Journals / Eskişehir Osmangazi Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Dergisi / 2018 / Cilt: 13 - Sayı: 3

Theoretical Overview of Behavioral Finance

Davranışsal Finansa Kurumsal Bakış

Pages
141–160
Publication Date
2018-12-31
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

With the paradigm shift, financial markets have not changed but our financial markets have changed without understanding.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:There are a large number of studies in the field of behavioral finance carried out at national and international level.
📊
Key Findings & Data:The assessments show that finance has shown its transformation since the 1960s after 1980, and this paradigm shift has led to the birth and development of behavioral finance theory.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:With the paradigm shift, financial markets have not changed but our financial markets have changed without understanding.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Neoklasik finans · Davranışsal finans · Matematiksel yaklaşım

Abstract

There are a large number of studies in the field of behavioral finance carried out at national and international level. Despite these numerous studies, however, there is no general evaluation of behavioral finance theory from the point of view of methodological and theoretical perspectives. This study evaluates and compares the basic concepts and theories from the perspectives in order to make the related deficiencies. For this purpose, the concepts of homoeconomicus, utility, rational - normal investors and effective market hypothesis, knowledge and mathematical approach, risk, emotion and decision making are discussed. Neoclassical finance and behavioral finance are examined in this framework and basic assumptions are critical. The assessments show that finance has shown its transformation since the 1960s after 1980, and this paradigm shift has led to the birth and development of behavioral finance theory. With the paradigm shift, financial markets have not changed but our financial markets have changed without understanding.

Özet

Davranışsal finans alanında ulusal ve uluslararası düzeyde yapılan çok sayıda çalışma vardır. Ancak sayıca çok olan bu çalışmalara rağmen davranışsal finans teorisine metodolojik ve kuramsal bakış açısı ile genel bir değerlendirme yapılmamıştır. Bu çalışmada ilgili eksikliği gidermek amacıyla temel kavramlar ve teoriler perspektifinden değerlendirmeler ve karşılaştırmalar yapılmaktadır. Bu amaçla homoeconomicus, fayda, rasyonel – normal yatırımcılar ve etkin piyasalar hipotezi, bilgi ve matematiksel yaklaşım, risk, duygu ve karar alma kavramları ele alınmıştır. Neoklasik finans ve davranışsal finans bu çerçevede incelenmiş ve temel kabulleri kritik edilmiştir. Yapılan değerlendirmeler göstermektedir ki finans, 1960 sonrası gösterdiği dönüşümü 1980 sonrasında da göstermiş ve bu paradigma değişimine sebep olarak davranışsal finans teorisinin doğup gelişmesine sebep olmuştur. Paradigma değişimi ile finansal piyasalar değişmemiştir ama bizim finansal piyasaları anlayışımız değişmiştir.

🔖

Cite This Article

AREN, S. (2018). Theoretical Overview of Behavioral Finance. Eskişehir Osmangazi Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Dergisi, Cilt: 13 - Sayı: 3, 141–160. https://ajindex.com/articles/30513

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (2)

  1. Aggarwal Raj (2014). Animal spirits in financial economics: A review of deviations from economic rationality, International Review of Financial Analysis 32 179–187 (10.1016/j.irfa.2013.07.018) Akerlof, George A. and Shiller, Robert.J. (2009) Animal Spirits: How Human Psychology Drives the Economy, and Why It Matters for Global Capitalism. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press. (Çev:Neşenur Domaniç ve Levent Konyar, Scala Yayıncılık, 2010 Türkiye) Baker, Malcolm, Ruback, Richard S. and Wurgler Jeffrey (2007), “Behavioral Corporate Finance: a Survey,” Handbook in Corporate Finance: Empirical Corporate Finance, 1, ed. B. Espen Eckbo, 145-186.
  2. Elsevier, Amsterdam Barke Richard P., Smith, Hank Jenkins and Slovic Paul (1997), “Risk Perceptions of Men and Women Scientists”, Social Science Quarterly, 78(1), 167-176 ( Bernheim, Douglas, Garrett, Daniel and Maki, Dean. (2001) Education and saving: the long-term effects of high school financial curriculum mandates. Journal of Public Economics 80 (3) 435–465. 8 (10.3386/w6085) Berridge Kent and Winkielman, Piotr (2003), “What is an unconscious emotion?(The case for unconscious "liking")”, Cognition and Emotion, 17(2), 181-211. (10.1080/02699930302289) Black, Fischer (1986). Noise. Journal of Finance, 41, 529–543. (10.1111/j.1540-6261.1986.tb04513.x) Bouyer Muriel, Bagdassarian Sophie, Chaabanne Sveti, Mullet Etienne (2001), “Personality Correlates of Risk Perception”, Risk Analysis, 21(3), 457-465. (10.1111/0272-4332.213125) Brandstatter Eduard, Kühberger Anton and Schneider Friedrich (2002), “A Cognitive-Emotional Account of the Shape of the Probability Weighting Function”, Journal of Behavioral Decision Making, 15(2), 79-100. (10.1002/bdm.404) Brennan, Thomas J., and Lo, Andrew W. 2011. The origin of behavior. Quarterly Journal of Finance 1 (1): 55-108. (10.1142/S201013921100002X) Buturovic, Zeljka & Tasic, Slavisa (2015), Kahneman's Failed Revolution Against Economic Orthodoxy, Critical Review 27(2), 127-145 (10.1080/08913811.2015.1068512) De Bondt Werner, Mayoral Rosa M. & Vallelado Eleuterio. (2013). Behavioral decision-making in finance: An overview and assessment of selected research. Revista Española De Financiación Y Contabilidad, 42 (157) 99-118 (10.1080/02102412.2013.10779742)De Bondt Werner, Muradoglu Gulnur, Shefrin Hersh, Staikouras Sotiris K. (2008), Behavioral Finance: Quo Vadis?, Journal Of Applied Finance Fall/Winter, 7–21 Erb Hans-Peter and Bioy Antoine Hilton Denis J. (2002), “Choice Preferenc