SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Psikiyatri Hemşireliği Dergisi / 2021 / Cilt: 12 - Sayı: 1

Comparison of disability and social functionality levels and subjective recovery perceptions of the patients received and did not receive service from community mental health center

Selda ÖZTÜRK
NİHAN ALTAN SARIKAYA
Sevcan ÖZ
Pages
1–8
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Conclusion: There was no significant difference between disability, social functioning and subjective feeling of recovery of patients who followed up in CMHC and do not followed up in CMHC.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Objectives: This study was aimed to investigate the disability, social functioning and subjective recovery of patients who have been followed up and do not followed up in the Community Mental Health Center (CMHC).
📊
Key Findings & Data:Methods: This cross-sectional and descriptive research was conducted with patients who have been followed up in CMHC (n=19) and do not followed up in CMHC (n=19) in between dates of June-August 2018.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Conclusion: There was no significant difference between disability, social functioning and subjective feeling of recovery of patients who followed up in CMHC and do not followed up in CMHC.
🔬Design:Survey & Empirical Study
📍Scope:2018 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Özet

Objectives: This study was aimed to investigate the disability, social functioning and subjective recovery of patients who have been followed up and do not followed up in the Community Mental Health Center (CMHC). Methods: This cross-sectional and descriptive research was conducted with patients who have been followed up in CMHC (n=19) and do not followed up in CMHC (n=19) in between dates of June-August 2018. Questionnaire form, Social Functioning Assessment Scale (SFAS) and Subjective Recovery Assessment Scale (SubRAS) were used for data collection. Data were analysed by the use of Independent-Samples t test, Chi-Square test and Spearman correlation Analysis. Results: There was no statistical significance between the patients who followed up CMHC and do not followed up CMHC. It was determined that patients who followed up in CMHC had less disability, better functioning and subjective feeling of recovery. It was determined that as age of onset and income increased, the social functioning of the patients also increased (p=0.031, p=0.032, respectively). Significant negative correlation were found between SFAS and WHODAS-II (p=0.045) and positive correlation between SFAS and WHO-DAS-II total score (p=0.020). Significant negative correlations were found between WHO-DAS-II and SubRAS total score (p=0.002). Conclusion: There was no significant difference between disability, social functioning and subjective feeling of recovery of patients who followed up in CMHC and do not followed up in CMHC.

🔖

Cite This Article

ÖZTÜRK, S., SARIKAYA, N. A., ÖZ, S. (2021). Comparison of disability and social functionality levels and subjective recovery perceptions of the patients received and did not receive service from community mental health center. Psikiyatri Hemşireliği Dergisi, Cilt: 12 - Sayı: 1, 1–8. https://ajindex.com/articles/308369

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (12)

  1. Çiçekoğlu P, Duran S. Dünyada ve Türkiye’de toplum temelli koruyucu ruh sağlığı hizmetleri. Ünsal Barlas G, editor. Toplum Ruh Sağlığı Hemşireliği. 1st ed. Ankara: Türkiye Klinikleri; 2018. p. 8–14
  2. Erkoç Y, Çom S, Torunoğlu MA, Alataş G, Kahiloğulları AK. T.C. Sağlık Bakanlığı Ulusal Ruh Sağlığı Eylem Planı (2011-2023). Ankara, T.C. Sağlık Bakanlığı Yayınları. Yayın No: 847:33–4. Available at: https://dosyamerkez.saglik.gov.tr/Eklenti/30333,ulusal-ruh-sagligi-eylem-planipdf.pdf?0. Retrieved May, 2019
  3. Eren HK. Ruh Sağlığına Yönelik Dünya’daki ve Türkiye’deki Mevcut Uygulamalar. Gürhan N, editör. Ruh sağlığı ve psikiyatri hemşireliği. Ankara: Nobel Tıp Kitabevleri; 2016. p. 844– 70
  4. Üstün G, Küçük L, Buzlu S. Bir Toplum Ruh Sağlığı Merkezi’nde uygulanan rehabilitasyon programlarına katılan ve katılmayan şizofreni hastalarının bazı sosyodemografik ve hastalıkla ilişkili özellikleri ile tedaviye uyumları ve öz-yeterlilikleri açısından tanımlanması. J Psychiatric Nurs 2018;9:69–79, 5. Yıldız M. Ciddi ruhsal hastalıklarda ruhsal toplumsal tedaviler. Türkiye Klinikleri Journal of Psychiatry-Special Topics 2009;2:52–6
  5. Ensari H, Gültekin BK, Karaman D, Koç A, Beşkardeş AF. Bolu Toplum Ruh Sağlığı Merkezi hizmetlerinin şizofreni hastalarındaki yaşam kalitesi, yeti yitimi, genel ve sosyal işlevsellik üzerine etkisi: Bir yıllık izleme sonuçları. Anadolu Psikiyatri Derg 2013;14:108–14
  6. Söğütlü L, Özen Ş, Varlık C, Güler A. Toplum ruh sağlığı merkezinde şizofreni hastalarına ruhsal toplumsal beceri eğitimi uygulanması ve sonuçları. Anadolu Psikiyatri Derg 2017;18:121–8
  7. Şahin Ş, Elboğa G. Toplum ruh sağlığı merkezinden yararlanan hastaların yaşam kalitesi, tıbbi tedaviye uyumu, içgörü ve işlevsellikleri. Cukurova Medical Journal 2019;44:431–8
  8. Rossi A, Amore M, Galderisi S, Rocca P, Bertolino A, Aguglia E, et al; Italian Network for Research on Psychoses. The complex relationship between self-reported 'personal recovery' and clinical recovery in schizophrenia. Schizophr Res 2018;192:108–12
  9. Çam O, Yalçıner N. Ruhsal Hastalık ve İyileşme. J Psychiatric Nurs 2018;9:55–60
  10. İpçi K, İncedere A, Kiras F, Yıldız M. Şizofreni hastalarında öznel iyileşme ile bilişsel içgörü arasındaki ilişkinin araştırılması. Kocaeli Üniversitesi Sağlık Bilimleri Dergisi 2018;4:1–4
  11. Drake RE, Whitley R. Recovery and severe mental illness: description and analysis. Can J Psychiatry 2014;59:236-42
  12. Eneman M, Vanhee L, Liessens D, Luyten P, Sabbe B, Corve