Journals / Uluslararası Hematoloji-Onkoloji Dergisi / 2018 / Cilt: 28 - Sayı: 1

Malign Peritoneal Mezotelyoma Hastalarında Sitoredüktif Cerrahi ve Hipertermik İntraperitoneal Kemoterapi (HIPEC) Etkinliği: Tersiyer Bir Merkez Deneyimi

The Effectiveness of Cytoreductive Surgery and Hyperthermic Intraperitoneal Chemotherapy (HIPEC) in Patients with Malignant Peritoneal Mesothelioma: A Tertiary Center Experience

Pages
11–18
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

In this study, we aimed to investigate the effect of cytoreductive surgery (CRS) and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) procedures on overall survival (OS), morbidity, and mortality rates in patients with malignant peritoneal mesothelioma (MPM), an extremely rare tumor.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:In this study, we aimed to investigate the effect of cytoreductive surgery (CRS) and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) procedures on overall survival (OS), morbidity, and mortality rates in patients with malignant peritoneal mesothelioma (MPM), an extremely rare tumor.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Between January 2012 and March 2017, 21 patients who were diagnosed with a MPM and underwent CRS plus HIPEC were retrospectively analyzed.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:In addition, our morbidity and mortality rates are consistent with the current literature
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:2012 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

In this study, we aimed to investigate the effect of cytoreductive surgery (CRS) and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) procedures on overall survival (OS), morbidity, and mortality rates in patients with malignant peritoneal mesothelioma (MPM), an extremely rare tumor. Between January 2012 and March 2017, 21 patients who were diagnosed with a MPM and underwent CRS plus HIPEC were retrospectively analyzed. The median age was 60 (range, 18 to 80) years. Eighteen patients (76.2%) had a history of exposure to asbestos. The median follow-up was 17 months (range, 1 to 36 months). The median OS was 26 months. The rates of OS at 12, 24, and 36 months were 80%, 80%, and 40.5%, respectively. The perioperative mortality and morbidity rates were 4.8% and 33.3%, respectively. The 3-year survival rate was 93.8 % for patients treated with a CC 0 or 1 resection, whereas the median OS was 6 months for those treated with a CC 2 or 3 resection (p= 0.007). Age, gender, smoking status, asbestos exposure, pathological type, peritoneal cancer index (PCI), lymph node involvement, ascites, and cancer antigen (CA)-125 were not found to significantly influence the OS in univariate analysis (p> 0.05). A successful CRS plus HIPEC in selected patients with MPM seems to have beneficial effects on OS. In addition, our morbidity and mortality rates are consistent with the current literature

Özet

Malign Peritoneal Mezotelyoma Hastalarında Sitoredüktif Cerrahi ve Hipertermik İntraperitoneal Kemoterapi (HIPEC) Etkinliği: Tersiyer Bir Merkez DeneyimiBu çalışmada oldukça nadir görülen bir tümör olan malign peritoneal mezotelyoma olgularında sitoredüksiyon cerrahisi ve hipertermik intraperitoneal kemoterapinin (HIPEC) genel sağkalım (OS), morbidite ve mortalite oranları üzerindeki etkisi araştırıldı. Bu çalışmada Ocak 2012 - Mart 2017 tarihleri arasında malign mezotelyoma tanısı konulan ve akabinde sitoredüksiyon cerrahisi ve HIPEC tedavisi uygulanan 21 olgu retrospektif olarak incelendi. Hastaların ortanca yaşı 60 yıl idi. On sekiz hastada (%76.2) asbeste maruz kalma öyküsü vardı. Ortanca takip süresi 17 ay olarak bulundu. Ortanca OS süresi 26 aydı. 12, 24 ve 36. aylardaki OS oranları sırasıyla %80, %80 ve %40.5 olarak saptandı. Perioperatif mortalite ve morbidite oranları sırasıyla %4.8 ve %33,3 idi. Sitoredüksiyon skoru (CC) 0 veya 1 olan hastalarda 3 yıllık OS oranı %93.8 iken, CC 2 veya 3 olanlarda ortanca OS 6 ay olarak tespit edildi (p= 0.007). Tek değişkenli analizde yaş, cinsiyet, sigara içme durumu, asbeste maruz kalma, patolojik tip, Peritoneal Kanser İndeksi (PCI) skoru, lenf nodu tutulumu, asit ve kanser antijen (CA)-125'in OS'yi anlamlı derecede etkilemediği bulundu (p> 0.05). Malign peritoneal mezotelyoma olgularında başarılı bir sitoredüksiyon cerrahisi ve HIPEC tedavisi, sağkalım üzerinde olumlu bir etkiye sahiptir. Morbidite ve mortalite oranlarımız literatür ile uyumludur

🔖

Cite This Article

AKSEL, B., ŞAHİN, H., SARI, M. E. (2018). Malign Peritoneal Mezotelyoma Hastalarında Sitoredüktif Cerrahi ve Hipertermik İntraperitoneal Kemoterapi (HIPEC) Etkinliği: Tersiyer Bir Merkez Deneyimi. Uluslararası Hematoloji-Onkoloji Dergisi, Cilt: 28 - Sayı: 1, 11–18. https://ajindex.com/articles/322800

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (14)

  1. Bridda A, Padoan I, Mencarelli R, et al. Peritoneal mesothelioma: a review. Med Gen Med 9: 32, 2007
  2. Peto J, Decarli A, La Vecchia C, et al. The European mesothelioma epidemic. BJC 79: 666-672, 1999
  3. Antman K, Hassan R, Eisner M, et al. Update on malignant mesothelioma. Oncology (Williston Park) 19: 1301-1309, 2005
  4. Price B, Ware A. Time trend of mesothelioma incidence in the United States and projection of future cases: an update based on SEER data for 1973 through 2005. Crit Rev Toxicol 39: 576-588, 2009
  5. Larson T, Melnikova N, Davis SI, et al. Incidence and descriptive epidemiology of mesothelioma in the United States, 1999-2002. Int J Occup Environ Med 13: 398-403, 2007
  6. Spirtas R, Heineman EF, Bernstein L, et al. Malignant mesothelioma: attributable risk of asbestos exposure. J Occup Environ Med 51: 804-811, 1994
  7. Boffetta P. Epidemiology of peritoneal mesothelioma: a review. Ann Oncol 18: 985-990, 2007
  8. Kraynie A, de Ridder GG, Sporn TA, et al. Malignant mesothelioma not related to asbestos exposure: Analytical scanning electron microscopic analysis of 83 cases and comparison with 442 asbestos-related cases. Ultrastruct Pathol 40: 142-146, 2016
  9. Dragon J, Thompson J, MacPherson M, et al. Differential Susceptibility of Human Pleural and Peritoneal Mesothelial Cells to Asbestos Exposure. J Cell Biochem 116: 1540-1552, 2015
  10. Acherman YI, Welch LS, Bromley CM, et al. Clinical presentation of peritoneal mesothelioma. Tumori 89: 269-273, 2003
  11. Patel NP, Taylor CA, Levine EA, et al. Cytomorphologic features of primary peritoneal mesothelioma in effusion, washing, and fine-needle aspiration biopsy specimens: examination of 49 cases at one institution, including post-intraperitoneal hyperthermic chemotherapy findings. Am J Clin Pathol 128: 414-422, 2007
  12. Husain AN, Colby TV, Ordonez NG, et al. Guidelines for pathologic diagnosis of malignant mesothelioma: a consensus statement from the International Mesothelioma Interest Group. Arch Pathol Lab Med 133: 1317-1331, 2009
  13. Cerruto CA, Brun EA, Chang D, et al. Prognostic significance of histomorphologic parameters in diffuse malignant peritoneal mesothelioma. Arch Pathol Lab Med 130: 1654-1661, 2006
  14. Liu S, Staats P, Lee M, et al. Diffuse mesothelioma of the peritoneum: correlation between histological and clinical parameters and survival in 73 patients. Pathology 46: 604-609, 2014 15. Tudor EC, Chua TC, Liauw W, et al. Risk factors and clinicopathological study of pr