Journals / Rekabet Dergisi / 2015 / Cilt: 16 - Sayı: 2

COMPETITION LAW INCLINATIONS IN THE INTERNET’S GROUND- BREAKING ENVIRONMENT AND INNOVATIVE DIGITAL MARKETS

İNTERNETİN EZBER BOZAN ORTAMINDA VE YENİLİKÇİ DİJİTAL PAZARLARDA REKABET HUKUKU EĞİLİMLERİ

Pages
43–109
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

The conclusion of this work has sumarized the current state of play of and the potential implications with respect to competition law practices on the internet

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Together with the growth of web-based businesses operating on the internet, the question of whether it would be appropriate to prefer competition law principles and parameters that are subjected to more flexible approaches has garnered importunity.
📊
Key Findings & Data:After explaining what the characteristics of internet and digital platforms are, this article has examined the following topics in light of the developments observed in the US and EU: i the approaches exhibited by antitrust authorities towards price fixing practices in Google’s and Apple’s e-books cases; ii the issue of dominance and its abuse in light of two distinct cases against Google; iii the competition authorities’ approaches towards internet-based companies’ merger and acquisition cases in relation to the Google/Motorola Mobility Inc. merger deal.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:The conclusion of this work has sumarized the current state of play of and the potential implications with respect to competition law practices on the internet
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:İnternet Ortamı · Dijital Platformlar · Google

Abstract

Together with the growth of web-based businesses operating on the internet, the question of whether it would be appropriate to prefer competition law principles and parameters that are subjected to more flexible approaches has garnered importunity. After explaining what the characteristics of internet and digital platforms are, this article has examined the following topics in light of the developments observed in the US and EU: i the approaches exhibited by antitrust authorities towards price fixing practices in Google’s and Apple’s e-books cases; ii the issue of dominance and its abuse in light of two distinct cases against Google; iii the competition authorities’ approaches towards internet-based companies’ merger and acquisition cases in relation to the Google/Motorola Mobility Inc. merger deal. The conclusion of this work has sumarized the current state of play of and the potential implications with respect to competition law practices on the internet

Özet

Teşebbüslerin internet ortamındaki faaliyetlerinin hızla yayılmasıyla birlikte, bu faaliyetlerde, rekabet hukuku ilke ve parametrelerini geleneksel yaklaşım yerine, daha esnek bir değerlendirmeyle ele alan uygulama yöntemlerini tercih etmenin doğru olup olmayacağı sorusunun önemi artmıştır.Bu çalışmada internet ortamı ve dijital platformların özelliklerinin neler olduğu açıklandıktan sonra Amerika Birleşik Devletleri ve Avrupa Birliği ülkelerindeki gelişmeler ışığında, şu konular incelenmiştir: i Özellikle Google’ın ve Apple’ın elektronik kitap uygulamaları hakkında açılan soruşturmalarda rekabet otoritelerinin benimsediği yaklaşım çerçevesinde, teşebbüslerarası anlaşmalardaki fiyat tespitleri; ii Google hakkında yürütülmüş olan iki soruşturma ışığında, internet ortamında oluşan pazarlarda hâkim durum ve kötüye kullanılması meselesi; iii Google/Motorola Mobility Inc. işlemi bağlamında, rekabet otoritelerinin, internet ortamında faaliyet gösteren teşebbüslerin birleşme-devralma işlemleri hakkındaki yaklaşımı. Çalışmanın sonuç kısmında internet ortamındaki teşebbüs faaliyetleri bakımından rekabet hukukunda gelinen nokta özetlenmiş ve olası açılımlar hakkında önerilerde bulunulmuştur

🔖

Cite This Article

GÜRKAYNAK, G., GÜRZUMAR, D. D. (2015). COMPETITION LAW INCLINATIONS IN THE INTERNET’S GROUND- BREAKING ENVIRONMENT AND INNOVATIVE DIGITAL MARKETS. Rekabet Dergisi, Cilt: 16 - Sayı: 2, 43–109. https://ajindex.com/articles/302707

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (11)

  1. Akademik Çalışmalar ALEXANDROV, A., G. DELTAS ve D.F. SPULBER (2011), “Competition and Antitrust in Two-Sided Markets”, Journal of Competition Law and Economics, Vol. 7, s. 775-812.
  2. ARMSTRONG, M. (2006), “Competition in Two-Sided Markets”, RAND Journal of Economics, Vol. 37, s. 668-691.
  3. BADUR, E. (2001), “Rekabet Hukukunda Fiyat Sınırlamaları”, Rekabet Dergisi, Sayı 7. CAILLAUD, B. ve B. JULLIEN (2003),”Chicken and Egg: Competition Among Intermediation Service Providers”, RAND Journal of Economics, Vol. 34, s. 309- 328. CARLTON, D. ve J. PERLOFF (2005),
  4. Modern Industrial Organization, Fourth Edition, R.R.Donnelley & Sons Co., USA. ÇETİNKAYA, M. (2003), İlgili Pazar Kavramı ve İlgili Pazar Tanımında Kullanılan Nicel Teknikler, 1. Dönem Uzmanlık Tezi, Rekabet Kurumu Yayınları,
  5. Ankara,
  6. Türkiye. EBLEN, C.C. (2004), “Defining the Geographic Market in Modern Commerce: The Effect of Globalization and E-Commerce on Tampa Electric and Its Progeny”, 56 Baylor L. Rev. 49. ELHAUGE, E: (2009), “Framing the Antitrust Issues in the Google Books Settlement”, Competition Policy International, GCP: The Antitrust Chronicle, Sayı 2 http://www.law.harvard.edu/faculty/elhauge/pdf/Elhauge%20Framing%20 the%20Issues%20in%20the%20Google%20Books%20Settlement%20CPI%20 article.pdf, Erişim Tarihi: 19.03.2016.
  7. ELHAUGE, E: (2010), “Why the Google Books Settlement is Procompetitive”, Journal of Legal Analysis, Cilt 2, Sayı 1. EVANS, D.S. (2003), “The Antitrust Economics of Multi-Sided Platform Markets”, Yale Journal on Regulation, Vol. 20, s. 325-381.
  8. EVANS, D.S. (2008), “Antitrust Issues Raised by the Emerging Global Internet Economy”, 102 Nw. U. L. Rev. Colloquy 285. EVANS, D.S. (2012), “Two-Sided Markets”, Amerikan Barolar Birliği Rekabet Hukuku Bölümü (der.), Market Definition In Antitrust: Theory And Case Studies içinde, http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=1396751, Erişim Tarihi: 19.03.2016.
  9. FILISTRUCCHI, L., D. GERADIN ve A.P., VAN DAMME (2014), “Market Definition in Two-Sided Markets: Theory and Practice”, Journal of Competition Law and Economics, Vol. 10, No. 2, s. 293-340.
  10. FRASER, E.M. (2010), “Antitrust and the Google Books Settlement: The Problem of Simultaneity”, Stan. Tech. L. Rev. Cilt 4. FRISCHMANN, B. (2009), “Google Books and the Essential Facilities Doctrine”, Madisonian.net, http://madisonian.net/2009/02/15/google-books-and- the-essential-facilities-doctrine/, Erişim Tarihi: 19.03.2016.
  11. GERADIN, D., C. AHLBORN, V. DENICOLÒ ve A.J. PADILLA (2006), “DG Comp