SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Ulusal Cerrahi Dergisi / 2011 / Cilt: 27 - Sayı: 2

Comparison of fast-track and conventional methods in gastric cancer surgery

Mide kanseri cerrahisinde fast-track ve geleneksel yöntemlerin karşılaştırılması

Bahri ÇAKABAY
Salim DEMİRCİ
Bülent AKSEL
Ekrem ÜNAL
Sancar BAYAR
Hilmi KOCAOĞLU
Hikmet AKGÜL
Pages
74–77
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Conclusion: Fast-track surgery accelerates rehabilitation and leads to a shorter hospital stay for patients with gastric cancer.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Objective: To compare outcome of gastric cancer surgery with a fast-track rehabilitation program and conventional care.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Patient and Method: Seventy-seven patients operated on for gastric cancer were divided into a fast-track surgery group (n=43) and conventional surgery group (n=34).
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Conclusion: Fast-track surgery accelerates rehabilitation and leads to a shorter hospital stay for patients with gastric cancer.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Objective: To compare outcome of gastric cancer surgery with a fast-track rehabilitation program and conventional care. Background: Fast-track surgery is a promising comprehensive perioperative care program for surgical patients and is beneficial to recovery. There is not much data on fast-track surgery for gastric cancer. Patient and Method: Seventy-seven patients operated on for gastric cancer were divided into a fast-track surgery group (n=43) and conventional surgery group (n=34). We compared the outcomes of postoperative complications, duration of postoperative stay in hospital, and re-admission between the two groups. Results: Compared with the conventional surgery group, the fasttrack surgery group had no more complications, the re-admission rate was lower and the duration of the hospital stay was signifıcantly shorter. Conclusion: Fast-track surgery accelerates rehabilitation and leads to a shorter hospital stay for patients with gastric cancer.

Özet

Amaç: Mide kanseri cerrahisinde fast-track rehabilitasyon programı ile geleneksel cerrahi bakımı karşılaştırmak. Arkaplan: Fast-track cerrahisi, iyileşmeyi hızlandıran, cerrahi hastalar için umut vadeden yoğunlaştırılmış bir perioperatif bakım programdır. Mide kanserinde fast-track cerrahi ile ilgili çok az bilgi bulunmaktadır. Hastalar ve Yöntem: Mide kanseri nedeniyle ameliyat edilmiş 77 hasta; fast-track cerrahi gurubu (n=43) ve geleneksel cerrahi grup (n=34) olarak ikiye ayrıldı. İki grup postoperatf komplikasyonlar, postoperatif hastanede yatış süresi ve tekrar hastaneye yatış yönünden karşılaştırıldı. Bulgular: Geleneksel cerrahiyle karşılaştırıldığında fast-track cerrahisi, komplikasyonları artırmadan ve yeniden hastaneye yatmaya yol açmadan hastanede yatış süresini kısaltmaktadır. Sonuç; Fast-track cerrahisi mide kanserli hastalarda rehabilitasyonu hızlandırmakta ve hastanede yatış süresini kısaltmaktadır.

🔖

Cite This Article

ÇAKABAY, B., DEMİRCİ, S., AKSEL, B., ÜNAL, E., BAYAR, S., KOCAOĞLU, H., AKGÜL, H. (2011). Comparison of fast-track and conventional methods in gastric cancer surgery. Ulusal Cerrahi Dergisi, Cilt: 27 - Sayı: 2, 74–77. https://ajindex.com/articles/325471

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (5)

  1. Ferlay J, Bray F, Pisani P, Parkin DM: GLOBOCAN 2002: Cancer Incidence, Mortality and Prevalence Worldwide. In IARC CancerBase No.5. version 2.0 Lyon, IARC Press; 2004
  2. Lee SI, Choi YS, Park DJ, Kim HH, Yang HK, Kim MC. Comparative study of laparoscopy-assisted distal gastrectomy and open distal gastrectomy. J Am Coll Surg 2006;202:874-880. DOI:10.1016/j. jamcollsurg.2006.02.028 3. Rohde H, Bauer P, Stützer H, Heitmann K, Gebbensleben B. Proximal compared with distal adenocarcinoma of the stomach: differences and consequences. German Gastric Cancer TNM Study Group.Br J Surg 1991;78: 1242-1248. DOI:10.1002/bjs.1800781031 4. Carrère N, Seulin P, Julio CH, Bloom E, Gouzi JL, Pradère B. Is nasogastric or nasojejunal decompression necessary after gastrectomy? A prospective randomized trial. World J Surg 2007;31: 122-127. DOI:10.1007/s00268-006-0430-9 5. Yoo CH, Son BH, Han WK, Pae WK. Nasogastric decompression is not necessary in operations for gastric cancer: prospective randomised trial. Eur J Surg 2002;168:379-383
  3. Wang D, Kong Y, Zhong B, Zhou X, Zhou Y. Fast-track surgery improves postoperative recovery in patients with gastric cancer: a randomized comparison with conventional postoperative care. J Gastrointest Surg 2010;14: 620-627
  4. Sipos P, Ondrejka P. “Fast track” colorectal surgery. Orv Hetil 2007;148:963-969. DOI:10.1556/OH.2007.27996 8. Kehlet H. Surgical stress: the role of pain and analgesia. Br J Anaesth 1989; 63: 189- 195. DOI:10.1093/bja/63.2.189 9. Kehlet H, Dahl JB. Anaesthesia, surgery, and challenges in postoperative recovery. Lancet 2003;362:1921-1928. DOI:10.1016/ S0140-6736(03)14966-5 10. Kehlet H, Wilmore DW. Evidence-based surgical care and the evolution of fasttrack surgery. Ann Surg 2008;248:189- 198. DOI:10.1097/SLA.0b013e31817f2c1a 11. Guenaga KK, Matos D, Wille-Jørgensen P. Mechanical bowel preparation for elective colorectal surgery. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2009;1:CD001544
  5. Kehlet H, Werner M, Perkins F. Balanced analgesia: what is it and what are its advantages in postoperative pain? Drugs 1999;58:793-797. DOI:10.2165/00003495- 199958050-00002 13. Sessler DI. Temperature monitoring and perioperative thermoregulation. Anesthesiology 2008; 109: 318-338. DOI:10.1097/ALN.0b013e31817f6d76 14. Kehlet H, Bundgaard-Nielsen M. Goaldirected perioperative fluid management: why, when, and how? Anesthesiology 2009;110:453-455. DOI:10.1097/ ALN.0b013e3181984217 15. Bundgaard-Nielsen M, Secher NH, Kehlet H. ’Liberal’ vs. ‘res