Journals / Uluslararası Hematoloji-Onkoloji Dergisi / 2014 / Cilt: 24 - Sayı: 4

1988 FIGO Evrelemeseni Göre Evre II Endometrium Kanseri Olan Hastaların Analizi

Analysis of Patients with 1988 FIGO Stage-II Endometrial Cancer

Pages
239–246
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Systemic adjuvant therapy may be involved in the first-line treatment plan in order to prevent distant failures, since they continue to be responsible for the most of the recurrences and mortality despite radical surgeries and different protocols of adjuvant radiotherapy

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Management of stage II endometrial cancer still has many controversies.
📊
Key Findings & Data:We evaluated patients with stage II (FIGO 1988) endometrial cancer operated in our clinic in terms of treatment modalities, surgico-pathological factors, recurrence rates and patterns.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Systemic adjuvant therapy may be involved in the first-line treatment plan in order to prevent distant failures, since they continue to be responsible for the most of the recurrences and mortality despite radical surgeries and different protocols of adjuvant radiotherapy
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:2012 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Management of stage II endometrial cancer still has many controversies. We evaluated patients with stage II (FIGO 1988) endometrial cancer operated in our clinic in terms of treatment modalities, surgico-pathological factors, recurrence rates and patterns. Fifty-three patients with 1988 FIGO stage II endometrial cancer who underwent staging surgery between January 1993 and December 2012 were included in this study. The mean age of the patients was 57 years. Cervical invasion couldn’t be detected in the preoperative pelvic examination in 47 patients (88.7%). Thirty-eight patients received simple hysterectomy (SH) and 15 patients had radical hysterectomy (RH). All patients received pelvic and paraaortic lymphadenectomy. Forty-two patients took adjuvant radiotherapy. The median follow-up time of the patient population was 39 months (range 1-139 months). Recurrence was observed in four patients. There was no statistically significant difference between the RH and SH groups in terms of recurrence (p= 0.53). Advanced age, deep myometrial invasion and the lower number of harvested lymph nodes were associated with recurrence. Systemic adjuvant therapy may be involved in the first-line treatment plan in order to prevent distant failures, since they continue to be responsible for the most of the recurrences and mortality despite radical surgeries and different protocols of adjuvant radiotherapy

Özet

Evre II endometriyum kanserinin yönetimi hala tartışmalıdır. Kliniğimizde opere olan evre II endometriyum kanseri olan hastaları tedavi çeşitleri, cerrahi-patolojik faktörler, rekürrens şekli ve sıklığı açısından değerlendirdik. Çalışmaya Ocak 1993 ve Ekim 2012 tarihleri arasında evreleme cerrahisi geçiren evre II endometriyum kanseri olan 53 hasta dahil edildi. Hastaların ortalama yaşı 57 idi. Servikal invazyon 47 hastanın (%88.7) preoperatif incelemesinde saptanamadı. Otuz-sekiz hastaya basit histerektomi (BH) ve 15 hastaya radikal histerektomi (RH) yapıldı. Tüm hastalara pelvik ve paraaortik lenfadenektomi yapıldı. Kırk-iki hasta adjuvan radyoterapi aldı. Hastaların ortalama takip süresi 39 aydı (aralık, 1-139). Rekürrens 4 hastada gelişti. RH ve BH grupları arasında rekürrens açısından farklılık yoktu (p= 0.53). İleri yaş, derin myometrial invazyon ve az sayıda lenf nodu çıkartılması rekürrens ile ilişkiliydi. Evre II endometriyum kanserinde radikal cerrahilere ve farklı adjuvan radyoterapi protokollerine rağmen rekürrenslerin ve mortalitenin esas sorumlusu uzak metastazlardır. Bundan dolayı, uzak metastazları engelleyebilmek için sistemik adjuvan tedavi bu hastalığın birinci basamak tedavisinde düşünülebilir.

🔖

Cite This Article

ÜREYEN, I., TURAN, A. T., KİMYON, G., KARALÖK, M. A., TAŞÇI, T., BORAN, N., TULUNAY, G., KÖSE, M. F. (2014). 1988 FIGO Evrelemeseni Göre Evre II Endometrium Kanseri Olan Hastaların Analizi. Uluslararası Hematoloji-Onkoloji Dergisi, Cilt: 24 - Sayı: 4, 239–246. https://ajindex.com/articles/322917

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (13)

  1. Eser SY and Karakılınç H. Cancer Incidence in Turkey. Chapter 1.6 page: 35-51, In: Cancer Control in Turkey. Tuncer AM, Özgül N, Olcayto E and Gültekin M (eds). Ministry Publication Number: 776, Ankara, 2010.
  2. Creasman WT, Odicino F, Maisonneuve P, et al. Carcinoma of the corpus uteri. FIGO 26th Annual Report on the Results of Treatment in Gynecological Cancer. Int J Gynaecol Obstet 95 Suppl 1:S105-43, 2006.
  3. Benedet JL, Bender H, Jones 3rd H, et al. FIGO staging classifications and clinical practice guidelines in the management of gynecologic cancers. FIGO Committee on Gynecologic Oncology. Int J Gynaecol Obstet 70: 209-262, 2000. Creasman W. Revised FIGO staging for carcinoma of the endometrium. Int J Gynaecol Obstet 105: 109, 2009. Prat J. Prognostic parameters of endometrial carcinoma. Hum Pathol 35: 649-662, 2004.
  4. Heyman J, Reuterwall O, Benner S. The Radiumhemmet experience with radiotherapy in cancer of the corpus of the uterus. Acta Radiol 22: 13-98, 1941. Kottmeier HL. The classification and clinical staging of carcinoma of the uterus and vagina. J Int Fed Gynaecol 1: 83-93, 1963.
  5. Cornelison TL, Trimble EL, Kosary CL. SEER data, corpus uteri cancer: treatment trends versus survival for FIGO stage II, 1988-1994. Gynecol Oncol 74: 350-355, 1999.
  6. Mariani A, Webb MJ, Keeney GL, et al. Role of wide/radical hysterectomy and pelvic lymph node dissection in endometrial cancer with cervical involvement. Gynecol Oncol 83: 72- 80, 2001.
  7. Eltabbakh GH, Moore AD. Survival of women with surgical stage II endometrial cancer. Gynecol Oncol 74: 80-85, 1999.
  8. Ayhan A, Taskiran C, Celik C, Yuce K. The long-term survival of women with surgical stage II endometrioid type endometrial cancer. Gynecol Oncol 93: 9-13, 2004.
  9. Cohn DE, Woeste EM, Cacchio S, et al. Clinical and pathologic correlates in surgical stage II endometrial carcinoma. Obstet Gynecol 109: 1062-7, 2007.
  10. Boente MP, Edgardo LY, McIntosh DG, et al. Prognostic factors and long-term survival in endometrial adenocarcinoma with cervical involvement. Gynecol Oncol 51: 316-322, 1993.
  11. Leminen A, Forss M, Lehtovirta P. Endometrial adenocarcinoma with clinical evidence of cervical involvement: accuracy of diagnostic procedures, clinical course, and prognostic factors. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 74: 61-66, 1995.
  12. Tamura H, Nakai Y, Nagano T, et al. Treatment and prognosis of pT2 endometrial carcinoma. Nihon Sanka Fujinka Gakkai Zasshi 43: 315-320, 1991.
  13. Orezzoli JP, Sioletic S, Olawaiye A, et al. Stage II endometrioid ade