Journals / İstanbul Üniversitesi Siyasal Bilgiler Fakültesi Dergisi / 2013 / Sayı: 48

İKTİSAT VE DENEYSEL YÖNTEM: DENEYLER, TARTIŞMALAR VE GELECEK

Pages
0
Publication Date
2013-12-11
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

The most important contribution to the economic theories of these experimental studies in economics is that it helps in finding the answer to the question to what extent economics theories are valid in real life.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:The use of experimental method in the world of economics, particularly because of that economic behavior is quite complex and human modeling is shaped by homo economicus, was met with great resistance for a long time.
📊
Key Findings & Data:But human modeling of economics was widely criticized in the 1940 and experimental studies on market structures have been taking first steps since then.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:The most important contribution to the economic theories of these experimental studies in economics is that it helps in finding the answer to the question to what extent economics theories are valid in real life.
🔬Design:Modeling & Simulation
📍Scope:2002 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Deneysel İktisat · Alan Deneyleri · Laboratuar Deneyleri

Abstract

The use of experimental method in the world of economics, particularly because of that economic behavior is quite complex and human modeling is shaped by homo economicus, was met with great resistance for a long time. But human modeling of economics was widely criticized in the 1940 and experimental studies on market structures have been taking first steps since then. This process led to experimental studies of individual decision-making in the 1960s and 70s. The importance of these studies has been noticed and a Nobel Prize was given to Vernon Smith for his contributions to experimental economics by Nobel Committee in 2002. The most important contribution to the economic theories of these experimental studies in economics is that it helps in finding the answer to the question to what extent economics theories are valid in real life.

Özet

İktisat dünyasında deneysel yöntemin kullanımı özellikle iktisadi davranışların oldukça karmaşık özelliklere sahip olması ve homo economicus ile şekillenen insan modellemesi nedeniyle uzun yıllar büyük bir dirençle karşılaşmıştır. Fakat 1940'larda iktisadın bu insan modellemesine yönelik eleştiriler yüksek sesle ifade edilmeye başlanmış ve piyasa yapılarına yönelik deneysel çalışmalar ile bu konuda ilk adımlar atılmıştır. 1960 ve 70'lerde bireysel karar verme üzerine yapılan deneysel çalışmalar ile de bu süreç hızlanmıştır. Bu çalışmaların önemi Nobel Komitesi'nin 2002 yıllında deneysel iktisatta yaptığı katkılardan dolayı Vernon Smith'e ödül vermesiyle de tescillenmiştir. İktisatta yapılan bu deneysel çalışmaların en önemli katkısı iktisat teorilerinin gerçek hayatta ne derece geçerli olduğu sorusunun cevabını bulmada yardımcı olmasıdır.

🔖

Cite This Article

BASILGAN, M. (2013). İKTİSAT VE DENEYSEL YÖNTEM: DENEYLER, TARTIŞMALAR VE GELECEK. İstanbul Üniversitesi Siyasal Bilgiler Fakültesi Dergisi, Sayı: 48, 0. https://ajindex.com/articles/31471

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (1)

  1. ALLAIS, Maurice (1953), “Le Comportement de l’Homme Rationnel devant le Risque: Critique des Postulats et Axiomes de l’Ecole Americaine (The Behavior of the Rational Man under Risk: Critique of the Postulates and Axioms of the American School)”, Econometrica, Vol.21, No.4, s.503-546. • BACON, Francis (2000), The New Organon (Translated by L. Jardine-M. Silverthorne), Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (Original work published 1814). • BRACHT, GLENN H. and GLASS, GENE V. (1968), “The External Validity of Experiments”, American Educational Research Journal, Vol. 5, No:4, s. 437-474. • BROOKSHIRE, David, COURSEY, Don L. and SCHULZE, William D. (1987), “The External Validity of Experimental Economics Techniques: Analysis of Demand Behavior”, Economic Inquiry, Vol.25, No: 2, s.239-50. • STEPHEN, Burks, CARPENTER, Jeffrey and GOETTE, Lorenz (2009), “Performance Pay and Worker Cooperation: Evidence from an Artefactual Feld Experiment”, Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Vol.70, No:3, s. 458-469. • BLAUG, Mark (1992), The Methodology of Economics or How Economists Explain, 2nd ed., Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. • BUTLER, David J. and HEY, John D. (1987), “Experimental Economics: An introduction”, Empirica, Vol.14, s.157-186. • CAGINALP, Gunduz, MCCABE, Kevin and PORTER, David (2003), “The Foundations of Experimental Economics and Applications to Behavioral Finance: The Contributions of Nobel Laureate Vernon Smith”, Journal of Behavioral Finance, Vol.4, No:1, s. 3-6. • CAMERER, Colin F. and HOGARTH, Robin M. (1999), “The Effects of Financial Incentives in Experiments: A Review and Capital-Labor-Production Framework”, Journal of Risk and Uncertainty, Vol.19, No:1, s.7-42. • CARPENTER, Jeffrey P., HARRISON, Glenn W. and LIST, John A. (2005), “Field Experiments in Economics: An Introduction”, Research in Experimental Economics, Vol.10, s. 1-16. • CHAMBERLIN, Edward H. (1948), “An Experimental Imperfect Market”, The Journal of Political Economy, Vol.56, No:2, s. 95-108. • CHAUDHURI, Ananish (2009), Experiments in Economics: Playing Fair with Money, Routledge, London and New York. • CHEW, Soo Hong and MacCrimmon, Kenneth R.(1979), “Alpha-Nu Choice Theory: A Generalization of Expected Utility Theory”, Working Paper, No. 669, University of British Columbia, Vancouver. • CROSON, Rachel and GÄCHTER, Simon (2010), “The Science of Experimental Economics”, Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Vol.73, s.122-131. • CUNNINGHAM, Robert L. (1967), “