SavedAdd your journal

Journals / İzmir İktisat Dergisi / 2017 / Cilt: 32 - Sayı: 1

Analyzing the Best- and Worst-Paid Occupations: A Case of Turkey

En Çok ve En Az Kazandıran Meslekler Analizi: Türkiye Örneği

Meltem INCE YENİLMEZ
Mehmet Hulusi DEMİR
Pages
243–269
Publication Date
2017-07-13
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

An integral part of the research is the assessment of the gross monthly wage dependence on a particular employee’s occupation.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:The level of remuneration is indicative for the labour market in terms of an objective assessment of the value of work done.
📊
Key Findings & Data:This paper deals with the 2011‒2014 wage distribution trends of the best-paid and worst-paid occupations divided according to TUIKEUROSTAT-OECD classification.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:An integral part of the research is the assessment of the gross monthly wage dependence on a particular employee’s occupation.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:2011 Verileri
⚙️Variables:En Çok Kazandıran Meslekler · En Az Kazandıran Meslekler · Aylık Brüt Ücret

Abstract

The level of remuneration is indicative for the labour market in terms of an objective assessment of the value of work done. The wage level and behaviour play an indisputable role in the economy of every country. This paper deals with the 2011‒2014 wage distribution trends of the best-paid and worst-paid occupations divided according to TUIKEUROSTAT-OECD classification. The three highest- and lowest-paid jobs from each occupational group are identified. Twenty-four wage distributions have been analysed. An integral part of the research is the assessment of the gross monthly wage dependence on a particular employee’s occupation.

Özet

Ücret düzeyi, işgücü piyasasında yapılmış bir işin değerini objektif olarak ölçmek için kullanılan bir göstergedir. Ücret düzeyi ve davranışın her ülke ekonomisinde rolü tartışılmazdır. Bu makalede, Türkiye İstatistik Kurumu, Avrupa İstatistik Ofisi, Ekonomik Kalkınma ve İşbirliği Örgütünün sınıflandırmasına göre belirlenmiş en çok ve en az kazandıran mesleklerde 2010-2014 dönemine ait ücret dağılım eğilimleri ele alınmaktadır. Araştırmanın değişkeni, Türk Lirası ( ) olarak ödenen aylık brüt ücrettir. Araştırmada yirmi dört ücret dağılımı incelenmiştir. Ücret düzeyinde farklılıklar ve iki mesleki grup arasında farklılaşma görülmüştür. Aylık brüt ücretin belirli bir çalışanın mesleğine bağımlılığının değerlendirilmesi araştırmanın ayrılmaz bir parçasını oluşturmaktadır.

🔖

Cite This Article

YENİLMEZ, M. I., DEMİR, M. H. (2017). Analyzing the Best- and Worst-Paid Occupations: A Case of Turkey. İzmir İktisat Dergisi, Cilt: 32 - Sayı: 1, 243–269. https://ajindex.com/articles/29973

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (6)

  1. ALANIZ, E., GINDLING, T. H., TERRELL, K. (2011). “The Impact of Minimum Wages on Wages, Work and Poverty in Nicaragua”, IZA Discussion paper series, No. 5702: 1-47.
  2. BALTAGİ, B.H., BAŞKAYA, Y.S., HULAGU, T. (2011). “The Turkish Wage Curve: Evidence from the Household Labor Force Survey”, Working Paper 1106: Research and Monetary Policy Department, Ankara: Central Bank of the Republic of Turkey. BATTISTI, M., FELBERMAYR, G.J., PERI, G., POUTVAARA, P. (2014). “Immigration, Search, and Redistribution: A Quantitative Assessment of Native Welfare”, NBER Working Paper No. w20131. BRANUCKER, H., JAHN, E. (2011). “Migration and Wage-setting: Reassessing the Labor Market Effects of Migration”, Scandinavian Journal of Economics, 113(2): 286–317.
  3. CAI, H., CHEN, Y., ZHOU, L.A. (2010). “Income and Consumption Inequality in Urban China”, Economic Development and Cultural Change, 58: 385‒413. DAGUM, C. (1997). “A Systematic Approach to the Generation of Income Distribution Models”, Journal of Income Distribution, 6:105‒126. DEMİR, O. (2001). “Türkiye’de Kamu Açıkları ve Artış Sebepleri”, D.E.Ü. İİBF Dergisi, 16(2):11-30.
  4. EUROSTAT(2015). Labour Market and Labour force survey (LFS) Statistics European Union Labour Force Survey - Annual Results 2015.
  5. EVANGELISTA DE CARVALHO FILHO, I. (2012). “Household Income as a Determinant of Child Labor and School Enrollment in Brazil: Evidence from a Social Security Reform”, Economic Development and Cultural Change, 60:399‒435. FIDRMUC, J., SENAJ, M. (2014). “Income, Schooling and Housing Wealth during Economic Reforms, Finance a úvěr”, 64: 160‒176. FIELDS, G.S. (2010). “Does Income Mobility Equalize Longer-term Incomes? New Measures of an Old Concept”, Journal of Economic Inequality, 8: 409-427.
  6. GHOSHEH, N. (2013). “Wage protection legislation in Africa”, Conditions of Work and Employment Branch, Geneva: ILO. HASSAN, I. B., AZALİ, M., LEE, C. (2014). “Feldstein-Horioka Puzzle and International Capital Mobility in High Income Countries: A Pool Mean Group Approach”, Engineering Economics, 25: 480‒486. HUSSMANNS, R. (2004). Defining and Measuring Informal Employment, Geneva: International Labour Office. HUSSMANNS, R. (2005), “Measuring the informal economy: From Employment in the Informal Sector to Informal Employment”, ILO Working paper, No. 53. IMMERVOLL, H. (2007). “Minimum Wages, Minimum Labour Costs and the Tax Treatment of Low-Wage Employment”, IZA Discussion Paper, No. 2555. NORDMAN, C.I., ROUBAUD F. (2009). “Reassessing the Gender