Journals / Eskişehir Osmangazi Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Dergisi / 2018 / Cilt: 13 - Sayı: 1

Determination of Factors Affecting Financial Fragility in Banks Using Panel Data Analysis

Bankalarda Finansal Kırılganlığı Etkileyen Faktörlerin Panel Veri Analizi ile Belirlenmesi

Pages
15–38
Publication Date
2018-04-15
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

In model 2, A statistically significant and positive relationship was observed between capital adequacy ratio and net interest margin and return on assets while a statistically significant and negative relationship was observed between capital adequacy ratio and financial leverage and return on equity.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:In the study, it is aimed to determine the micro factors that affect the financial fragility of the commercial banks which are continuously operating in the Turkish banking sector during 2002-2015 period.
📊
Key Findings & Data:At the end of the analysis, In model 1, A statistically significant and negative relationship was observed between bank size and non performing loan ratio while a statistically significant and positive relationship was observed between liquid ratio and non performing loan ratio.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:In model 2, A statistically significant and positive relationship was observed between capital adequacy ratio and net interest margin and return on assets while a statistically significant and negative relationship was observed between capital adequacy ratio and financial leverage and return on equity.
🔬Design:Modeling & Simulation
📍Scope:2002-2015 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Finansal Kırılganlık · Banka · Panel Veri Analizi

Abstract

In the study, it is aimed to determine the micro factors that affect the financial fragility of the commercial banks which are continuously operating in the Turkish banking sector during 2002-2015 period. Financial fragility is represented by the non performing loan ratio and capital adequacy ratio while the micro factors are represented by return on assets, return on equity, liquid ratio, bank size, financial leverage and net interest margin. Two different models were composed to determine the factors affecting financial fragility. These models were analyzed by panel data method. At the end of the analysis, In model 1, A statistically significant and negative relationship was observed between bank size and non performing loan ratio while a statistically significant and positive relationship was observed between liquid ratio and non performing loan ratio. In model 2, A statistically significant and positive relationship was observed between capital adequacy ratio and net interest margin and return on assets while a statistically significant and negative relationship was observed between capital adequacy ratio and financial leverage and return on equity.

Özet

Çalışmada, Türkiye bankacılık sektöründe 2002-2015 döneminde devamlı olarak faaliyet gösteren ticaret bankalarının finansal kırılganlıklarına etki eden mikro faktörlerin ortaya çıkarılması amaçlanmıştır. Finansal kırılganlık, takipteki kredi oranı ve sermaye yeterlilik rasyosu ile temsil edilirken; mikro faktörler ise aktif karlılık oranı, özsermaye karlılığı, likidite oranı, banka büyüklüğü, finansal kaldıraç ve net faiz marjı ile temsil edilmiştir. Finansal kırılganlığa etki eden faktörlerin tespit edilebilmesi için iki ayrı model oluşturulmuştur. Bu modeller panel veri yöntemi ile analiz edilmiştir. Analiz neticesinde, model 1’de takipteki kredi oranı ile banka büyüklüğü arasında anlamlı ve negatif ilişki tespit edilirken; likidite oranı ile anlamlı ve pozitif ilişki tespit edilmiştir. Model 2’de ise sermaye yeterlilik oranı ile net faiz marjı ve aktif karlılık oranı arasında anlamlı ve pozitif ilişki belirlenirken; finansal kaldıraç ve özsermaye karlılığı ile anlamlı ve negatif ilişki belirlenmiştir.

🔖

Cite This Article

TOPALOĞLU, E. E. (2018). Determination of Factors Affecting Financial Fragility in Banks Using Panel Data Analysis. Eskişehir Osmangazi Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Dergisi, Cilt: 13 - Sayı: 1, 15–38. https://ajindex.com/articles/30535

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (13)

  1. Ahumada, Antonio; Budnevich, Carlos (2002), Some Measures of Financial Fragility in the Chilean Banking System: An Early Warning Indicators Application, L. Hernandez ve K.S. Hebbel, (Eds.), Banking, Fi-nancial Integration and International Crisis içinde, Santiago: Central Bank of Chile, 175-197.
  2. Allen, Franklin; Gale, Douglas (2004), “Financial Fragility, Liquidity And Asset Prices”, Journal of the European Economic Association, 2 (6), 1015–1048.
  3. Asteriou, Dimitrios; Hall, Stephen (2007), Applied Econometrics: A Modern Approach Using Eviews and Mic-rofit Revisited Edition, Newyork: Palgrave Macmillan. Bai, Jushan; Ng, Serena (2004), “A PANIC Attack on Unit Roots and Cointegration”, Econometrica, 72 (4), 1127–1177.
  4. Baltagi, Badi; Li, Qi (1991), “A Joint Test for Serial Correlation and Random Individual Effects”, Statistics and Probability Letters, 11, 277-280. Bankacılık Düzenleme ve Denetleme Kurumu (2017), İstatistiki Veriler, http://www.bddk.org.tr/WebSitesi/turkce/Istatistiki_Veriler/Istatistiki_Veriler.aspx.
  5. Beck, Nathaniel; Katz, Jonathan (1995), “What To Do (and Not to Do) with Time-Series Cross-Section Data”, American Political Science Review, 89 (3), 634-647.
  6. Bhargava, Alok; Franzini, Luisa; Narendranathan, Wiji (1982), “Serial Correlation and the Fixed Effects Mo-del”, The Review of Economic Studies, 49 (4), 533–549.
  7. Born, Benjamin; Breitung, Jörg (2016), “Testing for Serial Correlation in Fixed-Effects Panel Data Models”, Econometric Reviews, 35 (7), 1290-1316.
  8. Bostandzic, Denefa (2016), “Bank Fragility and Interconnectedness”, World-Finance-Conference. Breitung, Jörg (2005), “A Parametric approach to the Estimation of Cointegration Vectors in Panel Data”, Econometric Reviews, 24 (2), 151-173.
  9. Breuer, Janice Boucher; McNown, Robert; Wallace, Myles (2002), “Series-Specific Unit Root Tests With Panel Data”, Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics, 64, 527-546.
  10. Breusch, Trevor; Pagan, Adrian (1979), “A simple Test For Heteroscedasticity And Random Coefficient Varia-tion”, Econometrica, 47, 1287–1294.
  11. Breusch, Trevor; Pagan, Adrian (1980), “The Lagrange Multiplier Test and Its Applications to Model Specifica-tion in Econometrics”, Review of Economic Studies, 47 (1), 239-253.
  12. Bruno, Oliver; Cartapanis, Andre; Nasica, Eric (2013), “Bank Leverage, Financial Fragility and Prudential Regu-lation. Bank Leverage, Financial Fragility and Prudential Regulation”, Working Paper, No: 14, 1-36.
  13. Choi, In (2001), “Unit Root Tests For Panel Data”, J. Int. Money