Journals / Retina-Vitreus / 2002 / Cilt: 10 - Sayı: 2

Effects of background diabetic retinopathy on visual field

Background diabetik retinopatinin görme alanına etkisi

Pages
164–169
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Ret-vit 2001; 10 :164 -169.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Purpose: To demonstrate how the central visual field was affected by different stimulus in patients with background diabetic retinopathy (BDR).
📊
Key Findings & Data:Methods: The central 24-2 threshold test with the strategy of fastpac on white background with both white and blue stimulus were done in 28 ( 20 women, 8 men ) patients with the diabetes mellitus without retinopathy, in 15 (10 women, 5 men ) patients with B DR and 26 ( 15 women, 11 men) individuals without any systemic disorders.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Ret-vit 2001; 10 :164 -169.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:2001 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Retina hastalıkları · Diabetik retinopati · Diabetik anjiyopatiler

Abstract

Purpose: To demonstrate how the central visual field was affected by different stimulus in patients with background diabetic retinopathy (BDR). Methods: The central 24-2 threshold test with the strategy of fastpac on white background with both white and blue stimulus were done in 28 ( 20 women, 8 men ) patients with the diabetes mellitus without retinopathy, in 15 (10 women, 5 men ) patients with B DR and 26 ( 15 women, 11 men) individuals without any systemic disorders. Results: The averages of mean deviation (MD), pattern standard deviation (PSD), short term fluctuation (SF), corrected pattern standard deviation (CPSD) were found as -5.6 ±3.9 dB, 3.8 ±2.2 dB, 3.1 ±1.3 dB, 2 ±2.3 dB respectively, in the normal individuals. This index values in diabetics without retinopathy were found as -4.3 ±3.8 dB, 3.6 ±1.8 dB, 2.6 ±1.1 dB, 1.9 ±1.9 dB. In diabetics with background retinopathy, those were determined as -5.9 ±4.5 dB, 4.3 ±2.5 dB, 2.9 ±1.3 dB, 2.8 ±2.7 dB. The differences among those indices were not statistically significant (p>0.05). In addition, the differences among the averages of the sums of threshold of both stimulus did not find statistically significant in four quadrants (p>0.05). Conclusion: BDR does not affect the sensitivity of visual field results tested on white background with white and blue stimulus. Ret-vit 2001; 10 :164 -169.

Özet

Amaç: "Background" diabetik retinopatili (BDR) hastalarda, santral görme alanının, değişik uyaranlarla nasıl etkilendiğini saptamak. Gereç ve yöntem: Diabetes mellitus tanısı almış, retinopatisi olmayan 28 hastaya (20 kadın, 8 erkek), BDR1 li 15 hastaya (10 kadın, 5 erkek) ve sistemik hastalığı olmayan 26 kişiye (15 kadın, 11 erkek), santral 24-2 eşik testi, fastpac test stratejisinde beyaz zeminde, beyaz ve mavi uyaranla yapıldı. Bulgular: Normal olgularda, "mean deviation" (MD), "pattern standard deviation" (PSD), "short term fluctuation" (SF), "corrected pattern standard deviation" (CPSD) ortalamaları sırasıyla, -5.6 ±3.9 dB, 3.8 ±2.2 dB, 3.1 ±1.3 dB, 2 ±2.3 dB olarak bulundu. Diabetik, fakat retinopatisi olmayanlarda bu indeks değerleri -4.3 ±3.8 dB, 3.6 ±1.8 dB, 2.6 ±1.1 dB, 1.9 ±1.9 dB olarak bulundu. BDR' si olanlarda ise bunlar -5.9 ±4.5 dB, 4.3 ±2.5 dB, 2.9 ±1.3 dB, 2.8 ±2.7 dB olarak saptandı. Bu global indeksler arasındaki farklar istatistiksel olarak anlamlı değildi (p>0.05). Ayrıca her iki uyaranın dört kadrandaki eşik değer toplamlarının ortalamaları arasındaki fark istatistiksel olarak anlamlı bulunmadı (p>0.05). Sonuç: BDR, beyaz zeminde beyaz ve mavi uyaranla yapılan görme alanı sonuçlarının duyarlılığını etkilememektedir.

🔖

Cite This Article

AYDOĞAN, N., PELİT, A., EVYAPAN, Ö., AKMAN, A., AYDIN, P. (2002). Effects of background diabetic retinopathy on visual field. Retina-Vitreus, Cilt: 10 - Sayı: 2, 164–169. https://ajindex.com/articles/305412

References (13)

  1. Henricsson M, Heijl A. Visual fields at different stages of diabetic retinopathy. Acta Ophthalmol 1994, 72: 560-9
  2. Chee CK, Flanagan DW. Visual field loss with capillary non-perfusion in preproliferative and early pro-liferative diabetic retinopathy. Br J Ophthalmol 1993, 77:726-30
  3. Moloney J, Dairy. ML Retinopathy and retinal function in insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus. Br J Ophthalmol 1982,66:759-61
  4. Trick GL, Bürde RM, Gordon MO et al. The relationship between hue discrimination and contrast sensitivity deficits in patients with diabetes mellitus. Ophthalmology 1988,95:693-8
  5. Arden GB, Hamilton AM, Wilson-Holt J et al. Pattern electroretinograms become abnormal when background diabetic retinopathy deteriorates to a preproliferative stage: possible use as a screening test. Br J Ophthalmol 1986,70:330-5
  6. Parisi V, Uccioli L. Visual electrophysiological responses in persons with type 1 diabetes. Diabetes Metab Res Rev 2001,17:12-8
  7. Gündüz K. Diabetik retinopatide hücresel hasarın tespitinde elektroretinografinin güvenilirliği. MN Oftalmoloji 1997,4:231-5 8. Bayraktar MZ: Diabetik retinopati epidemiyolojisi. Özkan S, Akar S (ed). Diabetik retinopati. Dilek Ofset, İstanbul, 2000, s:5-6 9. Gürler B, Vural H, Yılmaz N, Oğuz H, Satıcı A. Diabetik retinopatide oksidatif stresin rolü. MN Oftalmoloji 2000,7: 107-11 10. Zucca I, Tanda A, Piras V, Mulas S, Mureddu E, Lecis F, Sulis R, Palmas MC, Fossarello M, Serra A. The influence of diabetes mellitus on primary open angle glaucoma perimetry. Acta Ophthalmol Scand Suppl 1997,224:49-50
  8. Albert Aim: Retinal blood flow and different diagnostic procedures. In Stamper RL: Retinal vascular disorders W B Saunder Company. Philadelphia, 1998, p:491
  9. Bek T, Lund-Andersen H. Localised blood-retinal barrier leakage and retinal light sensitivity in diabetic retinopathy. Br J Ophthalmol 1990,74:388-92
  10. Bek T, Lund-Andersen H. Cotton-wool spots and retinal light sensitivity in diabetic retinopathy. Br J Ophthalmol 1991,75:13-7
  11. Lobefalo L, Verrotti A, Mastropasqua L et al. Blue-on-yellow and achromatic perimetry in diabetic children without retinopathy. Diabetes Care 1998, 21:2003-6
  12. Nomura R, Terasaki H, Hirose H, Miyaké Y. Blue-on-yellow perimetry to evaluate S cone sensitivity in diabetics. Ophthalmic Res 2000, 32:69-72
  13. Cho NC, Poulsen GL, Ver Hoeve JN et al. Selective loss of S-cones in diabetic retinopathy. Arch Ophthalmol 2000, 118:1393-400.