In this study, answers are sought to the questions of whether coast state intervention is possible in a ship navigating in international waters; under which circumstances can a coast state intervene in a ship navigating in international waters; whether a coast states notice is valid or not in international waters; in the affirmative case, what could be the sanction for the violation thereof; whether such notice grants the relevant state the right to seizure.
📌 3 Key Takeaways
🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:In this study, answers are sought to the questions of whether coast state intervention is possible in a ship navigating in international waters; under which circumstances can a coast state intervene in a ship navigating in international waters; whether a coast states notice is valid or not in international waters; in the affirmative case, what could be the sanction for the violation thereof; whether such notice grants the relevant state the right to seizure.
📊
Key Findings & Data:In this study, answers are sought to the questions of whether coast state intervention is possible in a ship navigating in international waters; under which circumstances can a coast state intervene in a ship navigating in international waters; whether a coast states notice is valid or not in international waters; in the affirmative case, what could be the sanction for the violation thereof; whether such notice grants the relevant state the right to seizure.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:In this study, answers are sought to the questions of whether coast state intervention is possible in a ship navigating in international waters; under which circumstances can a coast state intervene in a ship navigating in international waters; whether a coast states notice is valid or not in international waters; in the affirmative case, what could be the sanction for the violation thereof; whether such notice grants the relevant state the right to seizure.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters
Abstract
In this study, answers are sought to the questions of whether coast state intervention is possible in a ship navigating in international waters; under which circumstances can a coast state intervene in a ship navigating in international waters; whether a coast states notice is valid or not in international waters; in the affirmative case, what could be the sanction for the violation thereof; whether such notice grants the relevant state the right to seizure.
Özet
Çalışmamızda, milletlerarası sularda seyreden bir gemiye kıyı devletince müdahale edilip edilmeyeceği; müdahale edilebilecekse, mü- dahalenin hangi durumlarda söz konusu olabileceği; kıyı devleti tarafından yayınlanan bildirinin milletlerarası sularda geçerli olup olmadığı; bildiri geçerli ise buna aykırı davranışın müeyyidelerinin neler olabileceği, ilgili devlete el koyma ve müsadere hakkı verip vermediği sorularına cevap aranmaktadır.
🔖
Cite This Article
TÜTÜNCÜ, A. N. (2016). EVALUATION OF A COASTAL STATES INTERFERENCE IN THE LIGHT OF ARREST AND SEIZURE OF THE SHIP NAVIGATING IN INTERNATIONAL WATERS BY GEORGIA. Uluslararası Ticaret ve Tahkim Hukuku Dergisi, Cilt: 5 - Sayı: 1, 29–45. https://ajindex.com/articles/321534
References (4)
A.E. AÇIKEL, Uluslararası Deniz Hukukunda Gemilere El Konulması Halinde Bayrak Devletinin Yetkileri, Uluslararası Deniz Hukukunda Kıyı Devletinin Gemilere El Koyma Yetkisinin Sınırları Sempozyumu, Karadeniz Teknik Üniversitesi, Trabzon, 24-25 Mart 2011. Birleşmiş Milletler Deniz Hukuku Sözleşmesi, Çeviren: Aydoğan Özman, İstanbul 1984; 21 ILM 1261 (1982),
UN, Montego Bay. H.S. CANCA, Devletlerin Gemilere Müdahale Yetki ve Yükümlülükleri, Seçkin Yayıncılık, Ankara 2015.
R.R. CHURCHILL AND A.V. LOWE, The Law of the Sea, 3rd edition, 1999. Council of Europe, B. Aurescu, Comments On The Law On Occupied Territories Of Georgia, European Commission For Democracy Through Law (Venice Commission), Opinion no. 516/2009, Strasbourg, 4 March 2009. M.D. FINK, Contemporary Views on the Lawfulness of Naval Blockades, Aegean Review of the Law of the Sea and Maritime Law, 2011, s.196. http://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s12180-011-0021-y (26.01.2015). D. GUILFOYLE, The Mavi Marmara Incident and Blockade in Armed Conflict, The British Yearbook of International Law, Vol. 81, No. 1, 2011. S. KAPANADZE, Turkish Trade with Abkhazia: An Apple Of Discord For Georgia, Turkish Policy Quarterly, Volume 3, Number3, 2014, p.56. http://www.turkishpolicy.com/article/1011/turkish-tradewith-abkhazia-an-apple-of-discord-for-georgia-fall-2014 (25.01.2015). U. LEANZA/M.C. CARACCIOLO, The Exclusive Economic Zone, The IMLI Manual on International Maritime Law: Volume I: The Law of the Sea, Oxford University Press, 2014. Lotus Davası; PCIJ Series A 1927 No. 9 at p. 25. J. N. MOORE, Background on the Freedom of Navigation, Edited Transcript of Questions and Answer Session Panel I. Report of the Secretary-Generals Panel of Inquiry on the 31 May 2010 Flotilla Incident September 2011, http://www.un.org/News/ dh/infocus/ middle_east/ Gaza_ Flotilla_Panel_Report.pdf (25.01.2015). San Remo Manual on International Law Applicable to Armed Conflicts at Sea, Edited by L. Doswald-Beck, Cambridge University Press, 1995. H.G. SARI, Avrupa İnsan Hakları Sözleşmesi Kapsamında Mülkiyet Hakkı Perspektifinden Devletlerin Gemilere El Koyma Yetkisi; Örnek Dava İncelemesi, Uluslararası Deniz Hukukunda Kıyı Devletinin Gemilere El Koyma Yetkisinin Sınırları Sempozyumu, Karadeniz Teknik Üniversitesi, Trabzon, 24-25 Mart 2011. San Remo Manual on International Law Applicable to Armed Conflicts at Sea, Edited by L. Doswald-Beck, Cambridge University Press, 1995.