Journals / İzmir İktisat Dergisi / 2014 / Cilt: 29 - Sayı: 2

Elaboration Likelihood Model and an Analysis of the Contexts of Its Application

Ayrıntılandırma Olasılığı Modeli ve Uygulama Alanları

Pages
167–203
Publication Date
2014-12-23
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

The review provides valuable insights as it presents a holistic view of the model and the variables used in the model.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Elaboration Likelihood Model (ELM), which supports the existence of two routes to persuasion: central and peripheral routes, has been one of the major models on persuasion.
📊
Key Findings & Data:As the number of studies in the Turkish literature on ELM is limited, a detailed explanation of the model together with a comprehensive literature review was considered to be contributory for this gap.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:The review provides valuable insights as it presents a holistic view of the model and the variables used in the model.
🔬Design:Review & Systematic Survey
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:İkna · Ayrıntılandırma Olasılığı Modeli · Literatür Taraması

Abstract

Elaboration Likelihood Model (ELM), which supports the existence of two routes to persuasion: central and peripheral routes, has been one of the major models on persuasion. As the number of studies in the Turkish literature on ELM is limited, a detailed explanation of the model together with a comprehensive literature review was considered to be contributory for this gap. The findings of the review reveal that the model was mostly used in marketing and advertising researches, that the concept most frequently used in elaboration process was involvement, and that argument quality and endorser credibility were the factors most often employed in measuring their effect on the dependant variables. The review provides valuable insights as it presents a holistic view of the model and the variables used in the model.

Özet

İkna kavramını açıklayan önemli modellerden biri, ikna sürecinde merkezi ve çevresel ikna yolu olmak üzere iki süreç bulunduğunu savunan Ayrıntılandırma Olasılığı Modeli’dir. Türkçe yazında modeli kapsamlı bir şekilde ele alan bir çalışmaya rastlanılmamış olması dolayısıyla, modelin detaylı anlatımını ve modelle ilgili literatür taramasını içeren çalışmanın bu konuda bir boşluğu doldurduğu düşünülmektedir. Yapılan literatür taraması bulguları modelin en fazla pazarlama ve reklam alanlarındaki çalışmalarda kullanıldığını; ayrıntılandırma olasılığını etkileme düzeyi açısından en fazla sayıda araştırmaya konu olan özelliğin ilgilenim olduğunu; ayrıntılandırma sürecinde yer alan ve etkisi en fazla sayıda araştırmada ele alınan faktörlerin ise iddia gücü ve kaynak inanılırlığı olduğunu ortaya koymuştur. Yapılan tarama, modelin ve modelde yer alan değişkenlerin kullanımının bütüncül olarak görülmesine imkân vermesi açısından faydalı bilgiler sunmaktadır.

🔖

Cite This Article

KIYMALIOĞLU, A. (2014). Elaboration Likelihood Model and an Analysis of the Contexts of Its Application. İzmir İktisat Dergisi, Cilt: 29 - Sayı: 2, 167–203. https://ajindex.com/articles/30037

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (14)

  1. AMICHAI-HAMBURGER, Y., MIKULINCER, M., ZALTS, N. (2003), “The Effects of Learned Helplessness on The Processing of a Persuasive Message”, Current Psychology, 22, 1, 37-46.
  2. ANDREWS, L. W., GUTKIN, T. B. (1994), “Influencing Attitudes Regarding Special-Class Placement Using A Psychoeducational Report - An Investigation of The Elaboration Likelihood Model”, Journal of School Psychology, 32, 4, 321-337.
  3. ARENI, C. S. (2003), “The Effects of Structural and Grammatical Variables on Persuasion: An Elaboration Likelihood Model Perspective”, Psychology and Marketing, 20, 4, 349-375.
  4. BITNER, M. J., OBERMILLER, C. (1985), “The Elaboration Likelihood Model: Limitations and Extensions in Marketing”, Advances in Consumer Research, Vol. 12, Issue 1, 420-425.
  5. BORDIA, P., DIFONZO, N., HAINES, R., CHASELING, E. (2005), “Rumors Denials as Persuasive Messages: Effects of Personal Relevance, Source, and Message Characteristics”, Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 35, 6, 1301-1331.
  6. BRADLEY, S. D., MEEDS, R. (2004), “The Effects of Sentence-Level Context, Prior Word Knowledge, and Need For Cognition on Information Processing of Technical Language in Print Ads”, Journal of Consumer Psychology, 14, 3, 291-302. BRIÑOL, P., PETTY, R. E., TORMALA, Z. L. (2004), “Self-Validation of Cognitive Responses to Advertisements”, Journal of Consumer Research, 30, 4, 559-573.
  7. CHAIKEN, S., LIBERMAN, A., EAGLY, A. H. (1989), “Heuristic and Systematic Information Processing Within and Beyond the Persuasion Context”, Unintended Thought, (Eds. James S. Uleman ve John A. Bargh) (s. 212-252).
  8. Guliford Press,
  9. New York. CHANG, C. (2002), “Self-Congruency as a Cue in Different Advertising-Processing Contexts”, Communication Research, 29, 503-536.
  10. CHEBAT, J., FILIATRAULT, P., PERRIEN, J. (1990), “Limits of Credibility - The Case of Political Persuasion”, Journal of Social Psychology, 130, 2, 157-167.
  11. CHOU, H., LIEN, N., LIANG, K. (2011), “The Antecedents and Belief-Polarized Effects of Thought Confidence”, Journal of Psychology, 145, 5, 481-506.
  12. CHRISTENSEN, T. P., ASCIONE, F. J., BAGOZZI, R. P. (1997), “Understanding How Elderly Patients Process Drug Information: A Test of a Theory of Information Processing”, Pharmaceutical Research, 14, 11, 1589-1596.
  13. COLE, C., ETTENSON, R., REINKE, S., SCHRADER, T. (1990), “The Elaboration Likelihood Model (ELM): Replications, Extensions and Some Conflicting Findings”, Advances in Consumer Research, 17, 231-236.
  14. COOK, A. J., MOORE, K., STEEL, G. D. (2004), “The Takin