Journals / Mikrobiyoloji Bülteni / 2005 / Cilt: 39 - Sayı: 2

Molecular identification of Candida albicans and Candida dubliniensis strains isolated from clinical samples

Klinik örneklerden izole edilen Candida albicans ve Candida dubliniensis suşlarının moleküler olarak tanımlanması

Pages
199–204
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

It can be concluded that PCR-RFLP method may be used for the differentiation of C.dubliniensis and C.albicans isolates in clinical samples.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Candida dubliniensis is a recently identified opportunistic pathogen, which has close phylogenetic relation with Candida albicans.
📊
Key Findings & Data:The aim of this study was the genotypic differentiation of 55 germ tube-positive Candida strains isolated from clinical specimens (30 blood, 25 throat swab specimens).
💡
Conclusion & Impact:It can be concluded that PCR-RFLP method may be used for the differentiation of C.dubliniensis and C.albicans isolates in clinical samples.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Polimorfizm · kesim parçacığı uzunluk · Genotip

Abstract

Candida dubliniensis is a recently identified opportunistic pathogen, which has close phylogenetic relation with Candida albicans. The aim of this study was the genotypic differentiation of 55 germ tube-positive Candida strains isolated from clinical specimens (30 blood, 25 throat swab specimens). The isolates were phenotypically identified by API ID 32C system, and genotypically identified by using poiymerase chain reaction-restriction fragment length polymorphism (PCR-RFLP) method. Initially ITS2 region has been amplified by using universal fungal primers with PCR. After amplification and purification of approximately 340 base pair products, they were treated with species-specific restriction enzymes (MspA1 I and BsmAI for C.albicans and C.dubliniensis, respectively). As a result, API ID 32C system identified 52 (94.5%) isolates as C.albicans and 3 (5.5%) isolates as C.dubliniensis, whereas PCR-RFLP analysis yielded 50 (90.9%) C.albicans and 5 (9.1%) C.dubliniensis. It can be concluded that PCR-RFLP method may be used for the differentiation of C.dubliniensis and C.albicans isolates in clinical samples.

Özet

Candida dubliniensis, son yıllarda tanımlanmış olan ve Candida albicans ile filogenetik yakınlığı bulunan fırsatçı bir patojendir. Bu çalışmada, klinik örneklerden (30 kan, 25 boğaz sürüntüsü) izole edilen ve germ tüp oluşturan 55 Candida susunun tanımlanması ve genotipik olarak ayırt edilmesi planlanmıştır. Bu amaçla, fenotipik ayrım API ID 32C sistemiyle, genotipik ayrım ise polimeraz zincir reaksiyonu-restriksiyon parça uzunluğu çeşitliliği (PCR-RFLP) yöntemiyle yapılmıştır. Önce PCR yöntemiyle mantar rRNA'sına özgül evrensel primerler kullanılarak ITS2 bölgesi çoğaltılmış, daha sonra elde edilen yaklaşık 340 baz çiftlik PCR ürünü sataştırılarak C.albicans için özgül MspA1 I, C.dubliniensis için özgül SsmAl enzimleriyle kesilmiştir. Sonuç olarak, API ID 32C sistemiyle izolatların 52'si (%94.5) C.albicans, 3'ü (%5.5)C.dubliniensis olarak belirlenirken, PZR-RFLP yöntemiyle izolatların 50'si (%90.9)C.albicans, 5'i (%9A)C.dubliniensis olarak tanımlanmıştır. Bulgularımız, klinik örneklerden izole edilen C.albicans ve C.dubliniensis suşlarının ayırt edilmesinde PCR-RFLP yönteminin kullanılabilir olduğunu göstermektedir.

🔖

Cite This Article

TORAMAN, Z. A., BULUT, Y., YILMAZ, M., ÖZDARENDELİ, A. (2005). Molecular identification of Candida albicans and Candida dubliniensis strains isolated from clinical samples. Mikrobiyoloji Bülteni, Cilt: 39 - Sayı: 2, 199–204. https://ajindex.com/articles/299019

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (14)

  1. Sullivan DJ, Westerneng TJ, Haynes KA, Bennett DE, Coleman DC: Candida dubliniensis sp. nov.:Phenotypic and molecular characterization of a novel species associated with oral candidosis in HIV-infected individuals. Microbiology 1995, 141: 1507-1521
  2. Brandt ME, Harrison LH, Pass M, et al: Candida dubliniensis fungemia: The first four cases in North America. Emerg Infect Dis 2000, 6: 46-49
  3. Barnes RA, Denning DW, Evans EG, et al: Fungal infections: A survey of laboratory services for diagnosis and treatment. Commun Disp Rep CDR Rev 1996, 6: 69-75
  4. Odds FC, Van Nuffel L, Dams G: Prevalence of Candida dubliniensis isolates in a yeast stock collection. J Clin Microbiol 1998, 36: 2869-2873
  5. Pinjon E, Sullivan D, Salkin I, Shanley D, Coleman D: Simple, inexpensive, reliable method for differentiation of Candida dubliniensis from Candida albicans. J Clin Microbiol 1998, 36: 2093-2095
  6. Al Mosaid A, Sullivan D, Salkin IF, Shanley D, Coleman, DC: Differentiation of Candida dubliniensis from Candida albicans on staib agar and caffeic acid-ferric citrate agar. J Clin Microbiol 2001,39: 323-327
  7. Xu J, Millar BC, Moore JE, et al: Comparison of API20C with molecular identification of Candida spp isolated from bloodstream infections. J Clin Pathol 2002, 55: 774-777
  8. Elie CM, Lott TJ, Reiss E, Morrison CJ: Rapid identification of Candida species with species-specific DNA probes. J Clin Microbiol 1998, 36: 3260-3265
  9. Park S, Wong M, Marras SA, et al: Rapid identification of Candida dubliniensis using a species-specific molecular beacon. J Clin Microbiol 2000, 38: 2829-2836
  10. Goodwin SD, Fiedler-Kelly DJ, Grasela TH, Schell WA, Perfect JR: A nationwide survey of clinical laboratory methodologies for fungal infections. J Med Vet Mycol 1992, 30: 153-160
  11. Stevens DA, Coleman DC, Sullivan, DJ: First report of Candida dubliniensis in the Middle East.J Clin Microbiol 2001, 39: 416-416
  12. Latouche GN, Daniel HM, Lee OC, Mitchell TG, Sorrell TC, Meyer W: Comparison of use of phenotypic and genotypic characteristics for identification of species of the anamorph genus Candida and related teleomorph yeast species. J Clin Microbiol 1997, 35: 3171-3180
  13. Rex JH, Rinaldi MG, Pfaller MA: Resistance ol Candida species to fiuconazoie. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 1995, 39: 1-8
  14. Cardenes-Perera CD, Torres-Lana A, Alonso-Vargas R, et al: Evaluation of API ID 32C and VITEK-2 to identify Candida dubliniensis. Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis 2004, 50: 219-221.