Journals / Politeknik Dergisi / 2016 / Cilt: 19 - Sayı: 3

BB-BC, PSO and IMO Algorithms for Economic Dispatch Problem of Wind-Thermal Power Plants

Rüzgar ve Termik Santrallerden Oluşan Enerji Sistemlerinde Ekonomik Güç Dağılımının Big-Bang Big-Crunch, PSO ve IMO Algoritmaları ile İrdelenmesi

Pages
261–268
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

The results of the comparison demonstrated that BB-BC algorithm and PSO algorithm were more effective than IMO algorithm.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:In this study, for examining the effect of wind power systems on energy systems, three new heuristic methods were compared to solve economic dispach problem of wind-thermal (hybrid) plants.
📊
Key Findings & Data:These three heuristic algorithms are Big-Bang Big-Crunch (BBBC), Particle Swarm Optimization (PSO) that is generally used in optimization area and Ions Motion Optimization (IMO) which is newly developed.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:The results of the comparison demonstrated that BB-BC algorithm and PSO algorithm were more effective than IMO algorithm.
🔬Design:Modeling & Simulation
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

In this study, for examining the effect of wind power systems on energy systems, three new heuristic methods were compared to solve economic dispach problem of wind-thermal (hybrid) plants. These three heuristic algorithms are Big-Bang Big-Crunch (BBBC), Particle Swarm Optimization (PSO) that is generally used in optimization area and Ions Motion Optimization (IMO) which is newly developed. The objective function (the cost function) was solved to have minimum value in minimum time interval which can be affective on electricity system operator. The results were evaluated with different aspects (i.e. run-time, best value) avaible in the literature. The results of the comparison demonstrated that BB-BC algorithm and PSO algorithm were more effective than IMO algorithm.

Özet

Bu çalışmada, rüzgar santrallerinin enerji sisteminde artan etkilerini irdeleyebilmek için, rüzgar ve termik santrallerinden oluşan hibrit sistemin ekonomik güç dağılım problemi, üç güncel sezgisel algoritma kullanarak incelenmektedir. Optimizasyon çalışmalarında kullanımı yaygın olan Parçacık Sürü Optimizasyonu (Particle Swarm Optimization, PSO) ve Big-Bang BigCrunch (BB-BC) algoritmalarının yanında, literatüre yeni olarak sunulan İyon Hareket Optimizasyonu (Ions Motion Optimization, IMO) algoritması da kullanılarak en iyi ekonomik güç dağılımının belirlenmesi amaçlanmaktadır. Algoritmalarda kullanılan amaç fonksiyonunun minimize edilmesinin yanında, bu algoritmaların bilgisayarda harcadığı süreler de belirlenerek, enerji tesisi işletmecisinin süre yönünden de etkileneceği durumun ortaya konulması hedeflenmektedir. Çalışma sonuçları dikkate alındığında, BB-BC ve PSO algoritmalarının, IMO algoritmasına göre daha hızlı ve etkili olduğu anlaşılmaktadır.

🔖

Cite This Article

KARADENİZ, A., EKER, M. K. (2016). BB-BC, PSO and IMO Algorithms for Economic Dispatch Problem of Wind-Thermal Power Plants. Politeknik Dergisi, Cilt: 19 - Sayı: 3, 261–268. https://ajindex.com/articles/307528

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (17)

  1. Xia X., Eliaw A.M. “Optimal Dynamic Economic Dispatch of Generation: A Review”, Electric Power System Research, 80: 975–986, (2010
  2. Gaing Z.L. “Particle swarm optimization to solving the economic dispatch considering the generator constraints”, IEEE Transactions on Power Systems, 18: 1187–1195, (2003
  3. Tran C.D., Dao T.T., Vo V.S., Nguyen T.T. “Economic Load Dispatch with Multiple Fuel Options and Valve Point Effect Using Cuckoo Search Algorithm with Different Distributions”, International Journal of Hybrid Information Technology, 8: 305–316, (2015
  4. Chen C.-L. “Optimal Wind-Thermal Generating Unit Commitment”, IEEE Transactions on Energy Conversion, 23: 273–280, (2008
  5. Patel M. “Wind and Solar Power Systems”, CRC PRESS, New York, (1999
  6. Özgönenel O., Thomas D.W.P., “Short-term Wind Speed Estimation on Weather Data”, Turk J Elec Eng & Comp Sci, 20, 3:335-346, (2012
  7. Arslan T., Bulut Y.M., Yavuz A.A., “Comperative study of numerical methods for determining Weibull parameters for wind energy potential”, Renewable and Sustinable Energy Reviews, 40: 820-825, (2014)
  8. Mert İ., Karakuş C., A., “Statistical Analysis of Wind Speed Data Using Burr, Generalized Gamma, and Weibull Distributions in Antakya, Turkey”, Turk J Elec Eng & Comp Sci, 23: 1571-1586, (2015)
  9. Elektrik Piyasası Dengeleme ve Uzlaştırma Yönetmeliği, http://www.resmigazete.gov.tr/eskiler/2015/03/2015032 8-7.htm, Erişim Tarihi: 13.11.2015
  10. Hetzer J., Yu D.C., Bhattarai K. “An Economic Dispatch Model Incorporating Wind Power”, IEEE Transactions on Energy Conversion, 23: 603–611, (2008
  11. YANG X.-S. “Nature-inspired metaheuristic algorithms”, Luniver Press, Frome, UK, (2010
  12. Peng C., Sun H., Guo J., Liu G. “Dynamic economic dispatch for wind-thermal power system using a novel bi-population chaotic differential evolution algorithm”, International Journal of Electrical Power & Energy Systems, 42: 119–126, (2012
  13. Saadat H. “Power System Analysis”, PSA Pub., New York, (2010
  14. Victoire T.A.A., Jeyakumar a. E. “Reserve constrained dynamic dispatch of units with valve-point effects”, IEEE Transactions on Power Systems, 20: 1273–1282, (2005
  15. Abuella M. “Particle Swarm for Optimal Power Flow Including Wind-Power”, LAP LAMBERT Pub., Germany, (2012
  16. Erol O.K., Eksin I. “A new optimization method: Big Bang-Big Crunch”, Advances in Engineering Software, 37: 106–111, (2006
  17. Tabrizian Z., Afshari E., Amiri G.G., Ali Beigy M.H., Nejad S.M.P. “A ne