Journals / Perinatoloji Dergisi / 2005 / Cilt: 13 - Sayı: 4

Misoprostol for second and third-trimester labor induction in women with previous cesarean delivery

Eski sezaryenli kadınlarda II. ve III. trimesterde misoprostolle doğum indüksiyonu: Prospektif kontrollü çalışma

Pages
203–207
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Conclusion: In second and third trimester labor induction, the use of misoprostol in women with previous cesarean delivery was not associated with an excess of complications, side effects and cesarean delivery rates.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Objective: To evaluate the use of misoprostol in second and third trimester labor induction in women with previous cesarean delivery.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Methods: Women with previous cesarean delivery and normal controls seen for second and third trimester labor induction were randomly assigned to receive either misoprostol vaginally 50 μg or 100 μg every 6 hours until active phase of labor achieved.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Conclusion: In second and third trimester labor induction, the use of misoprostol in women with previous cesarean delivery was not associated with an excess of complications, side effects and cesarean delivery rates.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Sezaryen · Doğum · uyarılmış

Abstract

Objective: To evaluate the use of misoprostol in second and third trimester labor induction in women with previous cesarean delivery. Methods: Women with previous cesarean delivery and normal controls seen for second and third trimester labor induction were randomly assigned to receive either misoprostol vaginally 50 &#956;g or 100 &#956;g every 6 hours until active phase of labor achieved. Primary outcome measures were uterine rupture, induction-delivey interval, vaginal delivery at 24 hours. Statistical analysis was performed with the ANOVA for continous variables and the chi square and Fisher exact test for categorical variables. P<0.05 was considered significant. Results: Three hundred and twenty three were randomised, with 67 with prior cesarean section and 256 controls. The two groups were comparable with respect to gestational age, birth weight, preinduction cervical length and total misoprostol dose. The mean induction-delivery interval was significantly longer for the prior cesarean group (61.9 ± 7.71 hours vs 26.3 ± 1.45 hours, p<0.001). Significantly more women in the control group were delivered within 24 hours (p<0.001). No uterine rupture was detected in the previous cesarean group. Conclusion: In second and third trimester labor induction, the use of misoprostol in women with previous cesarean delivery was not associated with an excess of complications, side effects and cesarean delivery rates.

Özet

Amaç: Eski sezaryenli olgularda ikinci ve üçüncü trimesterde doğum indüksiyonu için misoprostol kullanımını değerlendirmek. Yöntem: Doğum indüksiyonu nedeniyle değerlendirilen eski sezaryenli ve uterin skarı bulunmayan kontrol grubu 50 ve 100 µg misoprostol dozları için randomize edildi. Doğumun aktif fazına kadar 6 saat arayla vagen arka forniksine 50 ya da 100 µg misoprostol tablet uygulandı. Olgular uterin rüptür, indüksiyon-doğum aralığı ve 24 saatte vaginal doğum gibi sonuçlar yönünden değerlendirildi. İstatistik analiz SPSS 10.0 programı ile sürekli değişkenler için ANOVA ve kategorik değişkenler için ki kare ve Fisher kesin olasılık testi ile yapıld, p<0.05 anlamlı olarak kabul edildi. Bulgular: 67'si eski sezaryenli 256'sı kontrol olmak üzere 323 gebe iki ayrı misoprostol dozu için randomize edildi. Her iki grup gebelik haftası, doğum ağırlığı, indüksiyon öncesi servikal uzunluk ve toplam misoprostol dozu açısından benzerdi. Ortalama indüksiyon-doğum aralığı eski sezaryenli olgularda belirgin olarak uzun bulundu (61.9 ± 7.71 saat; 26.3 ± 1.45 saat, p<0.001). 24 saat içinde doğum oranı kontrol grubundaki gebeler de anlamlı şekilde daha fazlaydı (p<0.001). Eski sezaryenli grupta uterin rüptür görülmedi. Sonuç: İkinci ve üçüncü trimesterde eski sezaryenli olgularda misoprostol doğum indüksiyonu komplikasyon, yan etki ve sezaryen doğum oranları yönünden kontrol grubuna göre farklılık göstermemiştir. Ancak indüksiyon-doğum aralığı eski sezaryenli olgularda belirgin şekilde uzun bulunmuştur.

🔖

Cite This Article

ASLAN, H., CEBECİ, A., CEYLAN, Y. (2005). Misoprostol for second and third-trimester labor induction in women with previous cesarean delivery. Perinatoloji Dergisi, Cilt: 13 - Sayı: 4, 203–207. https://ajindex.com/articles/300378

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (14)

  1. Elsheikh A, Antsaklis A,Mesogitis S, Papantoniou N, Rodolakis A, Vogas E, et al. Use of misoprostol for the termination of the second trimester pregnancies. Arch Gynecol Obstet 2001; 265: 204-6
  2. Koç I. Increased cesarean section rates in Turkey. Eur J Contracept Reprod Health Care 2003; 8: 1-10
  3. Leitch CR, Walker JJ. The rise in cesarean section rate: the same indication with a lower treshold. Br J Obstet Gynecol 1998; 105: 621-6
  4. Kwon JS, Davies GAL, Mackenzie PV. A comparison of oral and vaginal misoprostol for induction of labor at term: a randomised trial. Br J Obstet Gyneacol 2001; 108: 23-6
  5. Has R, Batukan C, Ermiş H, Cevher E, Araman A, Kılıç G, İbrahimoğlu L. A comparison of 25 abd 50 mg vaginally administered misoprostol for preinduction cervical ripening and labor induction. Gynecol Obstet Reprod Med 2000; 6: 171-4
  6. Dickinson JE. Misoprostol for second-trimester pregnancy termination in women with a prior cesarean delivery. Obstet Gynecol 2005; 105: 352-6
  7. Daskalakis GJ, Mesogitis SA, Papantoniou NE, Moulopoulos GG, Papapanagiotou AA, Antsaklis AJ. Misoprostol for second trimester pregnancy termination in women with prior cesarean section. BJOG 2005; 112: 97-9
  8. Kayani SI,Alfirevic Z. Uterine rupture after induction labor in women with previous cesarean section. BJOG 2005; 112: 451-5
  9. Dodd J, Crowther C. Induction of labor for women with a previous cesarean birth: A systematic review of the literature. Aust N Z J Obstet Gyneacol 2004; 44: 392-5
  10. Aslan H, Unlu E, Agar M, Ceylan Y. Uterine rupture associated with misoprostol labor induction in women with previous cesarean delivery. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 2004; 113: 45-8
  11. Bebbington MW, Kent N, Lim K, Gagnon A, Delisle MF, Tessier F, Wilson D. A randomized controlled trial comparing two protocols for use of misoprostol in midtrimester pregnancy termination. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2002; 187: 853-7
  12. Boulot P, Hoffet M, Bachelard B. Late vaginal abortion after previous cesarean birth: potential for uterine rupture. Gynecol Obstet Invest 1993; 36: 87-90, 13. Wing DA, Lowett K, Paul RH. Disruption of prior uterine incision following misoprostol for labor induction in women with previous cesarean delivery. Obstet Gynecol 1998; 91: 828-30
  13. American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists. Vaginal birth after previous cesarean delivery. Washington: The College, 1998: 1-8. ACOG Practice Patterns Bulletin No. 2
  14. Lydon-Rochelle M, Holt VL, Easterling TR,