Journals / Su Ürünleri Dergisi / 2014 / Cilt: 31 - Sayı: 2

Clasical methods on the seafood freshness and quality determination

Su ürünlerinde tazelik ve kalite belirlemede klasik yöntemler

Pages
105–111
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

In this study, the physical, chemical, microbiological and sensory methods, being used in fressness and quality control of seafood from the past to present have been investigated.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Quality products must be made by complying with the quality products and the highest level of quality resources for health conditions.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Seafood is located in perishable food group.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:In this study, the physical, chemical, microbiological and sensory methods, being used in fressness and quality control of seafood from the past to present have been investigated.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Quality products must be made by complying with the quality products and the highest level of quality resources for health conditions. Seafood is located in perishable food group. Seafood is also used in production of manufactured goods of the food industry as a raw material. For the protection of consumer health, the control of the quality and freshness of raw materials must be provided with appropriate methods before the production process steps. This control process is important to international trade, also. In this study, the physical, chemical, microbiological and sensory methods, being used in fressness and quality control of seafood from the past to present have been investigated.

Özet

Kaliteli ürünlerin kaliteli kaynaktan ve en yüksek düzeyde sağlık koşullarına uyarak üretilmesi gerekir. Su ürünleri kolay bozulur gıdalar grubunda yer alır. Gıda endüstrisinin mamul madde üretiminde hammadde olarak su ürünleri de kullanılmaktadır. Tüketici sağlığının korunması için, üretim işlem basamaklarına geçilmeden uygun yöntemlerle hammaddenin kalite ve tazeliğinin kontrol ve denetimi gerekir. Bu kontrol ve denetim uluslar arası ticaret için de önemlidir. Bu çalışmada su ürünlerinin tazelik ve kalite denetimlerinde geçmişten bugüne kullanılmakta olan fiziksel, kimyasal, mikrobiyolojik ve duyusal yöntemler incelenmiştir.

🔖

Cite This Article

ÇETİNKAYA, S., BİLGİN, Ş., ERTAN, Ö. O. (2014). Clasical methods on the seafood freshness and quality determination. Su Ürünleri Dergisi, Cilt: 31 - Sayı: 2, 105–111. https://ajindex.com/articles/311286

References (7)

  1. Agemura, T., Joy, D. C., 2002. Fish-Eye Optics for the Scanning Electron Microscope. Microsc. Microanal, 8 (02): 716-717
  2. Alasalvar, C., Taylor, K. D. A., Öksüz, A., Gartwaite, T., Alexis, M. N., Grigorakis, K., 2001. Freshness Assessment of Cultured Sea Bream (Sparus auratus) by Chemical, Physical and Sensory Methods. Food Chemistry, 72: 33-40. doi: 10.1016/S0308-8146(00)00196-5
  3. Altuğ, T., Elmacı, Y., 2005. Gıdalarda Duyusal Değerlendirme. Meta Basım Matbacılık Hizmetleri, İzmir. 130 s. Barbosa, A., Vaz-Pires, P. 2004. Quality Index Method (QIM): Development of a Sensorial Scheme for Commmon Octopus Optopus vulgaris). Food Control, 15: 161-168. doi: 10.1016/S0956-7135(03)00027-6
  4. Benedito, J., Carcel, J. A., Rossello, C., Mulet, A., 2001. Composition Assessment of Raw Meat Mixtures Using Ultrasonics. Meat Science, 57(4): 365-370. doi: 10.1016/S0309-1740(00)00113-3
  5. Berkel, B. M., Boogaard, B., Heijnen, C., 2004. Preservation of Fish and Meat Agrodok 12. Agromisa Foundation, Wageningen, the Netherlands. 86 p. Careche, M., Barroso, M., 2009. Instrumental Texture Measurement. In: Quality of Fish From Catch to Consumer, Luten, J. B., Oehlenschlager, J., Olafsdotttir (Eds.), Wageningen Academic Publishers, Netherlands. pp. 214-239.
  6. Coppes, Z., Pavlisko, A., Vecchi, S. 2002. Texture Measurements in Fish and Fish Products. Journal of Aquatic Food Product Technology, 11 (1): 89- 105. doi: 10.1300/J030v11n01_08 Çaklı, Ş. 2007. Su Ürünleri İşleme Teknolojisi. Cilt 1. Ege Üniversitesi Yayınları. No:76. Ege Üniversitesi Basımevi, Bornova, İzmir. 696 s. Gülyavuz, H., Ünlüsayın, M., 1999.
  7. Su Ürünleri İşleme Teknolojisi, Süleyman Demirel Üniversitesi Eğirdir Su Ürünleri Fak. Ders Kitabı, Şahin Matbaası, Ankara. 366 s. Huss, H. H., 1995. Quality and Quality Changes in Fresh Fish. Fao Fisheries Technical Paper- 348, Rome. 172 p. Johnston, W. A., Nicholson, F. J., Roger, A., Stroud, G. D., 1994. Freezing and Refrigerated Storage in Fisheries. FAO Fisheries Technical Paper. No 340, Rome, FAO. 143 p. Jorgensen, B. M., Oehlenschlager, J., Olafsdottir, G., Tryggvadottir, S. V., Careche, M., Heia, K., Nesvadba, P., Nunes, M. L., Poli, B. M., Di Natale, C., Perez-Villareal, B., Ballo, H., Luten, J., Smelt, A, Denton, W., Bossier, P., Hattula, T., Akesson, G., 2003. A study of the attitudes of the European fish sector towards quality monitoring and labelling. In: Quality of Fish From Catch to Consumer, Luten, J. B., Oehlenschlager, J., Olafsdotttir (Eds.), Wageningen Academic Publis