Disability and affecting factors in Manisa city center

Disability was determined 23.9% of study group.Disability risk in 95%CI was higher in women, 40 years and above , whose have no social security and whose dissatisfied percieved health status 1.57(1.10-2.22), 3.00 (2.14-4.21) and 6.14 (3.91-9.63), 1.65 (1.12-2.39), 3.84 (2.78-5.29) times respectively.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯

Objective & Hypothesis:The aim of this study is to determine disability and affecting factors of adult population in Manisa city center.

📊

Key Findings & Data:Study population is consisted 1336 adults and cluster sampling is performed according to percentage of nine health center district populations.

💡

Conclusion & Impact:Disability was determined 23.9% of study group.Disability risk in 95%CI was higher in women, 40 years and above , whose have no social security and whose dissatisfied percieved health status 1.57(1.10-2.22), 3.00 (2.14-4.21) and 6.14 (3.91-9.63), 1.65 (1.12-2.39), 3.84 (2.78-5.29) times respectively.

🔬Design:Survey & Empirical Study

📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample

⚙️Variables:Erişkin · Engelli kişiler · Anketler

Abstract

The aim of this study is to determine disability and affecting factors of adult population in Manisa city center. Study population is consisted 1336 adults and cluster sampling is performed according to percentage of nine health center district populations. Brief Disability Questionnaire and sociodemographic variables constitute the questionnaire.univariete and multivariete risk approach was performed by using SPSS 10.0 statistical package program in data analysis. Disability was determined 23.9% of study group.Disability risk in 95%CI was higher in women, 40 years and above , whose have no social security and whose dissatisfied percieved health status 1.57(1.10-2.22), 3.00 (2.14-4.21) and 6.14 (3.91-9.63), 1.65 (1.12-2.39), 3.84 (2.78-5.29) times respectively.

Özet

Manisa kent merkezinde yetişkin yaş gurubunda yeti yitimi sıklığını belirlemek amacıyla bu araştırma yürütühnüştür.Kent merkezinde bulunan 9 sağlık'ocağı bölgesinden mahalle nüfuslarına orantılı küme örnekleme yöntemi kullanılmıştır. 1336 kişiden oluşan araştırma gurubuna Kısa Yeti Yitimi Ölçeği ve sosyodemografik özellikleri içeren bir anket formu yüz yüze görüşme yöntemiyle uygulanmıştir.Veri analizinde SPSS 10.0 istatistik programında %95 güven aralığında univariete ve multivariete risk yaklaşımı kullanılmış,çoklu analizlerde lojistik regresyon analizi uygulanmıştir. Araştırma gurubunun %23.9'unda hafif orta ve ağır derecede yeti yitimi olduğu belirlenmiştir. Çok değişkenli analizlere göre.yeti yitimi riskinin kadınlarda 1.57(1.10-2.22), 40.1-65yaş grubunda 3.00 (2.14-4.21),65.1 ve dahayaşlı grupta 6.14 (3.91-9.63),sosyal güvencesi olmayanlarda 1.65 (1.12-2.39) algılanan sağlık durumu kötüolanlarda 3.84 (2.78-5.29) katyüksektir.

Keywords

Erişkin Engelli kişiler Anketler Türkiye Adult Disabled Persons Questionnaires Turkey

🔖

Cite This Article

DÜNDAR, E. P., ÖZYURT, C. B., HORASAN, G. D., YÜKSEL, H., ŞAKAR, A., YORGANCIOĞLU, A. A. (2006). Disability and affecting factors in Manisa city center. Sağlık ve Toplum, Cilt: 16 - Sayı: 1, 25–30. https://ajindex.com/articles/305662

References (2)

l. Starfield B 'Promoting equity in health through resaerch and understanding' Developing World Bioeth. 2004;4(l):76-95. 2. Blane D.smith GD,Bartley M.'Social Class in Years of Potential Life Cost:Size,Trends and Principal Causes' British MedicalJournal 1990;301:429-32. 3. Kaplan G. 'People and Places Contrasting Perspectives on the Association Between Social Class and Health' IntJ Health Services 1996;26(3):507-19. 4 Belek İ. 'Socioeconomic Inequities in Perdeved Health in Antalya, Turkey'IntMed Journal 1999:6(3):224-9. S.Weich s,,,Lewis G.'Material Standard of Living, Social Class and the Prevalence of Common Mental Disorders in Great Britain'JEpi and Community Health 1998:52:8-14. 6. Sentes K,Kipp W.' Global Burden of Diseases: Huge Inequities in the Health Status in Developing and Developed Countries'Health Mange Forum 2003; 16(3): 27-9. 7. Lehmann P.Mamboury C.Minder CE. 'Health and social inequities in Switzerland'SocSciMed.l990;31(3);369-86. 8. Zere E,Mc Intyre D.'Equity in self-reported adult illness and use of health service in South Africa:İnter-temporal comparison 'JHealth PopulNutr2003;21(3):20S-15. 9. Belek I 'Sağlıkta Eşitsizliklerin Değişimi Antalya'da Beş Yıllık Bir Araştırma'Toplum ve Hekim.2004;19(2):92-100. 10. Kaplan t.'Yan Kırsal Bir Alanda Sağlık Ocağına Başvuran Hastalarda Yeti Yitimi' Türk Psikiyatri Dergisi 1995:6:169-79. ll. Bingefors S KJsacron D. ' Epidemiology.co-morbidity and impact on health related quality of self reported headache and musculoskeletal pain-a gender perspective' EurJPain.2004;8(5):425-50. 12. Kunst A E,Mackenbach J P. 'Measuring Socioeconomic Inequities in Health '1995,
Copenhagen, WHO. 13. CavelaarsA, KunstA E.GeurtsJG 'Differences in Self Reported Morbiditiy by Educational Level:A Comparison of 11 Western European Countries' Journal Epidemiol Comm.Health 2002; 52:219-27. 14. Erengin H.,Dedeoğlu N.,' Sağlığı Ölçmenin Kolay Bir Yolu: Algılanan Sağlık' Toplum ve Hekim. 1997; 12(77): 11-16. 15. Noack H.' Conceptualizing and Measuring Health' in. Badura B.,Kickbush L(Eds) Health Promotion Research, Copenhagen: WHO Regional Publications.European Series No:37J991. 16. Kaplan G A., Camacho T' Perdeved Health and Mortality: A Nine Year Follow-up Of The Human Population Laboratory Cohort'Am. J.Epidemiol. 1983; 117:292-304.