Journals / Perinatoloji Dergisi / 2019 / Cilt: 27 - Sayı: 2

Fetal conotruncal heart anomalies: is fourchamber view sufficient in the prenatal screening?

Fetal konotrunkal kalp anomalileri: Prenatal taramada dört oda görünümü yeterli mi?

Pages
113–118
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

It was found that four-chamber view was abnormal in only 27.7% of the cases.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Objective: In this study, we aimed to assess the factors leading to the diagnosis of conotruncal heart anomaly in the prenatal period by reviewing the records of the cases which were diagnosed with the conotruncal heart anomaly in our perinatology unit, and to raise the awareness of the diagnosis of prenatal conotruncal heart anomaly.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Methods: The referral reasons, the presence of concomitant non-cardiac anomaly and chromosomal anomaly, perinatal outcomes of the cases and the confirmation success of the diagnosis at postnatal period of the cases which were diagnosed with the conotruncal hearth anomaly at the Perinatology Unit of Kanuni Sultan Süleyman Training and Research Hospital between January 2015 and December 2016 were evaluated.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:It was found that four-chamber view was abnormal in only 27.7% of the cases.
🔬Design:Review & Systematic Survey
📍Scope:2015 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Objective: In this study, we aimed to assess the factors leading to the diagnosis of conotruncal heart anomaly in the prenatal period by reviewing the records of the cases which were diagnosed with the conotruncal heart anomaly in our perinatology unit, and to raise the awareness of the diagnosis of prenatal conotruncal heart anomaly. Methods: The referral reasons, the presence of concomitant non-cardiac anomaly and chromosomal anomaly, perinatal outcomes of the cases and the confirmation success of the diagnosis at postnatal period of the cases which were diagnosed with the conotruncal hearth anomaly at the Perinatology Unit of Kanuni Sultan Süleyman Training and Research Hospital between January 2015 and December 2016 were evaluated. Results: Among all congenital cardiac anomalies, the incidence of conotruncal heart anomaly was 20.4%. The termination of pregnancy was performed in 37 (36.6%) of 101 cases included in the study. Intrauterine fetal death was observed in 5 (5%) cases. Chromosomal anomaly and non-cardiac additional structural anomaly were found in 26.7% and 34.7% of the cases, respectively. Prenatal diagnosis was confirmed in 52 (88.1%) of 59 (58.4%) cases which born alive. It was found that four-chamber view was abnormal in only 27.7% of the cases. Conclusion: Three vessels (3V) and three vessels trachea (3VT) views should be displayed routinely in basic fetal cardiac screening in order to increase the prenatal diagnosis frequency of these anomalies as four-chamber view is mostly normal in conotruncal heart anomaly.

Özet

Amaç: Bu çalışmada hastanemiz perinatoloji ünitesinde konotrunkal kalp anomalisi tanısı alan olguların kayıtları incelenerek prenatal dönemde konotrunkal kalp anomalisi tanısına yönlendiren faktörlerin değerlendirilmesi ve prenatal konotrunkal kalp anomalisi tanısı ile ilgili farkındalığın artırılması amaçlandı. Yöntem: Ocak 2015 – Aralık 2016 tarihleri arasında Kanuni Sultan Süleyman Eğitim ve Araştırma Hastanesi Perinatoloji Ünitesinde konotrunkal kalp anomalisi tanısı alan olguların yönlendirilme nedenleri, eşlik eden kalp dışı anomali ve kromozom anomalisi varlığı, olguların perinatal sonuçları ve postnatal dönemde tanı- nın doğrulanma başarısı değerlendirildi. Bulgular: Tüm konjenital kalp anomalilerinin içinde konotrunkal kalp anomalisi sıklığı %20.4 idi. Çalışmaya dahil edilen 101 olgunun 37’sinde (%36.6) gebelik terminasyonu gerçekleştirildi. ‹ntrauterin fetal ölüm 5 (%5) olguda gözlendi. Olguların %26.7’sinde kromozom anomalisi ve %34.7’sinde kalp dışı ek yapısal anomali saptandı. Canlı doğan 59 (%58.4) olgunun 52’sinde (%88.1) prenatal tanı doğrulandı. Olguların yalnızca %27.7’sinde dört oda görünümünün anormal olduğu saptandı. Sonuç: Dört oda görünümünün konotrunkal kalp anomalilerinde sıklıkla normal olması nedeni ile bu anomalilerin prenatal tanı sıklığı nın artırılabilmesi için temel fetal kardiyak tarama programları nda üç damar ve üç damar trakea kesitleri rutin olarak görüntülenmelidir.

🔖

Cite This Article

KAYA, B., AÇAR, D. K., TAYYAR, A., BORNAUN, H., AYYILDIZ, P., POLAT, İ. (2019). Fetal conotruncal heart anomalies: is fourchamber view sufficient in the prenatal screening?. Perinatoloji Dergisi, Cilt: 27 - Sayı: 2, 113–118. https://ajindex.com/articles/300289

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (14)

  1. Hutson MR, Kirby ML. Neural crest and cardiovascular development: a 20-year perspective. Birth Defects Res C Embryo Today 2003;69:2–13
  2. Hoffman JI, Kaplan S. The incidence of congenital heart disease. J Am Coll Cardiol 2002;39:1890–900
  3. Samanek M, Voriskova M. Congenital heart disease among 815,569 children born between 1980 and 1990 and their 15- year survival: a prospective Bohemia survival study. Pediatr Cardiol 1999;20:411–7
  4. Galindo A, Mendoza A, Arbues J, Graneras A, Escribano D, Nieto O. Conotruncal anomalies in fetal life: accuracy of diagnosis, associated defects and outcome. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 2009;146:55–60
  5. Rustico MA, Benettoni A, D’Ottavio G, Maieron A, Fischer- Tamaro I, Conoscenti G, et al. Fetal heart screening in lowrisk pregnancies. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 1995;6:313–9
  6. Paladini D, Rustico M, Todros T, Palmieri S, Gaglioti P, Benettoni A, et al. Conotruncal anomalies in prenatal life. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 1996;8:241–6
  7. Sivanandam S, Glickstein JS, Printz BF, Allan LD, Altmann K, Solowiejczyk DE, et al. Prenatal diagnosis of conotruncal malformations: diagnostic accuracy, outcome, chromosomal abnormalities, and extracardiac anomalies. Am J Perinatol 2006;23:241–5
  8. Boudjemline Y, Fermont L, Le Bidois J, Fraisse A, Kachaner J, Villain E, et al. Prenatal diagnosis of conotruncal heart diseases. Results in 337 cases. [Article in French] Arch Mal Coeur Vaiss 2000;93:583–6
  9. Yoo SJ, Golding F, Jaeggi E. Ventricular outflow tract anomalies: so-called conotruncal anomalies. In: Yagel S, Silverman NH, Gembruch U, editors. Fetal cardiology. 2nd ed. New York, NY: Informa Healthcare; 2009. p. 305–27
  10. Aydemir NA, Güven MA, Bak›r ‹, Enç Y, Bilal MS. Importance of prenatal diagnosis in transposition of the great arteries: case report. Perinatal Journal 2007;15:68–72
  11. Vergani P, Mariani S, Ghidini A, Schiavina R, Cavallone M, Locatelli A, et al. Screening for congenital heart disease with the four-chamber view of the fetal heart. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1992;167:1000–3
  12. Gedikbasi A, Oztarhan K, Gul A, Sargin A, Ceylan Y. Diagnosis and prognosis in double-outlet right ventricle. Am J Perinatol 2008;25:427–34
  13. Bonnet D, Coltri A, Butera G, Fermont L, Le Bidois J, Kachaner J, et al. Detection of transposition of the great arteries in fetuses reduces neonatal morbidity and mortality. Circulation 1999;99:916–8
  14. Tzifa A, Barker C, Tibby SM, Simpson JM. Prenatal diagnosis of pulmonary atresia: impac