Journals / Selçuk Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi Sosyal ve Ekonomik Araştırmalar Dergisi / 2009 / Cilt: 9 - Sayı: 18

Pozitif ve negatif duygusallığın çalışanların performansları üzerindeki etkisi

Pages
165–190
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

The results suggest that positive and negative affectivity of individuals have an significant main effect on their performance.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:This research was accomplished in order to define the effects of individual affectivity or emotions on their performance in organizational life based on Affective Events Theory.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Both affectivity and performance divided into two; the construct of affectivity divided into positive and negative and the construct of performance into task and contextual.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:The results suggest that positive and negative affectivity of individuals have an significant main effect on their performance.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

This research was accomplished in order to define the effects of individual affectivity or emotions on their performance in organizational life based on Affective Events Theory. Both affectivity and performance divided into two; the construct of affectivity divided into positive and negative and the construct of performance into task and contextual. Results from studies on 392 nurses at Erciyes University Hospitals reveal that positive affectivity has positive relationship with task performance (R=0.733) and contextual performance (R=0.433) and has positive effects on both performance dimensions. So did negative affectivity in negative with task performance (R=-0.780) and contextual performance (R=-0.142). The results suggest that positive and negative affectivity of individuals have an significant main effect on their performance.

Özet

Bu çalışma Duygusal Olaylar Teorisi'ne dayanılarak bireylerin duygularının veya duygusallıklarının örgütsel yaşamdaki performansları üzerindeki etkisini belirlemeye yönelik olarak yapılmıştır. Duygular pozitif ve negatif olmak üzere ikiye ve performans da görev ve bağlamsal olmak üzere yine ikiye ayrılmıştır. Kayseri'de Erciyes Üniversitesi hastanelerinde görev yapan 392 hemşire üzerinde yapılan araştırmanın sonuçlarına göre pozitif duygusallığın görev performansı (R=0.733) ve bağlamsal performans (R=0.433) ile pozitif yönlü bir ilişkisi olduğu ve performansları pozitif yönde etkilediği belirlenmiştir. Negatif duygusallık ise görev performansı (R= -0.780) ve bağlamsal performans (R=-0.142) ile negatif yönlü bir ilişki içindedir ve performanslar üzerindeki etkisi negatiftir. Araştırma sonuçlarına göre bireylerin pozitif ve negatif duygularının performanslarını anlamlı bir şekilde etkilediği anlaşılmıştır.

🔖

Cite This Article

DOĞAN, Y., ÖZDEVECİOĞLU, M. (2009). Pozitif ve negatif duygusallığın çalışanların performansları üzerindeki etkisi. Selçuk Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi Sosyal ve Ekonomik Araştırmalar Dergisi, Cilt: 9 - Sayı: 18, 165–190. https://ajindex.com/articles/314755

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (11)

  1. Akdoğan, Asuman., Özdevecioğlu Mahmut, Oflazer, Selen Mirap (2005); "Duygusal Olaylar Teorisi Çerçevesinde Pozitif ve Negatif Duygusallığın Çalışanların Performansları Üzerindeki Etkisi", 13. Yönetim ve Organizasyon Kongresi, İstanbul, ss. 119-125.
  2. Borman, Walter C, Stephen J. Motowidlo (1993); Expanding The Criterion Domain to Include Elements of Contextual Performance, (Schmitt & W. C. Borman Eds.), Personnel Selection in Organizations, San Francisco, CA: Jossey Bass. Borman, Walter C; Stephan J. Motowidlo (1997); "Task Performance and Contextual Performance: the Meaning for Personnel Selection Research", Human Performance, Vol.10, ss. 99-1.09. Brief, Arthur P.; M. J. Burke; J. M. George et A1 (1988), "Should Negative Affectivity Remain An Unmeasured Variable in the Study of Job Stress?" Journal of Applied Psychology,Vol.73, ss. 193-198.
  3. Brief, Arthur P.; Stephan J. Motowidlo (1986), "Prosocial Organizational Behaviors", Academy of Management Review, Vol.11, ss. 710-725.
  4. Cardy, Robert L.; Gregory H. Dobbins (1986), "Affect and Appraisal Accuracy: Liking As An Integral Dimension in Evaluating Performance", Journal of Applied Psychology, Vol. 71, ss. 672-678. Cary L. Cooper; Joanne G. Marshall (1976), "Occupational Sources of Stress: A Review of the Literature Relative to Coronary Heart Disease and Mental 111 Health", Journal of Occupational Psychology, Vol. 49, ss. 11-28.
  5. Conway, James M. (1999), "Distinguishing Contextual Performance from Task Performance for Managerial Jobs", Journal of Applied Psychology, Vol. 84, No. 1, ss. 3-13.
  6. Diamond, Lisa M.; Lisa G. Aspinwall (2003), "Emotion Regulation Across the Life Span: An integrative Perspective Emphasizing Self-Regulation, Positive Affect, and Dyadic Processes", Motivation and Emotion, Vol. 27, No. 2, ss. 125-156.
  7. Forgas, Joseph (1995), "Mood and Judgment: the Affective infusion Model (Aim)", Psychology Bulletin, Vol. 117, ss. 39-66.
  8. Forgas, Joseph (1990), Gordon H. Bower; S. Moylan; "Praise Or Blame - Affective Influences On Attributions for Achievement", Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, Vol. 59, ss. 809-819.
  9. Fredrickson, Barbara L.; Thomas Joiner (1998), "Positive Emotions Speed Recovery from the Cardiovascular Sequelae of Negative Emotions", Cognition & Emotion, Vol. 12, No. 2, ss. 191-220.
  10. Fredrickson, Barbara L.; Thomas Joiner (2*002),"Positive Emotions Trigger Upward Spirals Toward Emotional Well-Being", Psychological Science, Vol. 13, ss. 172-175.
  11. Furnham, Adrian; Schaeffer Robert (19