SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Retina-Vitreus / 2011 / Cilt: 19 - Sayı: 1

Scleral buckling surgery in pseudophakic rhegmatogenous retinal detachment

Psödofakik regmatojen retina dekolmanı olgularında konvansiyonel skleral çökertme cerrahisi

Selçuk SIZMAZ
İmren AKKOYUN
GÜRSEL YILMAZ
Aydın Yonca AKOVA
Pages
37–41
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Conclusion: Scleral buckling surgery is an effective alternative in pseudophakic retinal detachment and it could be the first choice in selected cases.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Purpose: To evaluate the efficiency of scleral buckling surgery in pseudophakic retinal detachment cases.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Demographic features of the patients, pre and postoperative anterior and posterior segment findings, surgical technique and recurrence rates were evaluated.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Conclusion: Scleral buckling surgery is an effective alternative in pseudophakic retinal detachment and it could be the first choice in selected cases.
🔬Design:Review & Systematic Survey
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Purpose: To evaluate the efficiency of scleral buckling surgery in pseudophakic retinal detachment cases. Materials and Methods: Medical charts of patients who underwent scleral buckling surgery for pseudophakic retinal detachment were retrospectively reviewed. Demographic features of the patients, pre and postoperative anterior and posterior segment findings, surgical technique and recurrence rates were evaluated. Results: Fifty four eyes of 54 patients (14 females, 40 males) were included. All eyes underwent scleral buckling surgery. In 46 (85.2%) eyes retina was completely reattached postoperatively. In 8 (14.8%) eyes that had complicated cataract surgery with posterior capsular rupture and vitreous loss, recurrence of the retinal detachment occurred during follow-up; these eyes underwent pars plana vitrectomy combined with either silicon oil or SF6 gas injection. Finally, in 53 eyes retina was completely reattached. Conclusion: Scleral buckling surgery is an effective alternative in pseudophakic retinal detachment and it could be the first choice in selected cases.

Özet

Amaç: Psödofakik retina dekolmanı olgularında konvansiyonel sklera çökertme cerrahisinin etkinliğinin araştırılması. Gereç ve Yöntem: Psödofakik retina dekolmanı tanısıyla skleral çökertme cerrahisi yapılan, en az 6 ay takibi olan olguların gözü çalışmaya dahil edilirken, dev retina yırtığı, retina diyalizi, evre C2 ve üstü proliferatif vitreoretinopatisi, retinoskizis ve vitreus opasitesi olan gözler çalışmaya dahil edilmedi. Hastaların kayıtları retrospektif olarak tarandı. Olguların demografik özellikleri, ameliyat öncesi ve sonrası ön ve arka segment muayene bulguları, uygulanan cerrahi teknik ve tekrarlama oranları değerlendirildi. Bulgular: Çalışma kapsamında (14 kadın, 40 erkek) 54 hastanın 54 gözü incelendi. Tüm olgulara sklera çökertme cerrahisi uygulandı. Kırk altı (%85.2) gözde retinanın tamamen yatıştığı görüldü. Postoperatif izlemde, komplikasyonlu katarakt ameliyatı öyküsü olan 8 olguda (%14.8) retina dekolmanının tekrarladığı görüldü ve bu olgulara pars plana vitrektomi ile beraber silikon yağı veya SF6 gazı enjeksiyonu uygulandı. Olguların 53’ünde (%98.1) son kontrolde retinanın yatışık olduğu tespit edildi. Sonuç: Psödofakik retina dekolmanı tedavisinde konvansiyonel sklera çökertme cerrahisi etkin bir tedavi seçeneğidir ve uygun olgularda öncelikle uygulanabilir.

🔖

Cite This Article

SIZMAZ, S., AKKOYUN, İ., YILMAZ, G., AKOVA, A. Y. (2011). Scleral buckling surgery in pseudophakic rhegmatogenous retinal detachment. Retina-Vitreus, Cilt: 19 - Sayı: 1, 37–41. https://ajindex.com/articles/307731

References (16)

  1. Halberstadt M, Chatterjee-Sanz N, Brandenber L, et al.: Primary retinal reattachment surgery: anatomical and functional outcome in phacic and pseudophacic eyes. Eye. 2005;19:891-898
  2. Sodhi A, Leung LS, Do DV, et al.: Recent trends in the management of rhegmatogenous retinal detachment. Surv Ophthalmol. 2008;53:50-67
  3. D’Amico DJ.: Primary retinal detachment. N Engl J Med. 2008;359:2346-2354
  4. Schwartz SG, Kuhl DP, McPherson AR, et al.: Twenty-year follow-up for scleral buckling. Arch Ophthalmol. 2002;120:325-329
  5. Schwartz SG, Flyn HW.: Primary retinal detachment: scleral buckle or pars plana vitrectomy? Curr Opin Ophthalmol. 2006;17:245-250
  6. Halberstadt M, Chatterjee-Sanz N, Brandenberg L, et al.: Primary retinal reattechment surgery: anatomical and functional outcome in phakic and pseudophakic eyes. Eye. 2005;19:891-898
  7. Yılmaz G.: Primer retina dekolmanı: Skleral çökertme mi? Primer vitrektomi mi? T. Klin. Oftalmol Özel Sayı. 2009;2:1-4
  8. Ahmadieh H, Moradian S, Faghihi H, et al.: Anatomic and visual outcomes of scleral buckling versus primary vitrectomy in pseudophakic and aphakic retinal detachment. Ophthalmology. 2005;112:1421-1429
  9. Heimann H, Hellmich M, Bornfeld N, et al.: Scleral buckling versus primary vitrectomy in rhegmatogenous retinal detachment (SPR study): Design issues and implications. Graefe’s Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2001;239:567-574
  10. Feltgen N, Weiss C, Wolf S, et al.: Scleral buckling versus primary vitrectomy in rhegmatogenous retinal detachment (SPR study): recruitment list evaluation. Graefe’s Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2007;245:803-809
  11. Çekiç O, Chang S, Schiff WM, et al.: Removal of the intruding Miragel’s scleral buckle by pars plana ultrasonic fragmentation. Am J Ophthalmol. 2005;139:209-210
  12. Kunimoto DY, Kaiser RS.: Incidence of endophthalmitis after 20 and 25-gauge vitrectomy. Ophthalmology. 2007;109:1814-1820
  13. Cohen SM, Flynn HW, Jr Murray TG, et al.: Endophthalmitis after pars plana vitrectomy: The postvitrectomy endophthalmitis study group. Ophthalmology. 1995;101:705-712
  14. Thompson JA, Snead MP, Billington BM, et al.: National audit of the outcome of primary surgery for rhegmatogenous retinal detachment. II. Clinical outcomes. Eye. 2002;16:771-777
  15. Abdullah AS, Jan S, Qureshi MS, et al.: Complications of conventional scleral buckling occuring during and after treatment of rhegmatogenous retinal detachment. J Coll Physicians Surg Pak. 2010;20:321-326
  16. Han DP, Mohsin NC, Gu