Journals / Perinatoloji Dergisi / 2017 / Cilt: 25 - Sayı: 1

Extraperitoneal versus transperitoneal cesarean section: a retrospective analysis

Ekstraperitoneal ve transperitoneal sezaryen doğum: Retrospektif analiz

Pages
38–42
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Decreased postoperative pain, need for analgesic drugs and early intestinal activity are seems to be the potential benefits of the technique

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Objective: We aimed to compare the extraperitoneal versus transperitoneal cesarean section techniques.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Methods: We analyzed 34 patients who underwent extraperitoneal cesarean section and 34 patients who underwent transperitoneal cesarean section performed by only one operator in a single institution and compared both methods regarding operation duration, delivery time, nausea or vomiting during operation, postoperative shoulder pain, need for nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs and opioid analgesics during the operation day and the first postoperative day, first flatus time, and mean reduction in hemoglobin values.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Decreased postoperative pain, need for analgesic drugs and early intestinal activity are seems to be the potential benefits of the technique
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Objective: We aimed to compare the extraperitoneal versus transperitoneal cesarean section techniques. Methods: We analyzed 34 patients who underwent extraperitoneal cesarean section and 34 patients who underwent transperitoneal cesarean section performed by only one operator in a single institution and compared both methods regarding operation duration, delivery time, nausea or vomiting during operation, postoperative shoulder pain, need for nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs and opioid analgesics during the operation day and the first postoperative day, first flatus time, and mean reduction in hemoglobin values. Results: Half of the patients in the transperitoneal cesarean section group had nausea and vomiting during the operation and 58% of the patients had shoulder pain postoperatively. None of the patients in the extraperitoneal cesarean section group had nausea or vomiting during the operation and shoulder pain postoperatively. First flatus occurred significantly earlier in the extraperitoneal cesarean section group. Reduction in hemoglobin levels and need of analgesic drugs were higher in the transperitoneal cesarean group. Conclusion: Extraperitoneal cesarean section is a safe technique which can be carried out by experienced operators. Decreased postoperative pain, need for analgesic drugs and early intestinal activity are seems to be the potential benefits of the technique

Özet

Amaç: Bu çalışmada ekstraperitoneal ve transperitoneal sezaryen operasyonu geçiren olgula karşılaştırması amaçlanmıştır. Yöntem: Aynı kurumda tek operatör tarafından gerçekleştirilmiş olan 34 ekstraperitoneal sezaryen operasyonu olgusu ve 34 transperitoneal sezaryen operasyonu olgusu retrospektif olarak incelendi. Her iki grup operasyon süresi, doğum zamanı, operasyon sırasında bulantı ve kusma, postoperatif omuz ağrısı, operasyon günü ve postoperatif 1. gün nonsteroid antienşamatuar ilaç ve analjezik ihtiyacı, ilk gaz çıkarma zamanı ve hemoglobin değerlerindeki düşme ortalamasına göre karşılaştırıldı. Bulgular: Transperitoneal sezaryen grubu olan hastaların yarısında operasyon sırasında bulantı ve kusma mevcuttu. Postoperatif olarak bu hastaların %58’inde omuz ağrısı vardı. Ekstraperitoneal sezaryen operasyonu sırasında bulantı ve kusmaya rastlanmaz iken postoperatif hiçbir hastada omuz ağrısı gözlenmedi. Ekstraperitoneal sezaryen operasyonu grubunda ilk gaz çıkış süresi belirgin olarak daha erkendi. Hemoglobin seviyelerindeki düşme ve postoperatif analjezik ihtiyacı transperitoneal sezaryen operasyonu grubunda daha fazla idi. Sonuç: Ekstraperitoneal sezaryen tekniği deneyimli operatörler tarafından güvenle uygulanabilen bir tekniktir. Azalmış postoperatif ağrı ve analjezik ihtiyacı, erken intestinal aktivite bu tekniğin olası faydalarıdır.

🔖

Cite This Article

YEŞİLBAŞ, C., ERENEL, H. (2017). Extraperitoneal versus transperitoneal cesarean section: a retrospective analysis. Perinatoloji Dergisi, Cilt: 25 - Sayı: 1, 38–42. https://ajindex.com/articles/300327

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (6)

  1. Tappauf C, Schest E, Reif P, Lang U, Tamussino K, Schoell W. Extraperitoneal versus transperitoneal cesarean section: a prospective randomized comparison of surgical morbidity. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2013;209:338.e1–8. Chou CY, Liang PC, Chen CA, Lee CN. Cervical abscess with vaginal fistula after extraperitoneal cesarean section. J Formos Med Assoc 2007;106:1048–51.
  2. Mokgokong ET, Crichton D. Extraperitoneal lower segment cesarean section for infected cases: a reappraisal. S Afr Med J 1974;48:788–90. Aminov RI. A brief history of the antibiotic era: lessons learned and challenges for the future. Front Microbiol 2010; 1:134. Federation of Obstetrics and Gynecological Societies of India (FOGSI). Do’s and dont’s in obstetrics and gynecology practice. New Delhi: Jaypee Brothers; 2012.
  3. Hofmeyr JG, Novikova N, Mathai M, Shah A. Techniques for cesarean section. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2009;201:431–44.
  4. Martin JA, Hamilton BE, Ventura SJ, Osterman MJ, Kirmeyer S, Mathews TJ, et al. Births: final data for 2009. Natl Vital Stat Rep 2011;60:1–70.
  5. Li JJ, Corey EJ (editors). Drug discovery. Practices, processes and perspectives. Hoboken, NY: John Wiley & Sons; 2013. p. 27. Hofmeyr GJ, Mathai M, Shah A, Novikova N. Techniques for caesarean section. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2008;(1): CD004662. Dahlke JD, Mendez-Figueroa H, Rouse DJ, Berghella V, Baxter JK, Chauhan SP. Evidence-based surgery for cesarean delivery: an updated systematic review. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2013;209:294–306.
  6. Vogel JP, Betrán AP, Vindevoghel N, Souza JP, Torloni MR, Zhang J, et al.; WHO Multi-Country Survey on Maternal and Newborn Health Research Network. Use of the Robson classification to assess caesarean section trends in 21 countries: a secondary analysis of two WHO multicountry surveys. Lancet Global Health 2015;3:e260–70.