Journals / Su Ürünleri Dergisi / 2012 / Cilt: 29 - Sayı: 2

Ege Denizi İzmir İç Körfez’de (Türkiye) amatör balıkçılığın ekonomik değeri üzerine bir ön çalışma

A preliminary study on economic value of recreational fishing in İzmir Inner Bay, aegean sea (Turkey)

Pages
55–62
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Calculated consumer surplus per individual, 25 Turkish Liras and existence of 7,669 licensed recreational fishers in İzmir Province according to official data represent the enormous economic value of recreational fishing in İzmir Inner Bay.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:: This study on recreational fishing characteristics and economic valuation in İzmir Inner Bay is intended to provide fisheries management information for the decision makers.
📊
Key Findings & Data:With the on-site face-to-face interviews with 50 shore-based recreational fishermen in the period of January-June, 2011, it was aimed to demonstrate demographics, fishing related expenditures (fishing equipment, transportation, bait and special costs such as food and drinks), market and nonmarket economic value of recreational fishing.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Calculated consumer surplus per individual, 25 Turkish Liras and existence of 7,669 licensed recreational fishers in İzmir Province according to official data represent the enormous economic value of recreational fishing in İzmir Inner Bay.
🔬Design:Modeling & Simulation
📍Scope:2011 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

: This study on recreational fishing characteristics and economic valuation in İzmir Inner Bay is intended to provide fisheries management information for the decision makers. With the on-site face-to-face interviews with 50 shore-based recreational fishermen in the period of January-June, 2011, it was aimed to demonstrate demographics, fishing related expenditures (fishing equipment, transportation, bait and special costs such as food and drinks), market and nonmarket economic value of recreational fishing. Then, fishing participation dimensions was planned to consider who participate, when the participation occurs, how much time they spend. Non-market benefits rising from recreational fishing was planned to represent via travel cost methodology, whereas negative binomial model was estimated to calculate non-market benefits. Calculated consumer surplus per individual, 25 Turkish Liras and existence of 7,669 licensed recreational fishers in İzmir Province according to official data represent the enormous economic value of recreational fishing in İzmir Inner Bay.

Özet

: İzmir İç Körfez’deki rekreasyonel balıkçılığın özelliklerini ve ekonomik değerlemesini ele alan bu çalışma, karar vericilere balıkçılık yönetimi konusunda bilgi sağlamayı amaçlamaktadır. 2011 Ocak-Haziran döneminde kıyıdan avlanan 50 rekreasyonel balıkçı ile yapılan yüz yüze görüşmeler sonucu, rekreasyonel balıkçıların demografisi, balıkçılıkla ilgili harcamaları (balıkçılık ekipmanı, ulaşım, yem ve yiyecek ve içecek gibi özel masraflar), bu aktiviteden elde ettikleri pazar ve pazar dışı ekonomik değerleri ele alınmıştır. Ardından kim, ne zaman, nerede katılıyor ve ne kadar zaman harcıyor gibi sorularla balıkçılık aktivitesine katılım ile ilgili özelliklerinin irdelenmesi planlanmıştır. Pazar dışı faydaları hesaplamak için Negatif Binomial Regresyon Model’den yararlanılırken, seyahat maliyeti yöntemiyle de rekreasyonel balıkçılıktan kaynaklanan pazar dışı faydaların sunulması hedeflenmiştir. Her birey için hesaplanan 25 liralık tüketici rantı ve resmi verilere göre İzmir İli’nde 7.669 lisanslı rekreasyonel balıkçı varlığı, İzmir İç Körfez’deki rekreasyonel balıkçlığın büyük ekonomik değerini ortaya koymaktadır

🔖

Cite This Article

TUNCA, S., ÜNAL, V., MİRAN, B. (2012). Ege Denizi İzmir İç Körfez’de (Türkiye) amatör balıkçılığın ekonomik değeri üzerine bir ön çalışma. Su Ürünleri Dergisi, Cilt: 29 - Sayı: 2, 55–62. https://ajindex.com/articles/311910

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (4)

  1. Anonymous, 2008. No: 2/2 notification of regulations on marine and inland recreational fisheries in Turkey (in Turkish). Notification Number: 2008/49. Ankara,
  2. Republic of Turkey, General Directorate of Fisheries Conservation and Control, 112 p. Başar, H., 2007. The Recreational Use and The Economic Value of Dilek Peninsula-Great Meander Delta National Park by Travel Cost Method (in Turkish with English abstract). Master of Science Thesis, Ege University Graduate School of Natural and Applied Sciences, 123 p. Belkayalı, N., Akpınar, N., 2009. Determination of the economic value of recreational and tourism use value of the Yalova Thermal Spring via travel cost method (in Turkish with English abstract). Coğrafi Bilimler Dergisi, 7(2):177-184.
  3. Bilgic, A., Florkowski, W.J., 2007. Application of a hurdle negative binomial count data model to demand for bass fishing in the southeastern United States. Journal of Environmental Management, 83(4):478-490. doi:10.1016/j.jenvman.2006.10.009 Creel, M.D., Loomis, J.B., 1990. Theoretical and empirical advantages of truncated count data estimators for analysis of deer hunting in California. American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 72 p. doi:10.2307/1242345 Dillon, B., 2004. A bio-economic review of recreational angling for bass (Dicentrachus labrax). Report prepared for East Riding of Yorkshire Council Integrated Coastal Zone Management Group. Scarborough Centre for Coastal Studies, University of Hull, 24 p. Erdoğan, N., Salalı, H.E., Atış, E., Miran, B., 2007. Economic value of Izmir Culture Park. International Conference on Environment Survival and Sustainability, Abstracts Book, February 19-24,
  4. Near East University, Lefkoşe, KKTC, 304 p. Food and Agriculture Organization (FAO), European Inland Fisheries Advisory Commission (EIFAC), 2008. Code of Practice for Recreational Fisheries. EIFAC Occasional Paper, No. 42, Rome, FAO, 45 p. Gaudin, C., De Young, C., 2007. Recreational fisheries in the Mediterranean countries: a review of existing legal frameworks. Studies and Reviews, General Fisheries Commission for the Mediterranean, No. 81, Rome, FAO, 85 p General Fisheries Commission for The Mediterranean (GFCM), 2010. Report of the Transversal Workshop on the Monitoring of Recreational Fisheries in The GFCM Area. Scientific Advisory Committee 13th Session. Palma de Mallorca, Spain. 30 p. Gillig, D., Ozuna, Jr.T., Griffin, W.L., 2000. The value of the Gulf of Mexico recreational red snapper fishery. Marine Resource Economic