Journals / Romatizma Dergisi / 2000 / Cilt: 15 - Sayı: 2

Sakroiliitisin erken tanısında görüntüleme yöntemlerinin karşılaştırılması

Comparison of imaging techniques in the early diagnosis of sacroiliitis

Pages
99–104
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

We concluded that MR imaging provide the best objective and complementary evidence of sacroiliitis in patients with clinical features of inflammatory spinal disease.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Sacroiliitis is usually the first and main feature of seronegative spondyloarthropathies.
📊
Key Findings & Data:In our study MRI was performed in 48 patients with clinical evidence of sacroiliitis.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:We concluded that MR imaging provide the best objective and complementary evidence of sacroiliitis in patients with clinical features of inflammatory spinal disease.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Sakroiliyak eklem · Tomografi · x-ışınlı bilgisayarlı

Abstract

Sacroiliitis is usually the first and main feature of seronegative spondyloarthropathies. But the sacroiliac joints present a problem to the diagnostician because of their deep seated location and lack of motion. This forces us to rely heavily on imaging modalities to diagnose diseases of this joint. Therefore, many imaging techniques such as computed tomography (CT); single photon emission computed tomography (SPECT) bone scanning, and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) have been studied. In our study MRI was performed in 48 patients with clinical evidence of sacroiliitis. MRI findings were compared with those at CT and SPECT. Of these patients 35 had abnormal CT scans (73%), 36 had abnormal SPECT scans (75%), and 44 had abnormal MRI scans(91,6%). We concluded that MR imaging provide the best objective and complementary evidence of sacroiliitis in patients with clinical features of inflammatory spinal disease.

Özet

Seronegatif spondiloartropatilerin başlıca ilk görüntüsü genellikle sakroiliitistir. Fakat sakroiliak eklemlerin derin lokalizasyonları ve az hareketli oluşları, tanı açısından bir problem oluşmasına neden olmaktadır. Bu zorluklar, bu eklem hastalıklarının tanısı için görüntüleme teknikleri üzerinde yoğunlaşılmasına neden olmuştur. Bu nedenle bilgisayarlı tomografi(BT), tek foton bilgisayarlı tomografi (SPECT) ve manyetik rezonans görüntüleme(MRG) gibi çeşitli görüntüleme teknikleri üzerinde çalışılmıştır. Bizim çalışmamızda, sakroiliitisin klinik bulgularına sahip 48 hastada MRG çekildi. MRG bulguları, BT ve SPECT sonuçlarıyla karşılaştırıldı. Bu hastaların 35(%73)'inde anormal BT, 36(%75)'sında anormal SPECT ve 44(%91,6)'ünde anormal MRG görüntüleri mevcuttu. MR görüntüleme yönteminin, inflamatuvar spinal hastalığın klinik bulguları olan hastalarda, sakroiliitisin tanısında en objektif ve tanımlayıcı kanıtlar sağladığı sonucuna vardık.

🔖

Cite This Article

ÇEVİK, R., NAS, K., GÜR, A., ÖZATEŞ, M., ATAOĞLU, S., ERDOĞAN, F., SARAÇ, A. J., SATICI, Ö. (2000). Sakroiliitisin erken tanısında görüntüleme yöntemlerinin karşılaştırılması. Romatizma Dergisi, Cilt: 15 - Sayı: 2, 99–104. https://ajindex.com/articles/306088

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (16)

  1. Resnick D, Niwayama G. Diagnosis of bone and joint disorders. 2nd ed. Philadelphia: Saunders, 1988; 695-696: 932-953
  2. Ryan L, Carrera G, Lightfoot RW, et al. The radiographic diagnosis of sacroiliitis: a comparison of different views with computed tomograms of the sacroiliac (SI) joint. Arthritis Rheum 1983; 26:760-763
  3. Dihlman W. Diagnostic radiology of the SI joints. Chicago: Year Book Medical, 1980; 1-26
  4. Lawson TL, Foley WD.Carrera GF, Berland LL. The SI joints: anatomic, plain roentgenographic, and computed tomographic analysis. J Comput Assist Tomogr 1982; 6: 307-314
  5. Hanly JG, Mitchell MJ, Barnes DC, Macmillan L. Early recognition of sacroiliitis by magnetic resonans imaging and single photon emission computed tomography. J Rheumatol. 1994; 21:11
  6. Murphey MD, Wetzel LH, Bramble JM, et al. Sacroiliitis: MR imaging findings. Radiology 1991; 180: 239-44
  7. The HSG, Steven MM, van der Linden SM, Cats A: Evaluation of diagnostic criteria for ankylosing spondylitis: A comparison of the Rome. New York and modified New York criteria in patiens with a positive clinical history screening test for ankylosing spondylitis. Br J Rheumatol. 1985; 24: 242-9
  8. Bellamy N, Park W, Rooney PJ: What do you know about the SI joint? Semin Arhritis Rheum 1983; 12: 282- 310
  9. Mau W, Zeidler H, Mau R, et al: Clinical features and prognosis of patients with possible ankylosing spondylitis. Resuls of a 10-year followup. J Rheumatol 1988: 15: 1109-14
  10. Fam AG, Rubenstein JD, Chin-Sang H, Leung FYK: Computed tomography in the diagnosis of early ankylosing spondylitis. Arhritis Rheum 1985: 28:930-7
  11. Carrera GF, Foley WD, Kozin F, Ryan L, Lawson TL. CT of sacroiliitis. AJR 1981; 136: 41-6
  12. Hanly JG, Barnes DC, Mitchell MJ, et al.: Single photon emission computed tomography (SPECT) in diagnosis of inflammatory spondyloarthropathies. J Rheumatol 1992; 20: 2862-8
  13. Docherty P, Mitchell MJ, MacMillan L, et al. JG. Magnetic resonans imaging in the detection of sacroiliitis. J Rheumatol 1992; 19: 393-401
  14. AhlstrSm H, Feltelius N, Nyman R, Hallgren R: Magnetic resonans imaging of sacroiliac joint inflamation. Arhritis Rheum 1990; 33:1763-9
  15. Battafarano DF, West SG, Rak KM, et al. Comparison of bone scan, computed tomography and magnetic resonans imaging in diagnosis of active sacroiliitis. Semin Arthritis Rheum 1993; 23:161-76
  16. Calin A, Porta J, Fries JF, Schurman DJ; CLinical history as a screening test for ankylosing spondylitis. JAMA 1