SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Uluslararası Ticaret ve Tahkim Hukuku Dergisi / 2015 / Cilt: 4 - Sayı: 2

CONFIDENTIALITY IN INTERNATIONAL ARBITRATION

MİLLETLERARASI TAHKİMDE GİZLİLİK

FARUK KEREM GİRAY
Pages
65–121
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

The study also examines the entities with respect to which conf identiality has to be ensured, the legal sources of it, the exceptional situations that require the lif ting of the conf identiality veil, the temporal aspects of conf identiality and the consequences of violating the principle of conf identiality.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:In this study, the notion of conf identiality in international arbitration is examined f rom various perspectives.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Issues addressed in the study include the question of whether or not conf identiality is a procedural or substantive concept, and whether or not conf identiality is in the nature of arbitration.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:The study also examines the entities with respect to which conf identiality has to be ensured, the legal sources of it, the exceptional situations that require the lif ting of the conf identiality veil, the temporal aspects of conf identiality and the consequences of violating the principle of conf identiality.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

In this study, the notion of conf identiality in international arbitration is examined f rom various perspectives. Issues addressed in the study include the question of whether or not conf identiality is a procedural or substantive concept, and whether or not conf identiality is in the nature of arbitration. The subj ect matter is explored f rom a comparative law point of view, by analyzing the laws of various countries in the Common law and Continental European j udicial systems as well as the rules of certain arbitral institutions. The study also examines the entities with respect to which conf identiality has to be ensured, the legal sources of it, the exceptional situations that require the lif ting of the conf identiality veil, the temporal aspects of conf identiality and the consequences of violating the principle of conf identiality.

Özet

Bu çalışmada, milletlerarası tahkimde gizlilik kavramı çeşitli yönleriyle incelenmiştir. Tahkimin gizliliğinin usulü mü yoksa maddi hukuka mı ilişkin olduğu keza tahkim yargılamasının özünde gizliliğin var olup olmadığı inceleme konusu yapılmıştır. Mukayeseli hukuk açısından Common Law ve Kıta Avrupası hukuk sisteminin hakim olduğu çeşitli ülkelerin milletlerarası tahkim kanunları ile kurumsal tahkim merkezlerinin tahkim kurallarında gizliliğin ne şekilde düzenlendiği de irdelenmiştir. Bunun dışında tahkimin gizliliğinin muhafazasının kimler için söz konusu olacağı, hukuki kaynakları, gizlilik perdesinin kaldırılmasını gerektiren istisnai haller ile gizliliğin zaman boyutu ve gizliliğin ihlalinin hukuki sonuçları çalışmanın kapsamı içindedir.

🔖

Cite This Article

GİRAY, F. K. (2015). CONFIDENTIALITY IN INTERNATIONAL ARBITRATION. Uluslararası Ticaret ve Tahkim Hukuku Dergisi, Cilt: 4 - Sayı: 2, 65–121. https://ajindex.com/articles/321559

References (17)

  1. Akıncı Ziya, Milletlerarası Tahkim, 3.Bası, İstanbul, 2013.
  2. Aygül Musa, Milletlerarası Ticari Tahkimde Tahkim Usulüne Uygulanacak Hukuk ve Deliller, İstanbul, 2. Bası, 2014. Berger Bernhard/Kellerhals Franz, International and Domestic Arbitration in Switzerland, 2. Bası, Bern, 2010.
  3. Bagner Hans, Confidentiality A Fundamental Principle in International Commercial Arbitration, Journal of International Arbitration, Kluwer, 18 (2), 2001.
  4. Born Gary, International Commercial Arbitration, Vol. II, Wolters Kluwer, Hollanda, 2014.
  5. Carlevaris Andrea, Confidentiality in ICC Arbitration, (Editors: Malatesta Alberto/Sali Rinaldo, The Rise of Transparency in International Arbitration, New York, 2013.
  6. Dayınlarlı Kemal, İç Tahkim, Ankara, 1997.
  7. Dessemontet François, Arbitration and Confidentiality, Arbitration and Confidentiality, American Review of International Arbitration, Vol 7, No: 3-4, 1996.
  8. Dolzer Rudolf, Schreuer Christoph, Principles of International Investment Law, Oxford, 2008.
  9. Dugan Christopher, Wallace Don, Rubins Noah, Sabahi Borzu, Investor-State Arbitration, Oxford, 2011.
  10. Ekşi Nuray, Hukuk Muhakemeleri Kanunu’nda Tahkim, İstanbul, 2013.
  11. Ekşi Nuray, Milletlerarası Deniz Ticareti Alanında “Incorporation” Yoluyla Yapılan Tahkim Anlaşmaları, İstanbul, 2004.
  12. Ekşi Nuray, ICSID Hakem Heyetinin Geçici ve koruyucu Tedbir Kararı Verme Yetkisi, Uluslararası Ticaret ve Tahkim Hukuku Dergisi, S.2, 2012.
  13. Erdem Bahadır, Patent Hakkının Korunmasına ve Patent Hakkına İlişkin Sözleşmelere Uygulanacak Hukuk, İstanbul, 2002.
  14. Giray Faruk Kerem, Milletlerarası Yatırım Tahkiminde Kamulaştırmadan Doğan Tazminat ve Tazminatın Hesaplanmasında Kullanılan Yöntemler, 2. Bası, 2013. Hwang Michael/Chung Katie, Defining the Indefinable: Practical Problems of Confidentiality in Arbitration, Journal of International Arbitration, Wolters Kluwer, Vol: 26, 2009. ICCA’S Guide To The Interpretation of The 1958 New York Convention: A Handbook For Judges, La Hague, 2011. Jolles Alexander/Traber Stark Sonja/Cediel de Canals Maria, International Arbitration in Switzerland, A Handbook for Practitioners,, Edited by Geisinger Elliott/Voser Nathalie/Petti M. Angelina, Kluwer Law International, 2.Edition, 2013.
  15. Kaplan Yavuz, Milletlerarası Tahkimde Usule Aykırılık, Ankara, 2002.
  16. Kocasakal Özdemir Hatice, Spor Tahkim Mahkemesi (CAS), İs- tanbul, 2013. Lew Julian/Mistellis Loukas/Kröll Stefan, Comparative International Commercial Arbitration, 2003,
  17. Hollanda, Wolters Kluwer, Hollanda. Pryles Michael, Conf