Journals / Su Ürünleri Dergisi / 2013 / Cilt: 30 - Sayı: 4

Rekreasyonel balıkçılığın faydalarının değerlemesi: Ordu örneği

Valuation of recreational fishing benefits: A snapshot from Ordu, Turkey

Pages
147–154
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

In conclusion, it was determined that recreational fishing in Ordu has economically big impact in the region.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Recreational fishing in coastal areas plays an important role in the economic development of Turkey.
📊
Key Findings & Data:In this study, non-market economic value of recreational fishing activities by using Contingent Valuation (31,500 Turkish Liras: TL) and Travel Cost (504,000 TL) Methodologies was calculated in Ordu Province.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:In conclusion, it was determined that recreational fishing in Ordu has economically big impact in the region.
🔬Design:Modeling & Simulation
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Recreational fishing in coastal areas plays an important role in the economic development of Turkey. In this study, non-market economic value of recreational fishing activities by using Contingent Valuation (31,500 Turkish Liras: TL) and Travel Cost (504,000 TL) Methodologies was calculated in Ordu Province. The factors affecting the respondent’s Willingness-to-Pay via Tobit Regression Model and the factors affecting individual travel cost via Negative Binomial Model was assessed. Beside determining non-market benefits, socioeconomic, demographic and fishing dimensions of recreational fishermen were also queried to provide better understanding of recreational fishing profile. In conclusion, it was determined that recreational fishing in Ordu has economically big impact in the region.

Özet

Kıyısal alanlarda rekreasyonel balıkçılık Türkiye’nin ekonomik gelişiminde önemli bir rol oynamaktadır. Bu çalışmada, Ordu İli’nde rekreasyonel balıkçılığın pazardışı ekonomik değeri Koşullu Değerleme (31,500 Türk Lirası: TL) ve Seyahat Maliyeti (504,000 TL) Yöntemleri kullanılarak hesaplandı. Tobit Regresyon Model ile ödeme istekliliğine etki eden faktörler ve Negatif Binomiyal Regresyon Model ile bireysel seyahat maliyetine etki eden faktörler değerlendirilmiştir. Pazardışı faydaları belirlemenin yanında, rekreasyonel balıkçıların balıkçılık, demografik ve sosyoekonomik özellikleri rekreasyonel balıkçılığın yapısını daha iyi anlamak üzere sorgulanmıştır. Sonuç olarak, Ordu İli’nde rekreasyonel balıkçılığın büyük bir ekonomik etkisi bulunmaktadır

🔖

Cite This Article

AYDIN, M., TUNCA, S., KARADURMUŞ, U., DURGUN, D. (2013). Rekreasyonel balıkçılığın faydalarının değerlemesi: Ordu örneği. Su Ürünleri Dergisi, Cilt: 30 - Sayı: 4, 147–154. https://ajindex.com/articles/311346

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (5)

  1. Anonymous, 2012. No: 3/2 Notification of regulations on marine and inland recreational fisheries in Turkey (in Turkish). Notification Number: 2012/66. Republic of Turkey Ministry of Food, Agriculture and Livestock, Ankara.
  2. Bateman, I., Willis, K.G., 2002. Valuing Environmental Preferences: Theory and Practice of Contingent Valuation Method in the US, EU and Developing Countries. Oxford University Press, USA. ISBN-10: 0199248915, 692 p. Bilgic, A., Florkowski, W.J., 2007. Application of a hurdle negative binomial count data model to demand for bass fishing in the southeastern United States. Journal of Environmental Management, 83: 478-490. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2006.10.009 Cantrell, R.N., Garcia, M., Leung, P., Ziemann, D., 2004. Recreational anglers’ willingness to pay for increased catch rates of Pacific threadfin (Polydactylus sexfilis) in Hawaii. Fisheries Research. 68: 149–158. doi: 10.1016/j.fishres.2004.01.003 Creel, M.D., Loomis, J.B., 1990. Theoretical and empirical advantages of truncated count data estimators for analysis of deer hunting in California. American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 72(2): 434-441. doi: 10.2307/1242345 Demir, N., 2007. Ordu İlinin Eski Adı "kotyora" ve Tarihî Alt Yapısı, Turkish Studies, Volume 2/2. EU, 2004. Mediterranean: guaranteeing sustainable fisheries. Fishing in Europe, 21, 12 pp. FIS, 2011.
  3. Fisheries Information System, Republic of Turkey Ministry of Food, Agriculture and Livestock, General Directorate of Fisheries, Ankara.
  4. Turkey. Gaudin, C., De Young, C., 2007. Recreational fisheries in the Mediterranean countries: a review of existing legal frameworks. Studies and Reviews. General Fisheries Commission for the Mediterranean. No.81. Rome, FAO. 85 pp. Gillig, D., Ozuna, Jr.T., Griffin, W.L., 2000. The Value of the Gulf of Mexico Recreational Red Snapper Fishery. Marine Resource Economics, 15: 127–139. Greene, W.H., 2000.
  5. Econometric Analysis, Prentice Hall, USA, 1004 p. Grogger, J.T., Carson, R.T., 1991. Models for truncated counts. Journal of Applied Econometrics, 6: 225-238. doi: 10.1002/jae.3950060302 Gujarati, N.D., 2004. Basic Econometrics. McGraw-Hill, 4th Edition, USA. 1002 p. Haab, T.C., 2002. Valuing Environmental and Natural Resources, Econometrics of Non-Market Valuation, Edward Elgar Publishing Limited. 352 p. doi: 10.4337/9781843765431 Hickley, P., Tompkins, H., 1998. Recreational Fisheries: Social, Economic and Management Aspects. Wiley-Blackwell, 1st Edition, 328 pp. Loomis, J.B., Rosenberger