Journals / Retina-Vitreus / 2012 / Cilt: 20 - Sayı: 1

Intravitreal bevacizumab for diabetic macular edema

Diabetik maküla ödeminde intravitreal bevacizumab etkinliğininin değerlendirilmesi

Pages
35–40
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Conclusion: There was significant difference between the mean IOPs after second and third injections.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Purpose: To evaluate the effects of intravitreal bevacizumab administration on visual acuity (VA), intraocular pressure (IOP) and central foveal thickness (CFT) in patients with diabetic macular edema.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Materials and Methods: İntravitreal bevacizumab injection was applied to 39 eyes of 35 patients that presented our clinic with diabetic macular edema, between December 2007 and December 2009.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Conclusion: There was significant difference between the mean IOPs after second and third injections.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:2007 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Purpose: To evaluate the effects of intravitreal bevacizumab administration on visual acuity (VA), intraocular pressure (IOP) and central foveal thickness (CFT) in patients with diabetic macular edema. Materials and Methods: İntravitreal bevacizumab injection was applied to 39 eyes of 35 patients that presented our clinic with diabetic macular edema, between December 2007 and December 2009. Before and 1 month after injection of 1,25 mg/ml bevacizumab VA,IOP and CFT was measured for each patient. On the second month,the second injection was applied to 29 eyes, and on the third month the third injection was applied to 12 eyes with persistent macular edema. Results: The mean VA increased from 0.206±0.17 to 0.294±22.1 month after first injection (p<0.05). The mean VA was 0.285±0.23 and 0.417±0.31 after second and third injections, respectively. The difference was statistically significant. The mean CMT was reduced from 464.5±115.35 to 332.11±127.60, 1 month after first injection (p<0.05). The mean CMT was 402.50±124.00 and 370.0±142.31 after second and third injections, respectively. The mean IOP was 13.11±2.80 mmHg before first injection, was 13.31±3.22, 13.72±3.04,14.27±2.72 mmHg after first, second and third injections respectively. Conclusion: There was significant difference between the mean IOPs after second and third injections.

Özet

Amaç: Bu çalışmada diabetik maküla ödeminde intravitreal bevacizumab uygulamasının, görme keskinliği (GK), göz içi basıncı (GİB) ve santral fovea kalınlığına (SFK) olan etkileri araştırıldı. Gereç ve Yöntem: Kliniğimizde Aralık 2007-Aralık 2009 tarihleri arasında 35 hastanın 39 gözüne intravitreal bevacizumab enjeksiyonu uygulandı. Olgulara enjeksiyon öncesi GK, GİB, SFK bakıldı ve 1.25 mg/0.1 ml bevacizumab enjeksiyonu uygulandı. Enjeksiyon sonrası birinci ayda GİB, GK, SFK bakıldı. Anlamlı maküla ödemi (MÖ) devam eden 29 olguya 2. enjeksiyon yapıldı ve maküla ödemi devam eden 12 göze 3. enjeksiyon uygulandı. Olguların GİB, GK, SFK değerlendirildi. Bulgular: Olguların enjeksiyon öncesi (EÖ) görme keskinliği ortalama 0.206±0.17 idi ve enjeksiyon sonrası birinci aydaki ortalama GK 0.294±0.22 idi ve istatiksel olarak anlamlı artış izlendi (p<0.05). 2. ve 3. intravitreal enjeksiyonu sonrası ortalama GK sırasıyla 0.285±0.23, 0.417±0.31 olarak saptandı. İkinci enjeksiyon ile 3. Enjeksiyon sonrası GK arasında istatistiksel olarak anlamlı fark bulundu (p<0.05). EÖ SFK ortalama 464.5±115.35 idi ve enjeksiyon sonrası SFK ortalaması 332.11±127.60 idi ve istatiksel olarak anlamlı düşüş izlendi (p<0.05). 2. ve 3. intravitreal enjeksiyonu sonrası ortalama SFK sırasıyla 402.50±124.00, 370.0±142.31 olarak saptandı. EÖ GİB 13.11±2.80 mmHg ve Enjeksiyon sonrası GİB 13.31±3.22 mmHg idi 2. Enjeksiyon sonrası 13.72±3.04 mmHg, 3. Enjeksiyon sonrası 14.27±2.72 mmHg olarak saptandı. 2. enjeksiyon sonrası GİB ile 3. Enjeksiyon sonrası GİB arasında istatistiksel olarak anlamlı fark bulundu (p<0.05). Sonuç: Diabetik maküla ödeminin tedavisinde intravitreal bevacizumab enjeksiyonunun görme keskinliğini arttırdığı ve fovea kalınlığını azalttığı görüldü. Ancak tekrarlayan enjeksiyonlara ihtiyaç olduğu görüldü.

🔖

Cite This Article

ALAKUŞ, M. F. (2012). Intravitreal bevacizumab for diabetic macular edema. Retina-Vitreus, Cilt: 20 - Sayı: 1, 35–40. https://ajindex.com/articles/307706

References (15)

  1. Davidson J K. Clinical Diabetes Mellitus, Diabetic Eye Disease. Thime Medica Publishers 1991:427-44
  2. Hikichi T, Fujio N, Akiba Y, et al. Association between the short-term natural history of diabetic macular edema and the vitreomacular relationship. Ophthalmology 1997;104:473-8
  3. Klein R, Klein BE, Moss SE. Visual impairment in diabetes. Ophthalmology 1984;91:1-9
  4. Avery RL, Pearlman J, Pieramici DJ, et al. Intravitreal bevacizumab (Avastin) in the treatment of proliferative diabetic retinopathy. Ophthalmology 2006;113:1695
  5. Haritoglou C, Kook D, Neubauer A, et al. Intravitreal Bevacizumab (Avastin) therapy for pesistent diffuse diabetic macular edema. Retina 2006;26:999-1005
  6. Klein R, Moss S. A Comparison of the study populations in the diabetes control and complications trial and the wisconsin epidemiologic study of diabetic retinopathy. Arch Intern Med 1995;10:745-54
  7. Bresnick GH. Diabetic maculopathy: a critical review highlighting diffuse macular edema. Ophthalmology 1983;90:1301-17
  8. Lee CM, Olk RJ. Modified grid laser photocoagulation for diffuse diabetic macular edema: long-term visual results. Ophthalmology 1991;98:1594-602
  9. Qaum T, Xu Q,Joussen AM, et al. VEGF-initiated blood-retinal barrier breakdown in early diabetes. Invest Ophtalmol Vis Sci 2001;42:2408-13
  10. H Funatsu, H Yamashita, K Sakata, et al. Vitreus Levels of Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor and Intercellular Adhesion Molecule 1 Are Releated to Diabetic Macular Edema. Ophtalmology 2005;112:806-16
  11. Adamis AP, Shima DT. The role of vascular endothelial growth factor in ocular health and disease. Retina 2005;25:111-8
  12. Nouck M, Karakiulakis G, Perruchoud AP, et al. Corticosteroids inhibit the expression of the vascular endothelial growth factor gene in human vascular smooth muscle cells. Eur J Pharmacfol 1998;341:309-15 13. Paccola L,Costa RA, Folgosa MS, et al. Intravitreal triamcinolone versus bevacizumab for treatment of refractory diabetic macular oedema (IBEME study). Br J Ophtalmol 2008;92:76-80
  13. Shimura M, Nakazawa T, Yasuda K, et al. Comparative therapy evaluation of intravitreal bevacizumab and triamcinolone acetonide on persistent diffuse diabetic macular edema. Am J Ophtalmol 2008;145:854-61
  14. Lam DS, Lai TY, Lee VY, et al. Efficacy of 1.25 mg versus 2.5 mg intravitreal bevacizumab for diabetic macular edema: six months results of a randomized controlled trial. Retina 2009;29:292-99
  15. Kumar A, Sinha S. Intravitreal bevacizumab (Avas