Journals / Retina-Vitreus / 2013 / Cilt: 21 - Sayı: 4

To compare combined surgery and separate surgery in eyes coexisting with cataract and vitreoretinal pathology

Katarakta eşlik eden retina hastalığı olan olgularda aynı seansta ve ayrı seanslarda uygulanan girişimlerin karşılaştırılması

Pages
287–291
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Conclusion: Combined surgery procures early visual rehabilitation and protects the patient from the second cataract surgery.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Purpose: To compare combined surgery and separate surgery in eyes coexisting with cataract and vitreoretinal pathology.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Materials and Methods: 60 patients (61 eye) charts are reviewed retrospectively forming two groups; coexisting with cataract and vitreoretinal pathology which had combined or separate surgery between 2004-2011.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Conclusion: Combined surgery procures early visual rehabilitation and protects the patient from the second cataract surgery.
🔬Design:Review & Systematic Survey
📍Scope:2004-2011 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Purpose: To compare combined surgery and separate surgery in eyes coexisting with cataract and vitreoretinal pathology. Materials and Methods: 60 patients (61 eye) charts are reviewed retrospectively forming two groups; coexisting with cataract and vitreoretinal pathology which had combined or separate surgery between 2004-2011. The patients preoperative, postoperative 1’sth month and last visit best corrected visual acuity is registered in snellen test and translated to logMAR test. Patients preoperative and postoperative refractions spherical equivalent are recorded. Results: We inserted 30 eyeses of 30 patient which had combined surgery in the first group and 31 eyeses of 30 patients which had separate surgery in in second group. 1’sth grupes mean preoperative vision is 1.34±0.96 (3-0.8) logMAR, post-operative 1’sth month vision is 1.38±0.96 (3-0.8) logMAR and the last visit vision is 0.92±0.75 (3-0.8). 2’nd grupes mean preoperative vision is 1.48±0.87 (3-0.8) logMAR, postoperative 1’sth month vision is 0.81±0.86 (3-0.8) logMAR and the last visit vision is 0.69±0.81 (3-0.8) logMAR. There was no significant relation between two grups visions (p=0.055). In 1’sth grup 18 (60.0%) eyeses vision improved, 8 (26.7%) eyeses vision decreased, 4 (13.3%) eyses vision didn’t changed at the last visit. In 2’nd grup 24 (80%) eyeses vision improved, 2 (6.7%) eyeses vision decreased, 4 (13.3%) eyses vision didn t changed at the last visit. Conclusion: Combined surgery procures early visual rehabilitation and protects the patient from the second cataract surgery.

Özet

Amaç: Katarakta eşlik eden retina hastalığı olan olgularda aynı seansta ve ayrı seanslarda uygulanan girişimlerin karşılaştırılmasıdır. Gereç ve Yöntem: Katarakta eşlik eden retina hastalığı olan olgularda aynı seansta ve ayrı seanslarda katarakt cerrahisi ve retina cerrahisi uygulanmış olan 60 hastanın 61 gözünün dosyaları iki grup oluşturularak retrospektif tarandı. Çalışmaya alınan olguların preoperatif, postoperatif 1. ay ve son kontrollerindeki en iyi düzeltilmiş görme keskinlikleri snellen eşeline göre kaydedilip logmar eşeline çevrildi. Tüm hastaların preoperatif ve postoperatif refraksiyon değerlerinin sferik ekivalan ları alınıp kaydedildi. Bulgular: Hastalardan iki grup oluşturuldu. 1. gruba aynı seansta katarakt ve retina cerrahisi yapılan 30 hastanın 30 gözü alındı, 2. gruba farklı zamanlarda önce retina cerrahisi daha sonra katarakt cerrahisi yapılan 30 hastanın 31 gözü alındı. 1. grubun preoperatif ortalama vizyonu 1.34±0.96 (3-0.8) logMAR, postoperatif 1. ay vizyonu 1.38±0.96 (3-0.8) log-MAR, son kontroldeki vizyonu 0.92±0.75 (3-0.8) logMAR’idi. 2. grubun preoperatif ortalama vizyonu 1.48±0.87 (3-0.8) log-MAR, postoperatif 1.ay vizyonu 0.81±0.86 (3-0.8) logMAR, son kontroldeki vizyonu 0.69±0.81 (3-0.8) logMAR idi. İki grubun son vizyonları arasında anlamlı bir fark yoktu (p=0.055). 1. grupta son kontrollerinde görmesi artan hastaların sayısı 18 (%60.0), görmesi azalan hastaların sayısı 8 (%26.7) ve görmesi değişmeyen hastaların sayısı 4 (%13.3) idi. 2. grupta son kontrollerinde görmesi artan hastaların sayısı 24 (%80), görmesi azalan hastaların sayısı 2 (%6.7) ve değişmeyen hastaların sayısı 4 (%13.3) idi. Tartışma: Kombine cerrahi vitrektomi sonrası ikinci katarakt cerrahi girişiminden hastayı koruyabilmekte ve erken vizüel rehabilitasyonun sağlanmasına izin verebilmektedir.

🔖

Cite This Article

LİMON, U., GÖZÜM, N. (2013). To compare combined surgery and separate surgery in eyes coexisting with cataract and vitreoretinal pathology. Retina-Vitreus, Cilt: 21 - Sayı: 4, 287–291. https://ajindex.com/articles/305053

References (1)

  1. Leaming DV. Practice styles and preferences of ASCRS members-1994 survey. J Cataract Refract Surg 1995;21:378-85. 2.Melberg NS, Thomas MA. Nuclear sclerotic cataract after vitrectomy in patients younger than 50 years of age. Ophthalmology 1995;102:1466-71. 3.Blodi BA, Paluska SA. Cataract after vitrevtomy in young patients. Ophthalmology 1997;104:1092-95. 4.Rice TA, Michels RG. Long-term anatomic and functional results of vitrectomy for diabetic retinopathy. Am J Ophthalmol 1980;90:297-303. 5.Honjo M; Ogura Y. Surgical results of pars plana vitrectomy combined with phacoemulsification and intraocular lens implantation for complications proliferative diabetic retinopathy. Ophthalmic Surgery and Lasers 1998;29:99-105. 6.Girard P, Saade G. A triple procedure: Phacoemulcification, intraoculer lens implantation, and scleral bucking surgery. Retina 1997;17:6-7. 7.Lahey JM, Francis RR, Kearney JJ, et al. Combining phacoemul-sification and vitrectomy in patients with proliferative diabetic retinopathy. Ophthalmology 2004;15:192-6. 8.Maria A, John M. Combined phacoemulsification, intraocular lens implantation, and vitrectomy for eyes with coexisting cataract and vitreoretinal pathology. Am J Ophthalmol 2003;135:291-6. 9.Zeng Jun, Sima P, and Karl W. Results of combined vitreoretinal surgery and phacoemulsification with intraocular lens implantation. Ophthalmology 2001;29:307-11. 10.Etuş H, Karabaş L,Altıntaş Ö, ve ark. Proliferatif diabetik retinopatili olgularda kombine fako-pars plana vitrektomi cerrahisi sonuçlarımız. Ret-Vit 2006;14:269-74. 11.Gürelik G, Konuk O, Önol M, ve ark. Arka segment cerrahileri ile kombine fakoemülsifikasyon uygulamaları. Ret-Vit 2001; 9:50-7. 12.Song W, Kim S, Lee S. Refractive status and visual acuity changes after oil removal in eyes following phacovitrectomy, intraocular lens implantation, and silicone oil tamponade. Can J Ophthalmol 2010;45:616-20. 13.Lahey JM, Francis RR, Kearney JJ, et al. Combining phacoemul-sification and vitrectomy in patients with proliferative diabeti-cretinopathy. Ophthalmology 2004;15:192-6. 14.Kim SH, Chung JW, Chung H, et al. Phacoemulsification and fold- able intraocular lens implantation combined with vitrectomy and silicone oil tamponade for severe proliferative diabetic retinopa- thy. J Cataract Refract Surg 2004;30:1721-6. 15.Scharwey K, Pavlovic S, Jacobi KW. Combined clear corneal phacoemulsification, vitreoretinal surgery, and intraocular lens implantation. J Cataract Refract Surg 1999;25:693-