Journals / Eskişehir Osmangazi Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Dergisi / 2017 / Cilt: 12 - Sayı: 1

An Analysis of Financial Conditions for Turkey: Evidences from Factor and VAR models

Türkiye İçin Finansal Koşulların Bir Analizi: Faktör ve VAR Modellerinden Bulgular

Pages
99–120
Publication Date
2017-04-01
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

The results suggest that the FCI obtained from the homoscedastic FAVAR model provides the best out-of-sample forecasts, hence it is suggested as a leading indicator of economic activity.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:This paper aims to calculate alternative financial conditions indexes (FCIs) and evaluate the forecasting performance of them for Turkey covering the period 1992:1 and 2015:12.
📊
Key Findings & Data:In the second part of the study the performance of the alternative FCIs are assessed in terms their in-sample and out-of-sample forecasting ability to industrial production gap.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:The results suggest that the FCI obtained from the homoscedastic FAVAR model provides the best out-of-sample forecasts, hence it is suggested as a leading indicator of economic activity.
🔬Design:Modeling & Simulation
📍Scope:2015 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Finansal Koşullar Endeksi · VAR · Dinamik Faktör Modeli

Abstract

This paper aims to calculate alternative financial conditions indexes (FCIs) and evaluate the forecasting performance of them for Turkey covering the period 1992:1 and 2015:12. For this purpose, first financial conditions indexes are constructed based on four methodologies: Reduced form demand functions, VAR generalized impulse-response functions, dynamic factor model and factor-augmented VAR models (FAVARs). In the second part of the study the performance of the alternative FCIs are assessed in terms their in-sample and out-of-sample forecasting ability to industrial production gap. The results suggest that the FCI obtained from the homoscedastic FAVAR model provides the best out-of-sample forecasts, hence it is suggested as a leading indicator of economic activity.

Özet

Bu çalışma 1992:1 ve 2015:12 dönemini kapsayacak şekilde Türkiye için alternatif finansal koşullar endekslerinin (FKE) hesaplanması ve öngörü güçlerinin değerlendirilmesini amaçlamaktadır. Bu çerçevede, ilk olarak finansal koşullar endeksleri dört metodolojiye dayanılarak elde edilmiştir: İndirgenmiş form talep denklemleri, VAR genelleştirilmiş etki-tepki fonksiyonları, dinamik faktör modeli ve faktör-genişletilmiş VAR modelleri (FAVARs). Çalışmanın ikinci kısmında alternatif FKE’ler sanayi üretim açığını örneklem içi ve örneklem dışı öngörü gücü açısından karşılaştırılmıştır. Sonuçlar eş varyanslı FAVAR yönteminden elde edilen FKE’nin en iyi örneklem dışı öngörüyü sağladığını ortaya koymaktadır, bu nedenle söz konusu FKE iktisadi aktivitenin öncül bir göstergesi olarak önerilmektedir.

🔖

Cite This Article

Akdeniz, C., Çatık, A. N. (2017). An Analysis of Financial Conditions for Turkey: Evidences from Factor and VAR models. Eskişehir Osmangazi Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Dergisi, Cilt: 12 - Sayı: 1, 99–120. https://ajindex.com/articles/30572

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (9)

  1. ANGELOPOULOU, E., BALFOUSSİA, H. ve GİBSON, H. D. (2014). “Building a Financial Conditions Index for the Euro Area and Selected Euro Area Countries: What Does it Tell Us About the Crisis?”, Economic Modelling, 38, 392-403.
  2. BAŞÇI, E. ve KARA, H. (2011). “Finansal İstikrar ve Para Politikası”, İktisat İşletme ve Finans, 26(302), 9-25.
  3. BERUMENT, M. H., CEYLAN, N. B. ve DOĞAN, B. (2014). “An Interest-Rate-Spread-Based Measure of Turkish Mone-tary Policy”, Applied Economics, 46(15): 1804-1813.
  4. CHOW, H. K. (2013). “Can a Financial Conditions Index Guide Monetary Policy? The Case of Singapore”, Research Collection School of Economics. DOZ, C., GİANNONE, D. ve REİCHLİN, L. (2011). “A Two-Step Estimator For Large Approximate Dynamic Factor Mo-dels Based On Kalman Filtering”, Journal of Econometrics, 164(1), 188-205.
  5. FIORENTINI, G. ve PLANAS, C. (2003). “Busy Program User-Manual”, Joint Research Centre of European Commission, Tools and Practies for Business Cycle Analysis in European Union, EC Fifth Framework Program, Ispra, Italy. FORNI, M., HALLİN, M., LİPPİ, M. ve REİCHLİN, L. (2000a). “Reference Cycles: The NBER Methodology Revisited”, CEPR Discussion Papers, No: 2400. FORNI, M., HALLİN, M., LİPPİ, M. Ve REİCHLİN, L. (2000b). “The Generalised Dynamic Factor Model: Identification and Estimation”, Review of Economics and Statistics, 82(4), 540-554
  6. GAUTHİER, C., GRAHAM, C. ve LİU, Y. (2004). “Financial Conditions Indexes for Canada”, Bank of Canada Working Paper, No: 2004-22.
  7. GOODHART, C. ve HOFMANN, B. (2000). “Financial Variables and the Conduct of Monetary Policy”, Sveriges Riksbank Working Paper, No: 112. GOODHART, C. ve HOFMANN, B. (2001). “Asset Prices, Financial Conditions and the Transmission of Monetary Po-licy”. Paper prepared for the conference on Asset Prices, Exchange Rates, and Monetary Policy, Stanford Univer-sity. 2001
  8. March. GOODHART, C. ve HOFMANN, B. (2002). “Asset Prices and the Conduct of Monetary Policy”, Royal Economic Society Annual Conference, No: 88. GUMATA, N., KLEİN N. ve NDOU E. (2012). “A Financial Condition Index for South Africa”, IMF Working Papers, No: 196. HATZIUS, J., HOOPER, P., MİSHKİN, F. S., SCHOENHOLTZ, K. L. ve WATSON,M. W. (2010) “Financial Conditions In-dexes: A Fresh Look After the Financial Crisis”, NBER Working Paper, No: 16150. HODRICK, R. J. ve PRESCOTT, E. C. (1997). “Postwar U. S. Business Cycles: An Empirical Investigation”, Journal of Money, Credit and Banking, 29(1), 1-16.
  9. KARA, A. H. (2012). “Küresel Kriz Sonra