SavedAdd your journal

Journals / İzmir İktisat Dergisi / 2017 / Cilt: 32 - Sayı: 2

The Relationship Between Political Instability and Macro Economic Performance in the Turkish Economy

Türkiye Ekonomisinde Politik İstikrarsızlık-Makro Ekonomik Performans İlişkisi

Selim ŞANLISOY
Mehmet ÇETİN
Pages
207–237
Publication Date
2017-12-04
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

In this study the direction of the causality between the political instability and macro economic performance will be determined by a macroeconomic performance index developed and by using econometric methods.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:The success achieved by the combination of economic sources in optimal rates in order to reach the specified targets can be defined as economic performance.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Following the nineties political instability took place more in the analysis of the macro economic performances of the states.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:In this study the direction of the causality between the political instability and macro economic performance will be determined by a macroeconomic performance index developed and by using econometric methods.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Makro Ekonomik Performans · Politik İstikrarsızlık · Türkiye Ekonomisi

Abstract

The success achieved by the combination of economic sources in optimal rates in order to reach the specified targets can be defined as economic performance. Following the nineties political instability took place more in the analysis of the macro economic performances of the states. The political instability can affect the macro economic performance through the expectations. However the problems experienced in the economic field can also create political instability. As a result, it is possible for a two-way causality to occur between these variables. In this study the direction of the causality between the political instability and macro economic performance will be determined by a macroeconomic performance index developed and by using econometric methods.

Özet

Ekonomik kaynakların belirlenmiş makro ekonomik hedeflere ulaşılması amacıyla optimal oranlarda bir araya getirilerek kullanılması sonucunda elde edilen başarı, makro ekonomik performans olarak tanımlanabilir. 1990’lı yıllardan itibaren ülkelerin ekonomik performanslarının analizinde politik istikrarsızlık kendisine daha fazla yer bulmuştur. Politik istikrarsızlık, beklentiler üzerinden ilgili birimlerin makro ekonomik performanslarını etkileyebilmektedir. Ancak makro ekonomik alanda yaşanan sorunlar da ülkelerde politik istikrarsızlık yaratabilmektedir. Sonuç olarak değişkenler arasında her iki yönde nedensellik ilişkisinin ortaya çıkması olasıdır. Bu çalışmada politik istikrarsızlık ile makro ekonomik performans değişkeni arasındaki nedensellik ilişkisinin yönü geliştirilen makro ekonomik performans endeksi ve ekonometrik yöntemlerle belirlenecektir.

🔖

Cite This Article

ŞANLISOY, S., ÇETİN, M. (2017). The Relationship Between Political Instability and Macro Economic Performance in the Turkish Economy. İzmir İktisat Dergisi, Cilt: 32 - Sayı: 2, 207–237. https://ajindex.com/articles/29954

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (16)

  1. Ahmed, M. U., Pulok, M. H. (2013), “The Role of Political Stability on Economic Performance: The Case Of Bangladesh”, Journal of Economic Cooperation & Development, 34 (3), 61-99.
  2. Alesina, A., Perotti, R. (1993), “Income Distribution, Political Instability, and Investment”, NBER Working Paper, No. w4486, 1-33.
  3. Alesina, A., Özler, S., Roubini, N., Swagel, P. (1996), “Political Stability and Economic Growth”, Journal of Economic Growth, 1(2), 189-21.
  4. Alesina, A., Weder, B. (1999), “Do Corrupt Governments Receive Less Foreign Aid”, NBER Working Paper Series, No. 7108, Cambridge, 1-42.
  5. Arslan, Ü. (2011), “Siyasi İstikrarsızlık ve Ekonomik Performans: Türkiye Örneği”, Ege Academic Review, 11(1), 73-80.
  6. Asteriou, D., Price, S. (2001), “Political Instability and Economic Growth: UK Time Series Evidence”, Scottish Journal of Political Economy, 48 (4), 383-399.
  7. Atukeren, E. (2011), “Granger-Nedensellik Sınamalarına Yeni Yaklaşımlar”, Atatürk Üniveristesi. İİBF Dergisi, 10. Ekonometri ve İstatistik Sempozyumu Özel Sayısı, 137-153. Berthélemy, J., Kauffmann, C., Renard, L., Wegner, L. (2000), “Political Instability, Political Regimes and Economic Performance in African Countries”, Draft Paper for African Economic Outlook, Paris, 1-23.
  8. Beşkaya, A. ve Manan, Ö. (2009), “Ekonomik Özgürlükler ve Demokrasi ile Ekonomik Performans Arasındaki İlişkinin Zaman Serileri ile Analizi: Türkiye Örneği”, ZKÜ Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, Cilt 5, Sayı 10, 47–76.
  9. Bienen, H.S., Londregan, J., Nicholas, V. W. (1993),
  10. Ethnicity, Leadership Succession, and Economic Development in Africa, Institute for Policy Reform, Washington, D.C. Breuss, F., Luptacık, M., Mahlberg, B. (2000), “How far away are the CEECs from the EU Economic Standards? A Data Envelopment Analysis of the Economic Performance of the CEECs”, IEF Working Paper, Nr. 35, 2-38.
  11. Brunetti, A., (2006), “Political Variables in Growth Regressions”, Volatility, Uncertainty, Instability and Growth, 117-135.
  12. Butkiewicz, J. L., Yanıkkaya, H. (2005), “Time-Consistent Polities and Growth in Developing Countries: An Empirical Analysis”, Working Papers 05-02,
  13. University of Delaware, Department of Economics, 1-25.
  14. Campos, N. F., Nugent, J.B. (2002), “Who is Afraid of Political Instability”, Journal of Development Economics, 67(1), 157-172.
  15. Chu, M. (2007), “Comparison Among Three Analytical Methods for Knowledge Communities Group Decision Analysis”, Expert Systems with Aplications, 33, 1011-1024.
  16. De Haan, J., Siermann, C. L. J. (1996), “Politica