Journals / Atatürk Üniversitesi Diş Hekimliği Fakültesi Dergisi / 2006 / Cilt: 16 - Sayı: 2

Prevalence of congenitally missing permanent teeth in Blacksea region children

Karadeniz bölgesi çocuklarında konjenital daimi diş eksikliği prevalansı

Pages
37–40
Publication Date
2022-10-10
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

As a conclusion the determination of congenitally missing permanent tooth in early period is important in terms of implementation of alternative treatment methods.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:The purpose of this study was to assess the prevalence and distribution of congenitally missing permanent teeth, excluding the third molars in Blacksea region children.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Panoramic radiographs of 981 children (493 girls and 488 boys) between the ages of 6 and 12 years were examined in terms of congenitally missing permanent teeth.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:As a conclusion the determination of congenitally missing permanent tooth in early period is important in terms of implementation of alternative treatment methods.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to assess the prevalence and distribution of congenitally missing permanent teeth, excluding the third molars in Blacksea region children. Panoramic radiographs of 981 children (493 girls and 488 boys) between the ages of 6 and 12 years were examined in terms of congenitally missing permanent teeth. The data were statistically evaluated by Chi-Square ve t-test. The prevalence of congenitally missing permanent teeth was 8.5% (7.7% for boys, 9.5% for girls) with no statistically significant difference between the sexes. The most commonly missing teeth were the mandibular second premolars, followed by the maxillary lateral incisors, and the maxillary second premolars. Symmetrical hypodontia was predominant, and the most commonly symmetrical hypodontia was mandibular second premolar agenesis. Congenitally missing permanent teeth was observed more than mandibula to maxilla but there were no statistically significant difference between the jaws. The distribution of missing teeth was similar between the right and the left sides of the dental arches in each group of children. As a conclusion the determination of congenitally missing permanent tooth in early period is important in terms of implementation of alternative treatment methods.

Özet

Bu çalışmanın amacı; Karadeniz bölgesi çocuklarında, üçüncü büyük azı dişleri dışındaki, daimi dişlerin konjenital olarak eksikliğinin prevalansını ve dağılımını belirlemektir. Bu amaçla, 6-12 yaşlar arasındaki 981 çocuk hastanın (488 erkek, 493 kız) panoramik radyografları konjenital daimi diş eksikliği açısından değerlendirildi. Elde edilen veriler istatistiksel olarak Chi-Square ve t-testi ile değerlendirildi. Araştırmada konjenital daimi diş eksikliği prevalansı % 8,5 olarak bulundu (kızlarda %9,5 ve erkeklerde %7,7) ve cinsiyete göre istatistiksel fark gözlenmedi. En sık eksikliği gözlenen dişler sırası ile; alt ikinci küçük azı, üst yan kesici ve üst ikinci küçük azı olarak tespit edildi. Diş eksikliğinin sıklıkla simetrik olarak izlendiği, en sık simetrik diş eksikliğinin ise, alt ikinci küçük azı dişlerinde meydana geldiği belirlendi. Konjenital daimi diş eksikliği alt çenede üst çeneye göre daha fazla gözlenmesine rağmen, istatistiksel fark bulunamadı. Her iki grupta da sağ ve sol çene/erdeki eksik diş dağılımları ise benzer bulundu. Sonuç olarak çocuklardaki diş eksikliği prevalansının erken dönemde belirlenmesi alternatif tedavi yaklaşımları açısından önemlidir.

🔖

Cite This Article

TUNÇ, Ş. E., KOYUTÜRK, A. E. (2022). Prevalence of congenitally missing permanent teeth in Blacksea region children. Atatürk Üniversitesi Diş Hekimliği Fakültesi Dergisi, Cilt: 16 - Sayı: 2, 37–40. https://ajindex.com/articles/452761

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (12)

  1. Mckibben DR, Brearley LJ. Radiographic determination of the prevalence of selected dental anomalies in children. J Dent Child 1971;38:390-8. Locht S. Panoramic radiographic examination of 704 Danish children aged 9-10 years. Community Dent Oral Epidemiol 1980;8:375-80.
  2. Buenviaje TM, Rapp R. Dental anomalies in children: a clinical and radiographic survey. J Dent Child 1984;51:42-6.
  3. Pilo R, Kaffe I, Amir E, Sarnat H. Diagnosis of develepmental dental anomalies using panoromic radiographs. J Dent Child 1987;54:267-72
  4. Uzamış M, Taner TU, Kansu Ö, Alpar R. Evaluation of dental anomalies in 6-13 year old turkish children: a panoramic survey. J Marmara Un Dent Fac 2001;4:254-9.
  5. Sümer P, Akça T, Köprülü H. Çocuklarda görülen dental anomaliler: Panoromik radyografik değerlendirme. Ondokuz Mayıs Un iv Diş Hekim Fak Derg 2004;5:81-4.
  6. Muller TP, Hill IN, Petersen AC, Blayney JR. A survey of congenitally missing permanent teeth. J Am Dent Assoc 1970;81:101-7.
  7. Endo T, Ozoe R, Kubota M, Akiyama M, Shimooka S. A survey ofhypodontia in Japanese orthodontic patients. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2006; 129:29-35. Sılva Meza R. Radiographic assessment of congenitally missing teeth in orthodontic patients. Int J Paed Dent 2003; 13:112-6. Davis PJ. Hypodontia and hyperdontia of permanent teeth in Hong Kong schoolchildren. Community Dent Oral Epidemiol 1987; 15:218-20. Lynham A. Panoromic radiographic survey of hypodontia in Australian Defence Force recruits. Aus Dent J 1989;35:19-22.
  8. Maklin M, Dummett CO, Weinberg R. A study of oligodontia in a sample of New Orleans children. J Dent Child 1979;46:478-82.
  9. Mahaney MC, Fujiwara TM, Morgan K. Dental agenesis in the Dariusleut Hutterite Brethren: comparisons to selected Caucasoid population surveys. Am J Phys Anthropol 1990;82:165-77.
  10. Kindelan JD, Rysiecki G, Childs WP. Hypodontia: genotype or environment? A case report of monozygotic twins. Br J Orthod 1998;25:175-8. Sperber GH. Anodontia: Two cases of different etiology. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol 1963; 16:73-82.
  11. Arte S, Nieminen P, Pirinen S, Thesleff I, Peltonen L Gene defect in hypodontia: exclusion of EGF, EGFR and FGF-3 as candidate genes. J Dent Res 1996;75:1346-52.
  12. Goldenberg M, Das P, Messersmith M, Stockton DW, Patel PI, D'Souza RN. Clinical, radiographic and genetic evaluation of novel form of autosomal-dominant oligodontia. J Dent Res 2000;79:1469-75. Nunn JH,, Carter NE, Gillgrass TJ, Hobson RS, Jepson NJ, Meechan JG, Nohl FS. The interdisciplinary management o