Journals / Spor Hekimliği Dergisi / 2018 / Cilt: 53 - Sayı: 1

Plantar Fasiitli Rekreasyonel Sporcularda Proloterapi Uygulamasının Etkinliği

The Effects of Prolotherapy in Recreational Athletes with Plantar Fasciitis

Pages
37–46
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Conclusion: According to the results of the research, one can conclude that the application of prolotherapy provides symptomatic and functional improvement in recreational athletes with plantar fasciitis.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Objectives: In this study; it was tried to examine the efficacy of the prolotherapy method in the treatment of recreational athletes who have plantar fasciitis and to determine its place in the treatment.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Thirty recreational athletes who were aged 25 to 50, had pain for at least six months, and who have not been healed by conservative treatment were included in the study.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Conclusion: According to the results of the research, one can conclude that the application of prolotherapy provides symptomatic and functional improvement in recreational athletes with plantar fasciitis.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Objectives: In this study; it was tried to examine the efficacy of the prolotherapy method in the treatment of recreational athletes who have plantar fasciitis and to determine its place in the treatment. Material and Methods: Of the patients who were admitted to the polyclinic with heel pain, the ones diagnosed with unilateral plantar fasciitis were determined. Thirty recreational athletes who were aged 25 to 50, had pain for at least six months, and who have not been healed by conservative treatment were included in the study. Patients were evaluated by visual pain scale, foot and ankle outcome score and balance coordination test. These evaluations were made before the treatment and three months following the first application. The extremities that patients did not complaint about were used as the control side. A 15% dextrose solution was preferred as proliferating agent for prolotherapy. In total, injections were made at seven points (to the beginning and end of plantar fascias). The same procedure was repeated two weeks later. Results: When pre- and post-treatment values were compared; a statistically significant difference was found between the scores of visual pain scale, foot and ankle outcome score and balance coordination test (p<0.01). Conclusion: According to the results of the research, one can conclude that the application of prolotherapy provides symptomatic and functional improvement in recreational athletes with plantar fasciitis. Prolotherapy application seems to be an alternative treatment method in patients who have not been healed by conservative treatment

Özet

Amaç: Bu çalışmada; proloterapi yönteminin, plantar fasiitli rekreasyonel sporcuların tedavisindeki etkinliğinin incelenmesi ve tedavideki yerinin belirlenmesine çalışıldı. Gereç ve Yöntemler: Polikliniğe topuk ağrısı ile başvuran hastalardan tek taraflı plantar fasiit tanısı konulanlar belirlendi. Çalışmaya 25-50 yaş aralığında, en az altı aydır yakınması bulunan, konservatif tedaviden fayda görmeyen 30 rekreasyonel sporcu dahil edildi. Hastalar görsel ağrı ölçeği, ayak-ayak bileği araştırması ve denge koordinasyon testi ile değerlendirildi. Bu değerlendirmeler tedavi öncesi ve ilk uygulamadan üç ay sonra yapıldı. Hastaların yakınma belirtmedikleri ekstremiteleri kontrol olarak kullanıldı. Proloterapi uygulaması için proliferan madde olarak %15'lik dekstroz çözeltisi tercih edildi. Toplamda yedi noktaya (plantar fasya başlangıcına ve sonlanma noktalarına) enjeksiyon uygulandı. Aynı uygulama iki hafta sonra tekrarlandı. Bulgular: Tedavi öncesi ve tedavi sonrası değerler karşılaştırıldığında; görsel ağrı ölçeği, ayak-ayak bileği araştırması ve denge koordinasyon testi değerleri arasında istatistiksel olarak anlamlı fark saptandı (p<0.01). Sonuç: Ulaşılan sonuçlar ışığında, proloterapi uygulamasının plantar fasiitli rekreasyonel sporcularda semptomatik ve fonksiyonel iyileşme sağladığı ifade edilebilir. Proloterapi uygulaması konservatif tedaviden fayda görmeyen olgularda alternatif bir yöntem olarak görünmektedir

🔖

Cite This Article

APAYDIN, A. H., ÖRSÇELİK, A., YILDIZ, Y. (2018). Plantar Fasiitli Rekreasyonel Sporcularda Proloterapi Uygulamasının Etkinliği. Spor Hekimliği Dergisi, Cilt: 53 - Sayı: 1, 37–46. https://ajindex.com/articles/313488

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (1)

  1. Rompe JD. Plantar fasciopathy. Sports% Med% Arthrosc. 2009 Jun;17(2):100P4. Neufeld SK, Cerrato R. Plantar fasciitis: evaluation and treatment. J%Am%Acad%Orthop%Surg. 2008;16(6):338P46. Wearing SC, Smeathers JE, Urry SR, et al. The pathoP mechanics of plantar fasciitis. Sports%Med. 2006;36(7): 585P611. Goff JD, Crawford R. Diagnosis and treatment of plantar fasciitis. Am%Fam%Physician. 2011;84(6):676P82. Rosenbaum AJ, DiPreta JA, Misener D. Plantar heel pain. Med%Clin%North%Am. 2014;98(2):339P52. Buchbinder R. Clinical practice. Plantar fasciitis. N%Engl% J%Med. 2004;350(21):2159P66. Toomey EP. Plantar heel pain. Foot% Ankle% Clin. 2009;14(2):229P45. Acevedo JI, Beskin JL. Complications of plantar fascia rupture associated with corticosteroid injection. Foot% Ankle%Int. 1998;19(2):91P7. Dyck DD Jr, BoyajianPO’Neill LA. Plantar fasciitis. Clin%J% Sport%Med. 2004;14(5):305P9. DeChellis DM, Cortazzo MH. Regenerative medicine in the field of pain medicine: Prolotherapy, plateletPrich plasma therapy, and stem cell therapyPTheory and evidence. Techniques% in% Regional% Anesthesia% and% Pain% Management. 2011;15(2):74P80. Yildiz Y, Apaydin AH, Seven MM, et al. The effects of prolotherapy (hypertonic dextrose) in recreational athletes with patellofemoral pain syndrome. J%Exp%Integr% Med. 2016;6(2):53P6. Weiss L. Prolotherapy. In: Weiss L, Silver JK, Lennard TA, Weiss JM, Eds. Easy%Injections. Philadelphia: ButterworthP Heinemann; 2007. p. 166P71. Nair LS. Prolotherapy for tissue repair. Transl% Res. 2011;158(3):129P31. Rabago D, Slattengren A, Zgierska A. Prolotherapy in primary care practice. Prim%Care. 2010;37(1):65P80. Parraca JA, Olivares PR, Carbonell Baeza A, et al. TestP Retest reliability of Biodex Balance SD on physically active old people. J.%Hum%Sport%Exerc. 2011;6(2):444P51. Smith BS, Burton B, Johnson D, et al. Effects of wearing athletic shoes, five toed shoes, and standing barefoot on balance performance in young adults. Int% J% Sports% Phys%Ther. 2015;10(1):69P74. Roos EM, Brandsson S, Karlsson J. Validation of the foot and ankle outcome score for ankle ligament reconstruction. Foot%Ankle%Int. 2001;22(10):788P94. Karatepe AG, Günaydın R, Kaya T, et al. Validation of the Turkish version of the foot and ankle outcome score. Rheumatol%Int. 2009;30(2):169P73. Riddle DL, Schappert SM. Volume of ambulatory care visits and patterns of care for patients diagnosed with plantar fasciitis: a national study of medical doctors. Foot%Ankle%Int. 2004;25(5):303P10