SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Romatizma Dergisi / 2001 / Cilt: 16 - Sayı: 2

Kinematic gait analysis in hemiplegic patients

Hemiplejik hastaların kinematik yürüme analizi

ŞENAY ÖZDOLAP ÇOBAN
Aynur KARAGÖZ
Ayşe KARAMERCAN
Neşe ÖZGİRGİN
Pages
95–101
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

The age of patients, sex, hemiplegic side, aetiology and disease duration were not related to these parameters but lower extremity motor status, functional ambulation category, type of ambulation aid and orthosis were related significantly to TD variables.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:In this study, kinematic gait analysis was performed in 46 (22 male, 24 female) hemiplegic patients.
📊
Key Findings & Data:We investigated the effects of clinical characteristics, lower extremity motor status, functional ambulation category, type of ambulation aid and orthosis on temporal-distance (TD) variables.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:The age of patients, sex, hemiplegic side, aetiology and disease duration were not related to these parameters but lower extremity motor status, functional ambulation category, type of ambulation aid and orthosis were related significantly to TD variables.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Biyomekanik · Yürüyüş şekli · Hemipleji

Abstract

In this study, kinematic gait analysis was performed in 46 (22 male, 24 female) hemiplegic patients. We investigated the effects of clinical characteristics, lower extremity motor status, functional ambulation category, type of ambulation aid and orthosis on temporal-distance (TD) variables. The age of patients, sex, hemiplegic side, aetiology and disease duration were not related to these parameters but lower extremity motor status, functional ambulation category, type of ambulation aid and orthosis were related significantly to TD variables.

Özet

Bu çalışmada 46 (22 erkek, 24 kadın) hemiplejik hastada kinematik yürüme analizi yapıldı. Klinik özellikler, alt ekstremite motor durum, fonksiyonel ambulasyon kategorisi ile ortez ve yürümeye yardımcı destek kullanımının zaman-uzaklık değişkenlerine etkisi araştırıldı. Yaş, cinsiyet, hemiplejik taraf, hastalık etiyolojisi ve süresinin zaman-uzaklık değişkenlerini etkilemediği fakat alt ekstremite motor durum ve fonksiyonel ambulasyon kategorisi, ortez ve yürümeye yardımcı destek kullanımının bu değişkenler üzerinde anlamlı derecede etkili olduğu tespit edildi.

🔖

Cite This Article

ÇOBAN, Ş. Ö., KARAGÖZ, A., KARAMERCAN, A., ÖZGİRGİN, N. (2001). Kinematic gait analysis in hemiplegic patients. Romatizma Dergisi, Cilt: 16 - Sayı: 2, 95–101. https://ajindex.com/articles/306038

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (1)

  1. sessment of hemiplegic patient.Am J Phys Med 1987; 66(2): 77-90. 8. Wall J, Turnbull G. Gait asymmetries in residual hemiplegia. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 1986; 67: 550-53. 9. Keith DH, Patricia AG, Patricia AB, et al. Retest reliability of the temporal and distance characteristics of hemiplegic gait using a footswitch system.Arch Phys Med Rehabil 1994; 75: 577-83. 10. Brunnstrom S. Movement Therapy in hemiplegia. A neuromusculer approch. NewYork, Harper and Rowan,1970. 11. Holden MK, Gill KM, Maggliozzi MR.Gait assessment for neurologically impaired patient. Phys Ther 1986; 66: 1530-39. 12. Roth E, Merbitz C. Hemiplegic gait. Relationship between walking speed and other temporal parameters. Am J Phys Med and Reh 1997; 76: 128-133. 13. Bradstater M, Debruin H, Gowland C, et al. Hemiplegic gait: Analysis of temporal variable. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 1983; 64: 583-87. 14. Wade D,Wood V, Heller A. Walking after stroke. Scand J Rehabil Med 1987; 19:25-30. 15. Murray M, Kory R, Sepic S. Walking patterns of normal women. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 1970; 51: 637-50. 16. Finley F, Cody K. Finize. Locomotive patterns in elderly woman. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 1969; 50: 140-46. 17. Murray M, Drought A, Kory R, et al. Walking patterns in normal men. J Bone Joint Surg (AM) 1964; 46: 335-60. 18. Finley FR, Cody K. Locomotive characteristics of urban pedestrians. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 1970; 51: 423-26. 19. Özgirgin N, Bölükbafl N, Beyazova M, et al. Kinematic gait analysis in hemiplegic patient. Scand J Reh Med 1993; 25: 51-53. 20. Knutson E, Richard C. Different types of disturbed motor control in gait of hemiparetic patient. Brain 1979; 102: 405-30. 21. Norton BJ, Bomze HA, Sahrmann SA, et al. Correlation between gait speed and spasticity at the knee. Phys Ther 1975; 55: 355-59. 22. Ely D, Smitd G. Effect of cane on variable of gait for patient with hip disorders. Phys Ther 1977; 57: 507-12. 23. Smidt GL, Mommens MA. System of reporting and comparing influence of ambulatory aids on gait. Phys Ther 1980; 60: 551-58. 24. Corcoran PJ, Brengelman GL. Oxygen uptake in normal and handicapped subject, in relationship to speed of walking beside velocitcontrolled card. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 1970; 51: 78-87. 25. Lehman JF, Ko MS, Dedateur BJ. Knee moments: Origin in normal ambulation and their modifications by doublestopped ankle-foot orthoses. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 1982; 63: 345-51.