Journals / Retina-Vitreus / 2004 / Cilt: 12 - Sayı: 3

Vitreoretinal surgery for retinal detachment secondary to open globe injuries

Açık göz yaralanması sonrası gelişen retina dekolmanlarında vitreoretinal cerrahi

Pages
176–179
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Conclusion: Anatomical success can be achieved by vitreoretinal surgery in most cases with retinal detachment secondary to open globe injury; however, visual prognosis remains limited.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Purpose: To evaluate the anatomic and visual outcomes of vitreoretinal surgery in the treatment of retinal detachment secondary to open globe injury.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Materials and Methods: In this retrospective study, we evaluated 19 patients (15 men, 4 women) who had retinal detachments secondary to 14 penetrating and 5 perforating trauma.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Conclusion: Anatomical success can be achieved by vitreoretinal surgery in most cases with retinal detachment secondary to open globe injury; however, visual prognosis remains limited.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Retina dekolmanı · Geriyedönük çalışma · Vitrektomi

Abstract

Purpose: To evaluate the anatomic and visual outcomes of vitreoretinal surgery in the treatment of retinal detachment secondary to open globe injury. Materials and Methods: In this retrospective study, we evaluated 19 patients (15 men, 4 women) who had retinal detachments secondary to 14 penetrating and 5 perforating trauma. Pars plana vitrectomy, retinal reattachment by perfluorocarbon liquids and internal tamponades were performed in all cases. Additionaly, epiretinal membrane removal in 17 eyes, retinectomy in 6 eyes, intravitreal lens aspiration for dislocated lenses in 4 eyes and lensectomy in 2 eyes were performed. Main outcome measures were, anatomical and functional results and surgical complications. Results: Mean age of the patients was 32 years (6-75 years) and mean follow-up time was 7.4 months (3-24 months). Preoperative visual acuity was counting fingers at 1 meter or worse in all cases. Total retinal reattachment in 16 eyes (84.2%), macular reattachment with peripheral recurrent detachment in 2 eyes (10.5%) and total recurrent retinal redetachment with severe proliferative vitreoretinopathy in 1 eye (5.26%) were observed after primary and secondary procedures. Postoperative visual acuity was 1/10 or better in 6 eyes (31.6%) and 1/10 or worse in 13 eyes (68.4%). Retinal redetachment in 7 eyes, development of epiretinal membrane in 5 eyes, cataract formation in 4 eyes, silicone oil emulsification in 1 eye and corneal decompansation due to silicone oil in 1 eye were observed as postoperative complications. Conclusion: Anatomical success can be achieved by vitreoretinal surgery in most cases with retinal detachment secondary to open globe injury; however, visual prognosis remains limited.

Özet

Amaç: Açık göz yaralanması sonrası retina dekolmanı gelişen olgularda vitreoretinal cerrahinin görsel ve anatomik sonuçlarını irdelemek. Yöntem: Bu retrospektif çalışmada, 14'ü penetran, 5'i perforan travmaya ikincil retina dekolmanı olan 19 olgu (15 erkek, 4 kadın) incelendi. Tüm olgularda pars plana vitrektomi, sıvı perflorokarbon ile retinanın yatıştırılması ve internal tamponad uygulandı. Ek olarak, 17 olguya epiretinal membran soyulması, 6 olguya retinektomi, 4 olguya vitreus içine disloke lens için intravitreal lens aspirasyonu ve 2 olguya da lensektomi uygulandı. Çalışmamızda araştırdığımız ana parametreler, anatomik ve görsel sonuçlar ile cerrahi komplikasyonlar idi. Bulgular: Yaş ortalaması 32 (6-75) olan olgular ortalama 7,4 ay (3-24 ay) takip edildi. Preoperatif görme keskinliği tüm olgularda 1 mps ve altında idi. Birincil ya da ikincil girişimler sonucunda, 16 (%84,2) olguda retina ve maküla yatıştırıldı; 2 (%10.5) olguda maküla yatıştırıldı ancak periferde retina dekolmanının nüks ettiği gözlendi; 1 (%5.26) olguda ise ciddi proliferatif vitreoretinopatili nüks retina dekolmanı gelişti. Postoperatif görme keskinliği 6 (%31,6) olguda 1/10 ve üzeri, 13 (%68,4) olguda ise 1/10'un altında idi. Postoperatif komplikasyon olarak, 7 olguda nüks retina dekolmanı, 5 olguda epiretinal membran gelişimi, 4 olguda katarakt, 1 olguda silikon emülsifikasyonu ve 1 olguda ise silikona bağlı kornea dekompansasyonu gözlendi. Sonuç: Açık göz yaralanması sonrası retina dekolmanı gelişen olgularda vitreoretinal cerrahinin çoğu olguda anatomik başarı sağlamasına karşın, görsel prognoz üzerine etkisinin sınırlı kaldığı gözlendi.

🔖

Cite This Article

YANYALI, A., ÇELİK, E., HOROZOĞLU, F., ERÇALIK, Y., NOHUTÇU, A. F. (2004). Vitreoretinal surgery for retinal detachment secondary to open globe injuries. Retina-Vitreus, Cilt: 12 - Sayı: 3, 176–179. https://ajindex.com/articles/305380

References (19)

  1. Schein OD, Hibberd PL, Shigleton BJ, et al.: The spectrum ans burden of ocular injury. Ophthalmology 1988;95:300-305
  2. Kargı SH, Hoşal B, Saygı S, ve ark.: Göz travmalarının epidemiyolojik değerlendirilmesi. MN Oftalmol 1998;5:385-389
  3. Esmaeli B, Einer SCI, Schork MA, et al.: Visual outcome and ocular survival after penetrating trauma (a cfinicopathologic study). Ophthalmology 1995; 102:393-400
  4. Maquire AM, Enger C, Eliott D, et al.: Computerized tomography in the evaluation of penetrating ocular injuries. Retina 1991; 11:405-411
  5. Shock JF) Adams D.: Long-term visual acuity results after penetrating and perforating ocular injuries. Am J Ophthalmol 1985,100:714-718
  6. Dürük K, Budak K, Turaçlı E, ve ark.: Delici göz yaralanmalarında prognostik faktörler. T Oft Gaz 1994;24:216-219
  7. Hutton WL, Fuller DG.: Factors influencing final visual results in severly injured eyes. Am J Ophthalmol 1984; 97:715-722
  8. StoneTW, Siddiqui N, Arroyo JG, et al.: Primary scierai buckling in open globe injury involving the posterior segment. Ophthalmology 2000; 107:1923-1926
  9. Matthews GP, Das A.: Visual outcome and ocular survival in patients With retinal detachments secondary to open- or closed -globe injuries. Ophthalmic Surg Lasers 1998; 1:48-54
  10. Kuhn F, Morris R, et al.: A standardized classification of ocular trauma. Ophthalmology 1996; 103:240-243
  11. Pieramici DJ, Stenberg P, Aaberg AM et al. A system for classifying mechanical injuries of the eye (globe). Am J Ophthalmol 1997; 123:820-831
  12. Adhikary HP, Taylor P, Fitzmaurice DJ.: Prognosis of perforating eye injury. Br J. Ophthalmol 1976; 60:737-739
  13. Cinotti AA, Maltzman BA.: Prognosis and treatment of perforating ocular injuries. The John Luhr memorial lecture. Ophthalmic Surg 1975; 6:54-61
  14. Coles WH, Haik GM-: Vitrectomy in intraocular trauma. Arch Ophthalmol 1972; 87:621-628
  15. Han DP,»Mieler WF,. Schwartz DM, et al.: Management of traumatic hemorrhagic retinal detachment with pars plana vitrectomy. Arch Ophthalmol 1990; 108:1281-1286
  16. Liggett *PE, Gauderman WJ, Moreira CM, et al. Pars plana vitrectomy for acute retinal detachment in penetrating ocular injuries. Arch Ophthalmol 1990; 108:1724-1728
  17. Meredith TA, Gordon PA.: Pars plana vitrectomy for severe penetrating injury with posterior segment involvement. Am J Ophthalmol 1987; 103:549-554
  18. Ramsey RC, Cantril HL.: Vitrectomy for double penetrating ocular injuries. Am J Ophthalmol 1985; 100:586-589
  19. Vatne HO, S