Journals / Perinatoloji Dergisi / 2020 / Cilt: 28 - Sayı: 2

The evaluation of the serum brain natriuretic peptide concentrations in preeclamptic and healthy pregnant women and its potential relationship with mean arterial blood pressure

Serum beyin natriüretik peptid konsantrasyonlarının preeklamptik ve sağlıklı gebe kadınlarda değerlendirilmesi ve ortalama arteryel kan basıncı

Pages
57–61
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Conclusion: We recommend further prospective studies with wider populations to assess whether BNP levels, which increase in preeclampsia, are associated with blood pressure levels or not.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Objective: In this study, we aimed to investigate the correlation between serum brain natriuretic peptide (BNP) concentrations and blood pressure levels by comparing serum brain natriuretic peptide (BNP) concentrations in preeclamptic and normotensive pregnant women and to assess its potential role in the preeclampsia pathogenesis.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Methods: A total of 48 preeclamptic and 39 normotensive patients were included in the study prospectively.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Conclusion: We recommend further prospective studies with wider populations to assess whether BNP levels, which increase in preeclampsia, are associated with blood pressure levels or not.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Objective: In this study, we aimed to investigate the correlation between serum brain natriuretic peptide (BNP) concentrations and blood pressure levels by comparing serum brain natriuretic peptide (BNP) concentrations in preeclamptic and normotensive pregnant women and to assess its potential role in the preeclampsia pathogenesis. Methods: A total of 48 preeclamptic and 39 normotensive patients were included in the study prospectively. Systolic diastolic and mean arterial blood pressure of the pregnant women were measured. Serum BNP concentrations were measured by enzyme immunoassay method. The variable differences between the groups were analyzed by independent samples t-test. Potential correlations between the variables were assessed by Pearson’s correlation analysis. Results: There was no difference between the groups in terms of age (26.18±11.49 years vs. 26.04±14.06 years), gestational age (31.59± 6.94 weeks vs. 30.17±5.72 weeks), parity (2.62±1.4 vs. 2.53±1.82) and body mass index (30.71±16.33 kg/m2 vs. 30.09±13.82 kg/m2 ) (p>0.05). Systolic (148.66± 61.82 mmHg vs. 126.44±97.47 mmHg; p=0.015), diastolic (81.19±52.25 mmHg vs. 97.29±14.27 mmHg; p=0.019) and mean arterial pressure (113.97±41.76 mmHg vs. 96.26±27.25 mmHg; p<0.001) levels were higher in the pregnant women complicated with preeclampsia. In addition, serum BNP concentrations were also higher in the preeclamptic pregnant women than the control group (139.42±62.19 pg/mL vs. 99.28± 19.32 pg/mL; p=0.028). BNP levels were significantly associated with only mean arterial pressure (β=0.241, p=0.037). Also, there was a significant positive correlation between BNP levels and mean arterial pressure (r=0.406, p=0.002). Conclusion: We recommend further prospective studies with wider populations to assess whether BNP levels, which increase in preeclampsia, are associated with blood pressure levels or not.

Özet

Amaç Bu çalışmada preeklamptik ve normotansif gebe kadınlar arasında serum beyin natriüretik peptid (BNP) konsantrasyonlarını kıyaslayarak bu olgulardaki kan basıncı değerleri ile arasındaki ilişkinin incelenmesi ve preeklampsi patogenezindeki olası yerinin değerlendirilmesi amaçlandı. Yöntem 48 preeklamptik ve 39 normotensif gebe kadın prospektif olarak çalışmaya dahil edildi. Gebelerin sistolik diastolik ve ortalama arteryel kan basınçları saptandı. Serum BNP konsantrasyonları enzim immunoassay yöntemi ile ölçüldü. Gruplar arasındaki değişkenlerin farklılıkları bağımsız örnekler t testi ile incelendi. Değişkenler arasındaki olası birliktelikler ise Pearson’un korelasyon analizi ile değerlendirildi. Bulgular Gruplar arasında yaş (26.18±11.49 yıla karşılık 26.04±14.06 yıl), gestasyonel yaş (31.59±6.94 haftaya karşılık 30.17±5.72 hafta), parite (2.62±1.4’e karşılık 2.53±1.82) ve vücut kitle indeksi (30.71±16.33 kg/m2’ye karşılık 30.09±13.82 kg/m2) yönünden farklılık bulunmuyordu (p>0.05). Sistolik (148.66±61.82 mmHg’ya karşılık 126.44±97.47 mmHg; p=0.015), diastolik (81.19±52.25 mmHg’ya karşılık 97.29±14.27 mmHg; p=0.019) ve ortalama arteryel basınç (113.97±41.76 mmHg’ya karşılık 96.26±27.25 mmHg; p<0.001) preeklampsi ile komplike gebe kadınlarda daha yüksekti. İlave olarak serum BNP konsantrasyonları da preeklamptik gebe kadınlarda kontrol grubuna kıyasla daha yüksek saptandı (139.42±62.19 pg/mL’ye karşılık 99.28±19.32 pg/mL; p=0.028). BNP düzeyleri sadece ortalama arteryel basınç ile anlamlı düzeyde birliktelik gösteriyordu (b=0.241, p=0.037). Ayrıca BNP düzeyleri ile ortalama arteryel basınç arasında anlamlı pozitif korelasyon bulundu (r=0.406, p=0.002). Sonuç Daha geniş prospektif çalışmalarda preeklampside artış gösteren BNP düzeylerinin kan basıncı değerleri ile birliktelik gösterip göstermediğinin değerlendirilmesi önerilir.

🔖

Cite This Article

YÜCEDAĞ, M., YILMAZ, Ö., KIRTEKE, K., ÖZBAY, P. Ö., KÜME, T. (2020). The evaluation of the serum brain natriuretic peptide concentrations in preeclamptic and healthy pregnant women and its potential relationship with mean arterial blood pressure. Perinatoloji Dergisi, Cilt: 28 - Sayı: 2, 57–61. https://ajindex.com/articles/300286

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (13)

  1. Yu Z, Wang J, Zhang P, Ding W. Ulinastatin attenuates vascular endothelial cell damage in pregnant women with severe preeclampsia. An Acad Bras Cienc 2019;91:e20180746
  2. Jia K, Ma L, Wu S, Yang W. Serum levels of complement factors C1q, Bb, and H in normal pregnancy and severe preeclampsia. Med Sci Monit 2019;25:7087–93
  3. Ye L, Shi MD, Zhang YP, Zhang JS, Zhu CR, Zhou R. Risk factors and pregnancy outcomes associated with retinopathy in patients presenting with severe preeclampsia: a retrospective cohort study. Medicine (Baltimore) 2020;99:e19349
  4. Ghomian N, Vakilian F, Shahri B, Rostaminejad V, Khadem- Rezaiyan M. Can brain natriuretic peptide predict cardiovascular complications in severe preeclampsia? A case-control study. Int J Reprod Biomed (Yazd) 2019;17(4). pii: ijrm.v17i4.4552
  5. Borges VTM, Zanati SG, Peraçoli MTS, Poiati JR, Romão- Veiga M, Peraçoli JC, et al. Maternal left ventricular hypertrophy and diastolic dysfunction and brain natriuretic peptide concentration in early- and late-onset pre-eclampsia. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2018;51:519–23
  6. Ying W, Catov JM, Ouyang P. Hypertensive disorder of pregnancy and future maternal cardiovascular risk. J Am Heart Assoc 2018;7:e009382
  7. Zhang X, Li Y, Wang Y, Hu K, Tu R, Zhang H, et al. Contribution of serum lipids as effect modifiers to a relationship disease in heart and coronary between mean arterial pressure Chinese rural population: the Henan Rural Cohort Study. BMJ Open 2019;9:e029179
  8. Afshani N, Moustaqim-Barrette A, Biccard BM, Rodseth RN, Dyer RA. Utility of B-type natriuretic peptides in preeclampsia: a systematic review. Int J Obstet Anesth 2013;22:96–103
  9. Resnik JL, Hong C, Resnik R, Kazanegra R, Beede J, Bhalla V, et al. Evaluation of B-type natriuretic peptide (BNP) levels in normal and preeclamptic women. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2005; 193:450–4
  10. Tihtonen KM, Koobi T, Vuolteenaho O, Huhtala HS, Uotila JT. Natriuretic peptides and hemodynamics in preeclampsia. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2007;196:328.e1–7
  11. Rafik Hamad R, Larsson A, Pernow J, Bremme K, Eriksson MJ. Assessment of left ventricular structure and function in preeclampsia by echocardiography and cardiovascular biomarkers. J Hypertens 2009;27:2257–64
  12. Malhamé I, Hurlburt H, Larson L, Poppas A, Nau C, Bourjeily G, et al. Sensitivity and specificity of B-type natriuretic peptide in diagnosing heart failure in pregnancy. Obstet Gynecol 2019;134:440–9
  13. Tanous D, Siu SC, Mason J, Greutmann M, Wald RM, Parker