Journals / Retina-Vitreus / 2020 / Cilt: 29 - Sayı: 4

Afl ibercept for Macular Edema Secondary to Branch Retinal Vein Occlusion: Two-Year Results

Pages
313–317
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

In the fi rst year, the mean number of injections was 5.9±1.2 whereas in the second year it was 2.1±0.9.Conclusion: These long-term real-life results suggest that the intravitreal afl ibercept is an effective treatment regimen for eyes with macular edema in BRVO.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Purpose: To investigate the two-year visual and anatomical outcomes of patients who had intravitreal afl ibercept monotherapy for macular edema due to branch retinal vein occlusion (BRVO).
📊
Key Findings & Data:Results: The mean ages of patients were 61.3±7.6 years.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:In the fi rst year, the mean number of injections was 5.9±1.2 whereas in the second year it was 2.1±0.9.Conclusion: These long-term real-life results suggest that the intravitreal afl ibercept is an effective treatment regimen for eyes with macular edema in BRVO.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Özet

Purpose: To investigate the two-year visual and anatomical outcomes of patients who had intravitreal afl ibercept monotherapy for macular edema due to branch retinal vein occlusion (BRVO). Methods: Twenty-nine eyes were included in this retrospective cohort study. All eyes were newly diagnosed as BRVO and were treated with intravitreal injections of afl ibercept. After three-months loading doses, patients were treated with a single dose of afl ibercepts if needed. The best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) and the central macular thickness (CMT) were recorded at each monthly visit. Results: The mean ages of patients were 61.3±7.6 years. The mean BCVA was 52.2±8.5 letters at baseline, 70.1±11.2 letters at the fi rst year (p<0.001), 69.7±12.5 letters at the second year (p<0.001). The mean CMT was 555±102 μm at baseline; 285±50 μm at the fi rst year (p<0.001), 270±52 μm at the second year (p<0.001). In the fi rst year, the mean number of injections was 5.9±1.2 whereas in the second year it was 2.1±0.9.Conclusion: These long-term real-life results suggest that the intravitreal afl ibercept is an effective treatment regimen for eyes with macular edema in BRVO.

🔖

Cite This Article

SIRAKAYA, E., KILIC, D. (2020). Afl ibercept for Macular Edema Secondary to Branch Retinal Vein Occlusion: Two-Year Results. Retina-Vitreus, Cilt: 29 - Sayı: 4, 313–317. https://ajindex.com/articles/304791

References (12)

  1. Rogers S, McIntosh RL, Cheung N, et al. The prevalence of retinal vein occlusion: pooled data from population studies from the United States, Europe, Asia, and Australia. Ophthalmology. 2010
  2. e1. doi:10.1016/j. ophtha.2009.07.017 2. Lashay A, Riazi-Esfahani H, Mirghorbani M, et al. Intravitreal Medications for Retinal Vein Occlusion: Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. J Ophthalmic Vis Res. 2019
  3. doi:10.18502/jovr.v14i3.4791 3. Babiuch AS, Han M, Conti FF, et al. Association of Disorganization of Retinal Inner Layers With Visual Acuity Response to Anti-Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor Therapy for Macular Edema Secondary to Retinal Vein Occlusion. JAMA Ophthalmol. 2019
  4. doi:10.1001/ jamaophthalmol.2018.4484 4. Ho M, Liu DTL, Lam DSC, et al. Retinal Vein Occlusions, From Basics to The Latest Treatment. Retina. 2016
  5. doi:10.1097/IAE.0000000000000843 5. Kaya F, Kocak I, Aydin A, et al. Comparison of Intravitreal Afl ibercept and Ranibizumab for Macular Edema Secondary to Branch Retinal Vein Occlusion. J RetVit. 2018
  6. Hoy SM. Afl ibercept: A Review in Macular Oedema Secondary to Branch Retinal Vein Occlusion. Drugs Aging. 2017
  7. doi:10.1007/s40266-017-0458-6. 7. Heier JS, Clark WL, Boyer DS, et al. Intravitreal afl ibercept injection for macular edema due to central retinal vein occlusion: two-year results from the COPERNICUS study. Ophthalmology. 2014
  8. e1. doi:10.1016/j. ophtha.2014.01.027 8. Brown DM, Heier JS, Clark WL, et al. Intravitreal afl ibercept injection for macular edema secondary to central retinal vein occlusion: 1-year results from the phase 3 COPERNICUS study. Am J Ophthalmol. 2013
  9. e7. doi:10.1016/j. ajo.2012.09.026 9. Spooner K, Hong T, Fraser-Bell S, et al. Current Outcomes of Anti-VEGF Therapy in the Treatment of Macular Oedema Secondary to Branch Retinal Vein Occlusions: A Meta-Analysis. Ophthalmol J Int d’ophtalmologie Int J Ophthalmol Zeitschrift fur Augenheilkd. 2019
  10. doi:10.1159/000497492 10. Holz FG, Roider J, Ogura Y, et al. VEGF Trap-Eye for macular oedema secondary to central retinal vein occlusion: 6-month results of the phase III GALILEO study. Br J Ophthalmol. 2013
  11. doi:10.1136/bjophthalmol-2012-301504 11. Sırakaya E, Küçük B, Ağadayı A. Afl ibercept Treatment for Macular Edema following Branch Retinal Vein Occlusion: Age-Based Responses. Ophthalmologica. 2020
  12. doi:10.1159/000502042 12. Clark WL, Boyer DS, Hei