Journals / Selçuk Üniversitesi Beden Eğitimi ve Spor Bilim Dergisi / 2011 / Cilt: 13 - Sayı: 2

Relative strength, body mass and height as predictors of olympic weightlifting payers performance

Pages
166–171
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

The interesting for muscle strength development especially the maximum strength for weightlifting players by indicative relative strength indicate to achieve the correlated between it and between the Body mass and height.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:The research aims to know the relationship between relative strength, Body mass and height with Olympic weightlifting player's performance and the contribution percentage for the relative strength, Body mass and height in performance for weightlifting players during Olympic Games.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Applied this research on weightlifting Olympic players results in Sydney 2000, Athens 2004 and Beijing 2008.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:The interesting for muscle strength development especially the maximum strength for weightlifting players by indicative relative strength indicate to achieve the correlated between it and between the Body mass and height.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:2000 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

The research aims to know the relationship between relative strength, Body mass and height with Olympic weightlifting player's performance and the contribution percentage for the relative strength, Body mass and height in performance for weightlifting players during Olympic Games. Applied this research on weightlifting Olympic players results in Sydney 2000, Athens 2004 and Beijing 2008. The numbers of players (397) Olympic weightlifting players they calculation their results in Olympic Games and they represent (80.52%) from the original community, average age (25.80 ± 4.52) year, average Height (170.76 ± 9.71) cm, and average weight (85.19 ± 25.07) kg. The Results that provided statistical indicative relationship between the relative strength, Body mass and height with Olympic weightlifting players performance. Shifted so that contribution percentage for the relative strength (13.1%), contribution percentage for Body mass (38.6%), and the contribution for the height (43.6%) In Olympic Games weightlifting players performance. It can predict level number for weightlifting players with indication the relative strength, Body mass and height. The interesting for muscle strength development especially the maximum strength for weightlifting players by indicative relative strength indicate to achieve the correlated between it and between the Body mass and height.

🔖

Cite This Article

EBADA, K. A. (2011). Relative strength, body mass and height as predictors of olympic weightlifting payers performance. Selçuk Üniversitesi Beden Eğitimi ve Spor Bilim Dergisi, Cilt: 13 - Sayı: 2, 166–171. https://ajindex.com/articles/317765

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (1)

  1. Abdel-fattah, AB.: Sports training Physiology references in physical education and fitness 3, El-fekr Alaraby library, Cairo, 2003. 2. Al-desoky, M.: the contribution percentages in level number for muscles power output of categories of performances for both snatch and clean and jerk lifts for weightlifting players. Master search physical Education of sport, mansora university, 2006. 3. Christian, H.: Objektive Ueberpruefung des kalkulationsmusters der motion power console 500 von der firma emotion fitness zur Ermittlung des startgwichtes beim apparativen krafttraining sowie die Angabe weiterfuehrenden Empfehlungen. Diplomarbeit, kluesserath, Germany, 2007. 4. Ebada, KH.: Growth equation as a mark to the Prediction of Olympic Players results of Weightlifting Sport. The first scientific conference "sport University in Arab countries from 6-7 Feb 2006. Physical Education of sport - Mansoura University, 2006. 5. Ebada, KH.: Die Probleme des Trainings von Gewichthebern kindes- und Jugendalter. Dissertation, Germany, 2003, 60-63. 6. Ford, E., Alvin, J. Detterline, K.; wenyuan, C.: Gender- and height-related limits of muscle strength in world weightlifting champions. J Appl Physiol, 2000, 89: 1061–1064. 7. Haleczko, A.: Indices of the Relative Strength Fitness of the Disabled Weightlifters. Kinesiology, 2001,11(22): 21-25. ICID: 471754. 8. Hare, D.: Principles of Sports Training Introduction to the Theory and Method of Training”, Berlin, 1992. 9. Hollmann, W. and Hettinger, T.: Sportmedizin. 4auflage schattauer verlagsgesellschaft mb Hstuttgart, Germany, 2000. 10. Kanyevsky,V.: The Dependence Between the Weightlifter's Absolute and Relative Strength on Weight Class. Translated by Andrew Charniga, Jr. The Russian weightlifting library. Sportivny, Press. Russian. http://www.dynamiceleiko.com /sportivny/ library/ news/nv006.html, 2003. 11. Kauhanen, H.; Komi, P.; Häkkinen, K.: Standardization and validation of the body weight adjustment regression equations in Olympic weightlifting. J. Strength Cond. Res. 2002, 16(1):58–74. 12. Mochernyuk, V, Draga V. Determining the Dependence between Weightlifting Results in Different Weight Classes. Translated by Andrew Charniga, Jr. The Russian weightlifting library. Sportivny, Press. Russian. http://www. dynamiceleiko. com/sportivny/library /farti cles 001. html, 2001. 13. Stone, M.; Sands, W.; Pierce, K.; Carlock, J.; Cardinale, M.; Newton, R.: Relationship of Maximum Strength to Weightlifting Performance. Medicine & Scien