SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Uluslararası İktisadi ve İdari İncelemeler Dergisi / 2015 / Sayı: 15

FINANCIAL EFFICIENCY ANALYSIS OF METROPOLITAN MUNICIPALITIES WITH INTEGRATED DEA AND GRA: THE CASE OF TURKEY

BÜTÜNLEŞİK VZA ve GİA YÖNTEMLERİYLE BÜYÜKŞEHİR BELEDİYELERİNİN MALİ ETKİNLİK ANALİZİ: TÜRKİYE ÖRNEĞİ

ZELİHA KAYGISIZ ERTUĞ
NURAY GİRGİNER
Pages
411–428
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

The results of applying DEA and GRA to the efficient municipalities (Gaziantep, Erzurum, Eskisehir, Antalya, Samsun, Adana, Ankara and Istanbul Metropolitan Municipalities) in terms of monetary services indicate that Istanbul Metropolitan Municipality has the highest performance and Ankara Metropolitan Municipality has the lowest performance

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:The aim of this study is to identify the activities of metropolitan municipalities in Turkey in terms of monetary services and sequence them according to their performances.
📊
Key Findings & Data:First, the monetary services activities of 14 metropolitan municipalities have been identified by a DEA (Data Envelopment Analysis) model that is related to three inputs and three outputs.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:The results of applying DEA and GRA to the efficient municipalities (Gaziantep, Erzurum, Eskisehir, Antalya, Samsun, Adana, Ankara and Istanbul Metropolitan Municipalities) in terms of monetary services indicate that Istanbul Metropolitan Municipality has the highest performance and Ankara Metropolitan Municipality has the lowest performance
🔬Design:Modeling & Simulation
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Belediye · Etkinlik · Veri Zarflama Analizi

Abstract

The aim of this study is to identify the activities of metropolitan municipalities in Turkey in terms of monetary services and sequence them according to their performances. First, the monetary services activities of 14 metropolitan municipalities have been identified by a DEA (Data Envelopment Analysis) model that is related to three inputs and three outputs. DEA provides the performance improvement findings of decision-making units which are not efficient; however, any sequence for efficient decision making units cannot be attained via DEA. Therefore, the municipalities identified as efficient in terms of monetary services with DEA are sequenced with GRA (Grey Relation Analysis). In this way, the municipalities carrying out their monetary services efficiently could be sequenced among themselves. In addition, the efficient factors in the performances of the efficient municipalities could be identified with GRA. The results of applying DEA and GRA to the efficient municipalities (Gaziantep, Erzurum, Eskisehir, Antalya, Samsun, Adana, Ankara and Istanbul Metropolitan Municipalities) in terms of monetary services indicate that Istanbul Metropolitan Municipality has the highest performance and Ankara Metropolitan Municipality has the lowest performance

Özet

Bu çalışmanın amacı Türkiye’deki büyükşehir belediyelerinin mali hizmetlerdeki etkinliklerini belirleyerek performanslarına göre sıralamaktır. Öncelikle 14 büyükşehir belediyesinin mali hizmetlerindeki etkinlikleri üç girdi ve üç çıktı içeren bir VZA (Veri Zarflama Analizi) modeli ile belirlenmiştir. VZA, etkin olmayan karar verme birimlerine ilişkin performans iyileştirme bulguları ortaya koysa da, etkin karar verme birimleri için herhangi bir sıralama sağlayamamaktadır. Bu nedenle, VZA ile mali hizmetlerde etkin olarak belirlenen büyükşehir belediyeleri GĠA (Gri Ġlişkisel Analiz) ile sıralanmışlardır. Böylelikle mali hizmetlerini başarılı bir şekilde yürüten belediyelerin kendi aralarında sıralanması sağlanmıştır. Bunun yanı sıra etkin belediyelerin performanslarına etki eden faktörler de GĠA ile belirlenebilmiştir. VZA ve mali hizmetlerinde etkin olan belediyelere (Gaziantep, Erzurum, Eskişehir, Antalya, Samsun, Adana, Ankara veĠstanbul BüyükşehirBelediyeleri) uygulanan GĠA sonuçlarına göre, Ġstanbul Büyükşehir Belediyesi en yüksek performansa, Anakara Büyükşehir Belediyesi ise en düşük performansa sahip belediyedir

🔖

Cite This Article

ERTUĞ, Z. K., GİRGİNER, N. (2015). FINANCIAL EFFICIENCY ANALYSIS OF METROPOLITAN MUNICIPALITIES WITH INTEGRATED DEA AND GRA: THE CASE OF TURKEY. Uluslararası İktisadi ve İdari İncelemeler Dergisi, Sayı: 15, 411–428. https://ajindex.com/articles/322664

References (9)

  1. AFONSO, A. and FERNANDES, S. (2008),“Assessing and Explaining the Relative Efficiency of Local Government”,The Journal of Socio-Economics,37(5), 1946–1979.
  2. BALAGUER-COLL T.M., PRIOR, D. and TORTOSA-AUSINA, E. (2007),“On the Determinants of Local Government Performance: ATwo-stage Nonparametric Approach”, European Economic Review, 51(2), 425-451.
  3. BEHDİOĞLU, S. and ÖZCAN, G. (2009),“Veri Zarflama Analizi ile Banka-cılık Sektöründe Bir Uygulama”, Süleyman Demirel Üniversitesi İİBF Dergisi, 14(3), 301-326.
  4. BOETTI, L., PIACENZA, M. and TURATI, G. (2009),“Fiscal Decentraliza-tion and Spending Efficiency of Local Governments, An empirical Investigation on a Sample of Italian Municipalities”, Working paper SIEP, UniversitadegliStudi di Pavia. BOUSSOFIANE, A., DYSON, R.G. and THANASSOULIS, E. (1991),“Applied Data Envelopment Analysis”, European Journal of Operational Research, 52(1), 1-15.
  5. CHARNES, A., COOPER, W. and RHODES, E. (1978),“Measuring the Ef-ficiency of Decision Making Units”, European Journal of Operational Research, 2, 429-444.
  6. ÇAĞLAR, A. (2003),“Veri Zarflama Analizi ile Belediyelerin Etkinlik Öl-çümü”,Unpublished PhD Thesis, Hacettepe University, Institute of Sciences, Anka-ra. DENG, J. L. (1988), Properties of Relational Space for Grey System, In J. L. Deng (Ed.), Essential topics on grey system theory and applications (pp. 1–13). Bei-jing: China Ocean. DOĞAN, Ö.N. (2006),“Veri Zarflama Analizi ile Belediyelerde Performans Ölçümü: Kapadokya Bölgesi Örneği”, Unpublished Master’s Thesis, Erciyes Uni-versity, Institute of Social Sciences, Kayseri. GIORDANO, R. and TOMMASINO, P. (2011),“Public Sector Efficiency and Political Cultur”, Temi di discussion, Working Papers, No. 786. HSIA, K. H. and WU, J.H. (1997),“A study on the data preprocessing in grey relational analysis”, Journal of Chinese Grey System 1, 47–53.
  7. KALB, A. (2010a),“Public Sector Efficiency: An Application to Local Gov-ernments in Germany”, Wiesbaden: GablerVerlag. KALB, A., GEYS, B. and HEINEMANN, F. (2012),“Value for Money? German Local Government Efficiency in a Comparative Perspective”, Applied Eco-nomics, 44(2), 201-218.
  8. KARACAER, S. (1998),“Antalya Yöresindeki 4 ve 5 Yıldızlı Otellerde Top-lam Etkinlik Ölçümü: Bir Veri Zarflama Analizi Uygulaması”, Unpublished Mas-ter’s Thesis, Hacettepe University, Institute of Social Sciences, Ankara.
  9. KLOOT, L. (1999),“Performance Measurement and Accountability in Victo-rian Local Government”, The International Journal of Public Sector Management,