SavedAdd your journal

Journals / İzmir İktisat Dergisi / 2015 / Cilt: 30 - Sayı: 2

Does Education Affect Economic Growth in Turkey? A Causality Analysis

Türkiye’de Eğitim Ekonomik Büyümeyi Etkiliyor mu? Nedensellik Analizleriyle Bir İnceleme

Süleyman YURTKURAN
Harun TERZİ
Pages
19–38
Publication Date
2015-12-25
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Econometric findings imply that there is one-way (positive) causality from the economic growth to the number of students completing university and one-way (positive) causality from the number of students completing vocational high school and the number of students completing high school to the economic growth.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:This study attempts to examine empirically the relations between economic growth and education for Turkey in the period from 1950 through 2012 by using Standard Granger causality, Hsiao version of Granger causality and Dolado-Lütkepohl VAR causality analyses.
📊
Key Findings & Data:This study attempts to examine empirically the relations between economic growth and education for Turkey in the period from 1950 through 2012 by using Standard Granger causality, Hsiao version of Granger causality and Dolado-Lütkepohl VAR causality analyses.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Econometric findings imply that there is one-way (positive) causality from the economic growth to the number of students completing university and one-way (positive) causality from the number of students completing vocational high school and the number of students completing high school to the economic growth.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:2012 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Türkiye · Büyüme · Eğitim

Abstract

This study attempts to examine empirically the relations between economic growth and education for Turkey in the period from 1950 through 2012 by using Standard Granger causality, Hsiao version of Granger causality and Dolado-Lütkepohl VAR causality analyses. Econometric findings imply that there is one-way (positive) causality from the economic growth to the number of students completing university and one-way (positive) causality from the number of students completing vocational high school and the number of students completing high school to the economic growth.

Özet

Bu çalışmada ekonomik büyüme ve eğitim arasındaki ilişkiler Standart Granger nedensellik, Hsiao’nun Granger nedensellik ve Dolado-Lütkepohl VAR nedensellik yöntemleriyle 1950-2012 dönemi Türkiye ekonomisi için ampirik yönden incelenmiştir. Ekonometrik analizler, ekonomik büyümeden yükseköğretim mezunu sayısına; meslek lisesi ve genel lise mezun sayısından ekonomik büyümeye doğru pozitif bir nedenselliğin olduğunu göstermektedir.

🔖

Cite This Article

YURTKURAN, S., TERZİ, H. (2015). Does Education Affect Economic Growth in Turkey? A Causality Analysis. İzmir İktisat Dergisi, Cilt: 30 - Sayı: 2, 19–38. https://ajindex.com/articles/30009

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (15)

  1. AFŞAR, M. (2009), “Türkiye’de Eğitim Yatırımları ve Ekonomik Büyüme İlişkisi”, Anadolu Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, 9 (1), 85-98.
  2. AFZAL, M., MALIK, M. E., BEGUM, I., SARWAR, K., FATIMA, H. (2012), “Relationship among Education, Poverty and Economic Growth in Pakistan: An Econometric Analysis”, Journal of Elementary Education, 22(1), 23-45.
  3. AKA, B., DUMONT, J. C. (2008), “Health, Education and Economic Growth: Testing for Long Run Relationships and Causal Links”, Applied Econometrics and International Development, 8(2), 101-113.
  4. ALTINTAŞ, H., ÇETİNTAŞ, H. (2011), “Türkiye’de Ekonomik Büyüme, Beşeri Sermaye ve İhracat Arasındaki İlişkilerin Ekonometrik Analizi: 1970-2005”, Erciyes Üniversitesi İİBF Dergisi, 34 (36), 33-56.
  5. AY, A., YARDIMCI, P. (2008), “Türkiye’de Beşeri Sermaye Birikimine Dayalı AK Tipi İçsel Ekonomik Büyümenin VAR Modeli ile Analizi (1950-2000)”, Maliye Dergisi, 155, Temmuz-Aralık, 5-14.
  6. BABALOA, S. J. (2011), “Long-Run Relationship between Education and Economic Growth: Evidence from Nigeria”, International Journal of Humanities and Social Science, 1(14), 2-5.
  7. BAL, H., ALGAN, N., MANGA, M., KANDIR, E. (2014), “Beşeri Sermaye ve Ekonomik Büyüme İlişkisi: BRICS Ülkeleri Türkiye Örneği”, International Conference on Eurasian Economies, 5-8.
  8. BARRO, R. J. (1998), Human Capital and Growth in Cross-Country Regression, Harvard University Press,
  9. Manuscript BECKER, S. G. (1964), Human Capital: A Theoretical and Empirical Analysis, with Special Reference to Education, New York: National Bureau of Economic Research, Columbia University Press.
  10. BECKER, S. G. (1992), “Education, Labor Force Quality, and the Economy: The Adam Smith Address”, Business Economics, 27 (1), 7-12.
  11. BENHABIB, J., SPIEGEL, M. (1994), “The Role of Human Capital in Economic Development: Evidence from Aggregate Cross-country Data”, Journal of Monetary Economics, 43, 143-174.
  12. BEŞKAYA, A., SAVAŞ, B., ŞAMİLOĞLU, F. (2010), "Türkiye'de Eğitimin Ekonomik Büyümeye Etkisi-The Impact of Education on Economic Growth in Turkey", Süleyman Demirel Üniversitesi İİBF Dergisi, 15 (3), 19-42.
  13. CHAUDHARY, A. R., IQBAL, A. (2009), “The Nexus between Higher Education and Economic Growth: An Empirical Investigation for Pakistan”, Pakistan Journal of Commerce and Social Sciences 3(1), 1-9.
  14. ÇAKMAK, E., GÜMÜŞ, S. (2003), “Türkiye'de Beşeri Sermaye ve Ekonomik Büyüme: Ekonometrik bir Analiz (1960-2002)”, Ankara Üniversitesi SBF Dergisi 60 (1), 6-12.
  15. ÇALIŞKAN, Ş., KARABACAK, M., MEÇİK, O. (2013), “Tür