Journals / Üçüncü Sektör Kooperatifçilik / 2009 / Cilt: 44 - Sayı: 4

The analysis of interactional justice and performance: An example of banking sector

Etkileşim adaleti ile iş performansı arasındaki ilişkinin incelenmesi:Bankacılık sektörü örneği

Pages
19–31
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

The justice and performance questions were filled out by the employees.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:With increasing globalization and international competition, the importance of managing resources that can help to increase competitiveness of organizations has become a important factor in the success of all industries.
📊
Key Findings & Data:This study attempts to explore the relationships among organizational justice and employee performance of banks in Turkey, which general directors of setteled in Ankara.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:The justice and performance questions were filled out by the employees.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:performans · performance

Abstract

With increasing globalization and international competition, the importance of managing resources that can help to increase competitiveness of organizations has become a important factor in the success of all industries. Especially, human resources play a central role in the services sector. The study of workplace justice has been rapidly growing in recent years. Justice perceptions have long been considered as explanatory variables in organizational research. This study attempts to explore the relationships among organizational justice and employee performance of banks in Turkey, which general directors of setteled in Ankara. Organizational justice includes distributive justice, procedural justice and interactional justice.Empirically verifying the interactionaljustice and job performance relationships, this study selected four firms in bank businesses of Turkey as the sample. Two hundred-eleven full-time employees volunteered to participate in the experiment. The justice and performance questions were filled out by the employees.

Özet

Küreselleşme ve uluslararası rekabetin artmasıyla, bütün endüstri kollarının başarısında ve tüm organizasyonlarda söz konusu rekabetçiliğe ivme kazandıracak kaynakların yönetimi önemli bir konudur. Özellikle hizmet sektöründe insan kaynaklarının rolü çok önemlidir. Son yıllarda örgütsel adalet çalışmaları da bu bağlamda artış göstermektedir. Adalet bakış açısı örgütsel araştırmalar içerisinde önemli yaklaşımlarla birlikte değişik örneklendirmeleri de içermektedir. Bu çalışma, Türkiye'de faaliyet gösteren ve genel müdürlükleri Ankara 'da olan dört adet bankada görev yapan çalışanların, örgütsel adalet ye iş performansı arasındaki ilişkileri algılama şekillerini ortaya koymak amacıyla yapılmıştır. Örgütsel adalet temel olarak, prosedürel adalet, dağıtım adaleti ve etkileşim adaleti olarak kısımlandırılabilir. Çalışma, etkileşim adaletinin ampirik olarak ele alınması ve iş performansı ile olan ilişkileri kapsamında söz konusu dört bankanın Ankara merkez şubelerinde görev yapan toplam ikiyüzonbir tam zamanlı çalışanı hedef kitle olarak belirlemiştir. Gerçekleştirilen anket çalışmasına katılım gönüllük esasına göre sağlanmıştır. Bu kapsamda anket soruları bizzat çalışanlarca doldurulmuştur.

🔖

Cite This Article

USLU, Y. D. (2009). The analysis of interactional justice and performance: An example of banking sector. Üçüncü Sektör Kooperatifçilik, Cilt: 44 - Sayı: 4, 19–31. https://ajindex.com/articles/320502

References (12)

  1. Adkıns, Cheryl L. ve Craig J. Russel (1997). 'Supervisor-Subordinate Work Value Congruence and Subordinate Performance: a Pilot Study'. Journal of Business and Psychology, 12:2, 205-218.
  2. Anton, J. (1996).Customer Relationship Management, London: Prentice Hall Barlmg, J., and P. Michelle, (1993), "Interactional, Formal, and Distributive Justice in The Workplace: An Exploratory Study", The Journal of Psychology, 127(6), pp. 649-656.
  3. Baron, R. M., & Kenny, D. A. (1986). The Moderator-Mediator Variable Distinction İn Social Psychological Research: Conceptual, Strategic, And Statistical Considerations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51,1173- 1182. Beugre, C. D. (2002). 'Understanding Organizational Justice and Its Impact on Managing Employees: An African Perspective', The International Journal of Human Resource Management, 13:7 November, 1091 -1104. Bıes, R.J. (2001). "Interactional Justice: The Sacred and The Profane", in Greenberg J. and CRAPANZANO, R. (Ed.) Advances in Organizational Justice, Stanford University Pres., pp.89-118.
  4. Cohen, R.L. (1987). "Distributive Justice: Theory and Research", Social Justice Research, 1(1) pp. 19-40.
  5. Cropanzano, R. and R. Folger(1991). "Procedural Justice and Worker Motivation" in R. Steers and L. Porter (Ed.), Motivation and Work Behavior, New York: McGraw-Hill, pp. 131-143.
  6. Deconmck, J.B., Stilwell, D.C. (2004).
  7. Incorporating Organizational Justice, Role States, Pay Satisfaction And Supervisor satisfaction in a model of turnover intentions. Journal of Business Research, 57, 225-231
  8. Erdinç, S.B. (2009). "Turizm İşletmelerinde Çalışan Muhasebe Personelinin Örgütsel Adalet Algılamaları ve Adalet Türlerinin Performans Üzerindeki Etkilerinin İncelenmesi", 17. Ulusal Yönetim ve Organizasyon Kongresi Bildiri Kitabı, 21-23
  9. Mayıs, Eskişehir, s: 165-170.
  10. Greenslade, Jaımı H, Jımmıeson, Nerına L.(2007). Distinguishing Between Task And Contextual Performance For Nurses: Development Of A Job Performance Scale, Journal of Advanced Nursing. 58(6):602- 611, Greenberg, J. (1996). The Quest for Justice on the Job: Essays and Experiments. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications. Konovsky, Mary A. (2000). 'Understanding Procedural Justice and Its Impact on Business Organizations'. Journal of Management, Vol. 26, No. 3,489-511.
  11. Luis R. Gomez-Mejia(1995).
  12. Managing Human Resources, London: Prentice Hall International Ros M., Shalom H. Shvartz Ve Shoshana Surkiss (1999). 'Basic Individual Values, Work Values, and the Meaning of Work',