Journals / Psikiyatri Hemşireliği Dergisi / 2020 / Cilt: 11 - Sayı: 2

Validity and reliability study of the Turkish Version of the Holistic Well-being Scale in individuals with cancer

Pages
141–147
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

The Holistic Well-being Scale can be used in future nursing research and practice as an assessment tool for holistic well-being in patients with cancer.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Objectives: It is thought that determining the level of holistic well-being levels of cancer patients during the treatment process, checking them at regular intervals, determining problem areas, and designing interventions will be important in terms of primary protection in mental health.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Methods: A convenience sample of 230 patients being treated with cancer were asked to complete a questionnaire.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:The Holistic Well-being Scale can be used in future nursing research and practice as an assessment tool for holistic well-being in patients with cancer.
🔬Design:Survey & Empirical Study
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Özet

Objectives: It is thought that determining the level of holistic well-being levels of cancer patients during the treatment process, checking them at regular intervals, determining problem areas, and designing interventions will be important in terms of primary protection in mental health. This study aimed to determine the validity and reliability of the Turkish version of the Holistic Well-being Scale and to study its validity and reliability. Methods: A convenience sample of 230 patients being treated with cancer were asked to complete a questionnaire. The data were evaluated using SPSS 21 (SPSS Inc., Chicago IL, USA) statistical software. The translation was performed using a double forward and backward method. An expert panel evaluated the content validity. Verification of the structure obtained with confirmatory factor analysis was provided by AMOS 24.0. Psychometric testing included internal consistency reliability (Cronbach's alpha coefficient and split-half reliability validity). Results: The Cronbach’s alpha value of the scale was 0.73. The split-half reliability results were quite reliable (Cronbach’s α=0.77). The model was validated by confirmatory factor analysis (χ2/SD=2.41, GFI=0.82, IFI=0.81, CFI=0.81, RMSEA=0.07, and RMR=0.674). Conclusion: The Turkish version of the Holistic Well-being Scale was found to be reliable and valid for Turkish cancer patients after some modifications. The Holistic Well-being Scale can be used in future nursing research and practice as an assessment tool for holistic well-being in patients with cancer.

🔖

Cite This Article

KILIÇ, S. T., ÖZ, F. (2020). Validity and reliability study of the Turkish Version of the Holistic Well-being Scale in individuals with cancer. Psikiyatri Hemşireliği Dergisi, Cilt: 11 - Sayı: 2, 141–147. https://ajindex.com/articles/308393

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (12)

  1. Güllü İ, Zengin N. Kanserle mücadelede ulusal kanser danışma kurulunun rolü. In: Tuncer M, editor. Türkiye’de Kanser Kontrolü. Ankara; T.C. Sağlık Bakanlığı Kanserle Savaş Dairesi Başkanlığı, Koza Matbaacılık; 2009. p. 9
  2. Breitbart WS, Alici Y. Psycho-oncology. Harv Rev Psychiatry 2009;17:361–76
  3. Seven M, Akyüz A, Sever N, Dinçer Ş. Kanser Tanısı Alan Hastaların Yaşadığı Fiziksel ve Psikolojik Semptomların Belirlenmesi. TAF Prev Med Bull 2013;12:219–24
  4. Tsai JS, Wu CH, Chiu TY, Chen CY. Significance of symptom clustering in palliative care of advanced cancer patients. J Pain Symptom Manage 2010;39:655–62
  5. Andersen BL, DeRubeis RJ, Berman BS, Gruman J, Champion VL, Massie MJ, et al; American Society of Clinical Oncology. Screening, assessment, and care of anxiety and depressive symptoms in adults with cancer: an American Society of Clinical Oncology guideline adaptation. J Clin Oncol 2014;32:160519
  6. Puchalski CM, Sbrana A, Ferrell B, Jafari N, King S, Balboni T, et al. Interprofessional spiritual care in oncology: a literature review. ESMO Open. 2019;4:e000465
  7. Jim HS, Pustejovsky JE, Park CL, Danhauer SC, Sherman AC, Fitchett G, et al. Religion, spirituality, and physical health in cancer patients: A meta-analysis. Cancer 2015;121:3760–8
  8. Lee GL, Ramaswamy A. Physical, psychological, social, and spiritual aspects of end-of-life trajectory among patients with advanced cancer: A phenomenological inquiry. Death studies 2018;1–11
  9. Wagland R, Richardson A, Ewings S, Armes J, Lennan E, Hankins M, et al. Prevalence of cancer chemotherapy-related problems, their relation to health-related quality of life and associated supportive care: a cross-sectional survey. Support Care Cancer 2016;24:4901–11
  10. Yamagishi A, Morita T, Miyashita M, Igarashi A, Akiyama M, Akizuki N, et al. Pain intensity, quality of life, quality of palliative care, and satisfaction in outpatients with metastatic or recurrent cancer: a Japanese, nationwide, region-based, multicenter survey. J Pain Symptom Manage 2012;43:503–14
  11. Boonyathee S, Nagaviroj K, Anothaisintawee T. The Accuracy of the Edmonton Symptom Assessment System for the Assessment of Depression in Patients With Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Am J Hosp Palliat Care 2018;35:731–9
  12. Roze des Ordons AL, Sinuff T, Stelfox HT, Kondejewski J, Sinclair S. Spiritual Distress Within Inpatient Settings-A Scoping Review of Patients' and Families' Experiences. J Pain Symptom Manage 2018;56:12