SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Uluslararası Tarım ve Yaban Hayatı Bilimleri Dergisi / 2019 / Cilt: 5 - Sayı: 2

Reactions of Some Common Bean Cultivars to Rhizoctonia Web Blight

Rhizoctonia Ağ Yanıklığı Hastalığına Karşı Bazı Fasulye Çeşitlerinin Reaksiyonları

Gülsüm PALACIOĞLU
HARUN BAYRAKTAR
Göksel ÖZER
Pages
273–279
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Among the tested cultivars, the most resistant cultivar was the bean cultivar 40 günlük, followed by the common bean cultivars Java and Klas.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Rhizoctonia solani causing web blight, root and hypocotyl rot of bean is a prevalent and economically important pathogen in bean production areas.
📊
Key Findings & Data:The aim of study was to evaluate the disease reactions of 30 common bean cultivars that commonly grown in Turkey against Rhizoctonia web blight using leaf inoculation method.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Among the tested cultivars, the most resistant cultivar was the bean cultivar 40 günlük, followed by the common bean cultivars Java and Klas.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Ağ yanıklığı · fasulye · hastalık reaksiyonu

Abstract

Rhizoctonia solani causing web blight, root and hypocotyl rot of bean is a prevalent and economically important pathogen in bean production areas. The aim of study was to evaluate the disease reactions of 30 common bean cultivars that commonly grown in Turkey against Rhizoctonia web blight using leaf inoculation method. Pathogen isolate was classified as R. solani AG-4 HG II by PCR-RFLP method. None of the common bean cultivars evaluated in this study was completely resistant to the disease, while 13 cultivars were considered as moderately resistant and 17 cultivars as susceptible. Among the tested cultivars, the most resistant cultivar was the bean cultivar 40 günlük, followed by the common bean cultivars Java and Klas.

Özet

Rhizoctonia solani fasulye üretim alanlarında yaygın olarak görülen ve ağ yanıklığı, kök ve hipokotil çürüklüğüne sebep olarak önemli ekonomik kayıplar oluşturan bir hastalık etmenidir. Bu çalışma kapsamında Rhizoctonia ağ yanıklığı hastalığına karşı ülkemizde yaygın olarak yetiştirilen 30 fasulye çeşidinin hastalık reaksiyonları yaprak inokulasyon yöntemi ile değerlendirilmiştir. Patojen izolatı PCR-RFLP yöntemi ile R. solani AG-4 HG II olarak sınıflandırılmıştır. Çalışma kapsamında değerlendirilen fasulye çeşitlerinin hiçbiri hastalığa tam dayanıklı değil iken 13 çeşit orta dayanıklı, 17 çeşit ise hassas olarak değerlendirilmiştir. Test edilen çeşitler arasında en dayanıklı çeşit 40 günlük fasulye çeşidi olup bunu Java ve Klas fasulye çeşitleri takip etmiştir.

🔖

Cite This Article

PALACIOĞLU, G., BAYRAKTAR, H., ÖZER, G. (2019). Reactions of Some Common Bean Cultivars to Rhizoctonia Web Blight. Uluslararası Tarım ve Yaban Hayatı Bilimleri Dergisi, Cilt: 5 - Sayı: 2, 273–279. https://ajindex.com/articles/321781

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (11)

  1. Akarca, Z. (2013). Erzincan ilinde fasulye bitkilerinin toprak üstü aksamlarından izole edilen Rhizoctonia türlerinin anastomosis grupları ve patojenitesi. Yüksek Lisans Tezi, Atatürk Üniversitesi,
  2. Fen Bilimleri Enstitüsü, Erzurum. Bautista-Pérez, M. D. J., & Echávez-Badel, R. (2000). Methodology for screening common bean resistance to web blight. The Journal of Agriculture of the University of Puerto Rico, 84(1-2), 91-94.
  3. Beaver, J. S., Zapata, M., Alameda, M., Porch, T. G., & Rosas, J. C. (2012). Registration of PR0401-259 and PR0650-31 dry bean germplasm lines. Journal of Plant Registrations, 6(1), 81-84.
  4. Demirci, E., & Doken, M. T. (1995). Anastomosis groups of Rhizoctonia solani Kuhn and binucleate Rhizoctonia isolates from various crops in Turkiye. Journal of Turkish Phytopathology, 24(2), 57-62.
  5. Eken, C., & Demirci, E. (2004). Anastomosis groups and pathogenicity of Rhizoctonia solani and binucleate Rhizoctonia isolates from bean in Erzurum, Turkey. Journal of Plant Pathology, 49-52.
  6. Erper, I., Ozkoc, I., & Karaca, G. H. (2011). Identification and pathogenicity of Rhizoctonia species isolated from bean and soybean plants in Samsun, Turkey. Archives of Phytopathology and Plant Protection, 44(1), 78-84.
  7. Erper, İ., Karaca, G. H., & Balkaya, A. (2003). Samsun ilinde üretimi yapılan bazı taze fasulye çeşitlerinin Rhizoctonia solani'ye duyarlılıklarının belirlenmesi. OMÜ Ziraat Fakültesi Dergisi, 18, 3-6.
  8. FAOSTAT. (2018). Gıda ve tarım örgütü. http://www.fao.org/faostat/en/#data/QC. Erişim tarihi: 15 Mayıs 2019.
  9. Galindo, J. J., Abawi, G. S., & Thurston, H. D. (1982). Variability among isolates of Rhizoctonia solani associated with snap bean hypocotyls and soils in New York. Plant Disease, 66(5), 390-394.
  10. Godoy-Lutz, G., Kuninaga, S., Steadman, J. R., & Powers, K. (2008). Phylogenetic analysis of Rhizoctonia solani subgroups associated with web blight symptoms on common bean based on ITS-5.8 S rDNA. Journal of General Plant Pathology, 74(1), 32-40.
  11. Godoy-Lutz, G., Steadman, J. R., Higgins, B., & Powers, K. (2003). Genetic variation among isolates of the web blight pathogen of common bean based on PCR-RFLP of the ITS-rDNA region. Plant Disease, 87(7), 766-771. González, N., Godoy-Lutz, G., Steadman, J. R., Higgins, R., & Eskridge, K. M. (2012). Assessing genetic diversity in the web blight pathogen Thanatephorus cucumeris (anamorph= Rhizoctonia solani) subgroups AG-1-IE and AG-1-IF with molecular markers. Journal of General Plant Pathology, 78(2), 85-98. Go