Journals / Doğuş Üniversitesi Dergisi / 2021 / Cilt: 22 - Sayı: 1

INVESTIGATING THE STATIONARY PROPERTIES OF COAL, NATURAL GAS, AND OIL CONSUMPTION: THE CASE OF FRAGILE FIVE COUNTRIES

KÖMÜR, DOĞAL GAZ VE PETROL TÜKETİMİNİN DURAĞANLIK ÖZELLİKLERİNİN İNCELENMESİ: KIRILGAN BEŞLİ ÖRNEĞİ

Pages
75–86
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Finally, it is found that shocks on oil consumption are temporary for only India and Indonesia.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:We examine the stationarity properties of primary energy consumption for "Fragile Five" countries and assesses whether shocks on coal, natural gas, and oil consumption are permanent or temporary.
📊
Key Findings & Data:The findings suggest that shocks on coal consumption are temporary for Brazil, South Africa, and Turkey, while are permanent for India and Indonesia.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Finally, it is found that shocks on oil consumption are temporary for only India and Indonesia.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Birincil Enerji Tüketimi · Fourier Birim Kök Testi · PPrimary Energy Consumption

Abstract

We examine the stationarity properties of primary energy consumption for "Fragile Five" countries and assesses whether shocks on coal, natural gas, and oil consumption are permanent or temporary. The findings suggest that shocks on coal consumption are temporary for Brazil, South Africa, and Turkey, while are permanent for India and Indonesia. Moreover, the effect of shocks on natural gas consumption is temporary for five fragile countries except for South Africa. Finally, it is found that shocks on oil consumption are temporary for only India and Indonesia.

Özet

"Kırılgan Beşli" ülkeleri için birincil enerji tüketiminin birim kök özelliklerini analiz edip ve kömür, doğal gaz ve petrol tüketimi üzerindeki şokların kalıcı veya geçici olup olmadığı incelenmiştir. Bulgular, kömür tüketimi üzerindeki şokların Brezilya, Güney Afrika ve Türkiye için geçici, Hindistan ve Endonezya için kalıcı olduğunu göstermektedir. Ayrıca, şokların doğal gaz tüketimi üzerindeki etkisi Güney Afrika dışındaki beş kırılgan ülke için geçicidir. Son olarak, petrol tüketimindeki şokların sadece Hindistan ve Endonezya için geçici olduğu bulunmuştur

🔖

Cite This Article

AKAY, E. Ç., ÜN, T., BÜLBÜL, H. (2021). INVESTIGATING THE STATIONARY PROPERTIES OF COAL, NATURAL GAS, AND OIL CONSUMPTION: THE CASE OF FRAGILE FIVE COUNTRIES. Doğuş Üniversitesi Dergisi, Cilt: 22 - Sayı: 1, 75–86. https://ajindex.com/articles/309667

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (11)

  1. Abadir, K. M. and Distaso, W. (2007). Testing joint hypotheses when one of the alternatives is one-sided. Journal of Econometrics, 140(2), 695-718.
  2. Abid, M., & Alimi, M. (2019). Stochastic convergence in US disaggregated gas consumption at the sector level. Journal of Natural Gas Science and Engineering, 61, 357-368.
  3. Akram, V., Rath, B. N. and Sahoo, P. K. (2020). Stochastic conditional convergence in per capita energy consumption in India. Economic Analysis and Policy, 65(2020), 224-240.
  4. Apergis, N., Loomis, D. and Payne, J.E. (2010a). Are fluctuations in coal consumption transitory or permanent? Evidence from a panel of US states. Apply Energy, 87(7), 2424–2426.
  5. Apergis, N. Loomis, D. and Payne, J.E. (2010b). Are shocks to natural gas consumption temporary or permanent? evidence from a panel of US states. Energy Policy, 38(8), 4734–4736.
  6. Apergis, N. and Payne, J.E. (2010). Structural breaks and petroleum consumption in US states: are shock transitory or permanent? Energy Policy, 38(10), 6375– 6378. Aslan, A. (2011). Does natural gas consumption follow a nonlinear path over time? evidence from 50 US states. Renewable & Sustainable Energy Reviews, 15(9), 4466–4469.
  7. Aslan, A. and Kum, H. (2011). The stationary of energy consumption for Turkish disaggregate data by employing linear and nonlinear unit root tests. Energy, 36(7), 4256–4258.
  8. Becker. R., Enders, W. and Lee, J. (2006). A stationarity test in the presence of an unknown number of breaks. Journal of Time Series Analysis, 27(3), 381-409.
  9. Brock, W., Dechert, W. D. and Scheinkman, J. (1987). A test for independence based on the correlation dimension. Economics Working Paper, University of Winconsin at Madison, University of Houston, and University of Chicago. Burakov, D. (2019). Are oil shocks permanent or temporary? Panel data evidence from crude oil production in 15 countries. International Journal of Energy Economics and Policy, 9(2), 295. Cai, Y. and Magazzino, C. (2019). Are shocks to natural gas consumption transitory or permanent? a more powerful panel unit root test on the G7 countries. In Natural Resources Forum, Oxford, UK: Blackwell Publishing Ltd., 43(2), 111–120.
  10. Chen, P. F. and Lee, C. C. (2007). Is energy consumption per capita broken stationary? new evidence from regional-based panels. Energy Policy, 35(6), 3526-3540.
  11. Christopoulos, D. K. and Leon-Ledesma, M. A. (2010). Smooth breaks and non-linear mean reversion: post-bretton woods real exchange rates. Journal of International Money and