complications in a large series. AJR 173: 457-60, 1999
  12. Augoustides JG, Diaz D, Weiner J, et al. Current prac tice ofinternal jugular venous cannulation in a university anesthesia department: Influence of operator ex perience on success of cannulation and arterial injury. J Cardiothor Vasc Anesth 16: 567-571, 2002
  13. Denys BG, Uretsky BF, Reddy PS. Ultrasound-assis ted cannulationof the internal jugular vein. Circulation 87: 1557-1562, 1993
  14. Funaki B, Szymski GX, Hackworth CA, et al. Radiolog ic placement of subcutaneous infusion chest ports for long-term central venous access. Am J Roentgenol 169: 1431-34, 1997
  15. Lorch H, Zwaan M, Kagel C, Weiss HD. Central venous access ports placed by interventional radiolo gists: expe