Journals / Retina-Vitreus / 2008 / Cilt: 16 - Sayı: 2

Santral retinal ven tıkanıklığında intravitreal triamsinolonlu veya triamsinolonsuz radyal optik nörotomi sonuçları

Results of radial optic neurotomy with or without ıntravitreal triamcinolone for central retinal vein occlusion

Pages
101–106
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Conclusions: RON surgery with or without peroperative IVTA led to a significant decrease in central macular thickness but its functional success is very limited in eyes with preoperative BCVA of less than 20/200 and probably is not better than the natural history.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Purpose: To evaluate the efficacy of radial optic neurotomy (RON) with or without intravitreal triamcinolone in improving visual acuity in central retinal vein occlusion (CRVO).
📊
Key Findings & Data:Materials and Methods: We performed vitrectomy and RON to 16 eyes of 16 patients with CRVO with a best corrected visual acuity (BCVA) of 20/200 or less.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Conclusions: RON surgery with or without peroperative IVTA led to a significant decrease in central macular thickness but its functional success is very limited in eyes with preoperative BCVA of less than 20/200 and probably is not better than the natural history.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Triamsinolon · Vitrektomi · İntraoperatif komplikasyonlar

Abstract

Purpose: To evaluate the efficacy of radial optic neurotomy (RON) with or without intravitreal triamcinolone in improving visual acuity in central retinal vein occlusion (CRVO). Materials and Methods: We performed vitrectomy and RON to 16 eyes of 16 patients with CRVO with a best corrected visual acuity (BCVA) of 20/200 or less. Eight of them re- ceived an injection of 4mg intravitreal triamcinolone (IVTA) at the completion of the surgery. The major outcome pa- rameter was defined as an improvement of BCVA of 2 or more lines and final BCVA better than 20/200. Decrease in central macular thickness was our secondary outcome parameter. Intraoperative and postoperative complications were also evaluated. Results: Eleven (68.8%) of the eyes were evaluated as ischemic based on fluorescein angiography and presence of relative afferent pupillary defect. Only 2 (12.5%) patients had BCVA of better than 20/200 postoperatively. Central macular thickness was significantly reduced from 811±303 &#956; to 444±276 &#956; (p<0.01). Preoperative visual acuity and age were significant factors in affecting final BCVA of better than 20/200 (p=0.02 and p=0.05, respectively). One patient underwent trabeculectomy because of intractable open angle glaucoma. One additional patient developed neovascular glaucoma and was treated with diod laser cyclophotocoagulation. Conclusions: RON surgery with or without peroperative IVTA led to a significant decrease in central macular thickness but its functional success is very limited in eyes with preoperative BCVA of less than 20/200 and probably is not better than the natural history.

Özet

Amaç: Santral retinal ven tıkanıklığında (SRVT) intravitreal triamsinolonlu veya triamsinolonsuz radyal optik nöroto- minin (RON) görme keskinliğini iyileştirmedeki etkinliğini değerlendirmek. Gereç ve Yöntemler: En iyi düzeltilmiş görme keskinliği (EİDGK) 20/200 veya altında olan 16 SRVT hastasının 16 gözüne RON uyguladık. Gözlerden sekizine ameliyatın bitiminde 4mg triamsinolon intravitreal olarak uygulan- dı (IVTA). EİDGK’da 2 sıra veya daha fazla artış ve sonuç EİDGK’nın 20/200 üzerinde olması ana hedef olarak be- lirlendi.Merkezi retina kalınlığındaki azalma ikincil hedefti. Ameliyat esnasında ve sonrasındaki komplikasyonlar da değerlendirildi. Bulgular: Floresein anjiyografiye dayanılarak gözlerin 11’i (%68.8) iskemik olarak değerlendirildi. Ameliyat son- rası dönemda yalnızca 2 (%12.5) hastanın EİDGK’sı 20/200’den daha iyiydi. Merkezi retina kalınlığı anlamlı bir şekilde 811±303 μ’dan 444±276 μ’a geriledi (p<0.01). ameliyat öncesi EİDGK ve yaş 20/200’den daha iyi sonuç görmeye ulaşmayı etkileyen faktörler olarak saptandı (sı- rasıyla p=0.02 ve p=0.05). Bir hastaya tedaviye dirençli glokom nedeniyle trabekülectomi uygulandı. Bir hastada da neovasküler glokom gelişti ve diyod lazer siklofotokoa- gülasyon ile tedavi edildi. Sonuç: İVTA’lı veya IVTA’sız RON cerrahisi merkezi retina ka- lınlığında anlamlı azalma sağladı fakat ameliyat öncesi EİDGK’sı 20/200 altında olan gözlerde fonksiyonel başa- rısı çok sınırlıdır ve muhtemelen doğal seyirden daha iyi değildir.

🔖

Cite This Article

ALTAN, T., ACAR, N., KAPRAN, Z., ÜNVER, Y. B., ÖZDOĞAN, S., KÜÇÜKSÜMER, Y. (2008). Santral retinal ven tıkanıklığında intravitreal triamsinolonlu veya triamsinolonsuz radyal optik nörotomi sonuçları. Retina-Vitreus, Cilt: 16 - Sayı: 2, 101–106. https://ajindex.com/articles/305228

References (17)

  1. The Central Vein Oclusion Study Group: Baseline and early na- tural history report: The Central Vein Occlusion Study. Arch oph- thalmol. 1993;111:1087-1095
  2. The Central Vein Occlusion Study Group: Natural history and clinical management of central retinal vein occlusion. Arch Oph- thalmology. 1997;115:486-491
  3. Hayreh SS.: Classification of central retinal occlusion. Ophthal- mology. 1983;90:458-474
  4. Mitchell P Smith W, Chang A: Prevalence and associations of re- tinal vein occlusion in Australia: the Blue Mountains Eye Study. Arch Ophthalmol. 1996;114:1243-1247
  5. Klein R, Klein BE, Moss SE, Meuer SM: The epidemiology of retinal vein occlusion: the Beaver Dam Eye Study. Trans Am Ophthalmol Soc. 2000;98:133-141&141-143
  6. Williamson TH: Central retinal vein occlusion: what’s the story? British J Ophthalmol. 1997;81:698-704
  7. Hayreh S.S.: Reply to radial optic neurotomy needs evaluation in a controlled prospective trial. Ophthalmologica. 2004;218:145- 146
  8. The Central Vein Occlusion Study Group Report: Evaluation of grid pattern photocoagulation for macular edema in central vein occlusion. Ophtalmology. 1995;102:1425-1433
  9. Hayreh SS.: Management of central retinal vein occlusion. Oph- thalmologica. 1993;217:167-188
  10. Fekrat S, Finkelstein D.: Current concepts in the management of central retinal vein occlusion. Curr Opin Ophthalmol. 1997;8:50- 54
  11. Parodi MB: Medical treatment of retinal vein occlusions. Semin Ophthalmol. 2004;19:43-48
  12. McAlister IL, Douglas JP Constable IJ, Yu DY: Laser induced cho- rioretinal anastomosis for non-ischemic central retinal vein occ- lusion: evluation of the complications an their risk factors. Am J Ophthalmol. 1998;126:219-229
  13. Opremcak EM, Bruce RA, Lomeo MD, et al.: Radial optic neuro- tomy for central retinal vein occlusion; a retrospective pilot study of 11 consecutive cases. Retina. 2001;21:408-415
  14. Hikichi T, Konno S, Trempe CL: Role of the vitreous in central retinal vein occlusion. Retina. 1995;15:29-33
  15. Kado M, Jalkh AE, Yoshida A, et al.: Vitreous changes and ma- cular edema in central retinal vein occlusion. Ophthalmic Surg. 1990;21:544-549
  16. Leizaola-Fernández C, Suárez-Tatá L, Quiroz-Mercado H, et al.: Vitrectomy with complete posterior hyaloid removal for ischemic central retinal vein occlusion: series of cases. BMC Ophthalmol; 2005;5:10
  17. Mandelcorn MS, Nrusimhadevara RK: Internal limiting membra- ne peeling for decompression of macular edema in retinal vein occ