SavedAdd your journal

Journals / İzmir İktisat Dergisi / 2019 / Cilt: 34 - Sayı: 3

The Impacts of Ethical Leadership on the Employee Psychological Well-being: The Mediating Role of Interactional Justice

Etik Liderliğin Çalışanın Psikolojik İyi Oluşu Üzerindeki Etkileri: Etkileşimsel Adaletin Aracılık Rolü

Belgin BAHAR
Recep MİNGA
Pages
399–411
Publication Date
2019-09-30
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

The research was conducted with 290 participants working in the companies listed in the ISO 500 list.The results indicate that ethical leadership has a direct and positive relation to both interactional justice and employee well-being.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:This study examines the connection among ethical leadership, organizational justice, psychological well-being, as well as performance of employees.
📊
Key Findings & Data:The research was conducted with 290 participants working in the companies listed in the ISO 500 list.The results indicate that ethical leadership has a direct and positive relation to both interactional justice and employee well-being.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:The article concludes with an analysis of the theoretical and practical implications associated to the findings and recommendations of further research.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Etik liderlik · örgütsel adalet · etkileşim adaleti

Abstract

This study examines the connection among ethical leadership, organizational justice, psychological well-being, as well as performance of employees. The research was conducted with 290 participants working in the companies listed in the ISO 500 list.The results indicate that ethical leadership has a direct and positive relation to both interactional justice and employee well-being. It is also shown that that interactional justice act as a mediator for the relationship between ethical leadership and employee well-being,and also ethical leadership and performance. The article concludes with an analysis of the theoretical and practical implications associated to the findings and recommendations of further research.

Özet

Bu çalışma etik liderlik, örgütsel adalet, çalışanların psikolojik iyi oluşları ve performansları arasındaki bağlantıyı incelemektedir. Araştırma İSO 500 listesinde yer alan şirketlerde çalışan 290 katılımcıyla gerçekleştirilmiştir. Sonuçlar etik liderlik ile etkileşimsel adalet ve çalışanın psikolojik iyi oluşu arasında direkt ve pozitif bir ilişki olduğunu göstermektedir. Ayrıca etkileşimsel adaletin, etik liderlik ve çalışanların iyi oluş hali ile etik liderlik ve performans arasında aracılık rolü olduğunu da göstermiştir. Makale sonunda ilgili sonuçların teorik ve pratik etkilerinin analizine ve gelecek araştırmalara yönelik önerilere yer verilmektedir.

🔖

Cite This Article

BAHAR, B., MİNGA, R. (2019). The Impacts of Ethical Leadership on the Employee Psychological Well-being: The Mediating Role of Interactional Justice. İzmir İktisat Dergisi, Cilt: 34 - Sayı: 3, 399–411. https://ajindex.com/articles/29867

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (11)

  1. Adams, J. S. (1963). Towards an understanding of inequity. The Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 67(5), 422. Adams, J. S. (1965). Inequity in social exchange. In Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 2, pp. 267-299).
  2. Academic Press.
  3. Anderson, J. C., & Gerbing, D. W. (1988). Structural equation modeling in practice: A review and recommended two-step approach. Psychological bulletin, 103(3), 411. Arnold, K. A., Turner, N., Barling, J., Kelloway, E. K., & McKee, M. C. (2007). Transformational leadership and psychological well-being: The mediating role of meaningful work. Journal of Occupational Health Psychology, 12, 193–203.
  4. Bandura, A., & Walters, R. H. (1977). Social learning theory (Vol. 1). Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-hall. Brown, M. E., & Treviño, L. K. (2006). Ethical leadership: A review and future directions. The leadership quarterly, 17(6), 595-616.
  5. Brown, M. E., Treviño, L. K., & Harrison, D. A. (2005). Ethical leadership: A social learning perspective for construct development and testing. Organizational behaviour and human decision processes, 97(2), 117-134.
  6. Campbell, J. P. (1990), Modelling the performance prediction problem in industrial and organizational psychology. In M. D. Dunnette & L. M. Hough (Eds.), Handbook of industrial and organizational psychology (pp. 687-732).
  7. Palo Alto, CA, US: Consulting Psychologists Press.
  8. Chughtai, A., Byrne, M., & Flood, B. (2015). Linking ethical leadership to employee well-being: The role of trust in supervisor. Journal of Business Ethics, 128(3), 653-663.
  9. Colquitt, J. A., Conlon, D. E., Wesson, M. J., Porter, C. O., & Ng, K. Y. (2001). Justice at the millennium: a meta-analytic review of 25 years of organizational justice research. Journal of applied psychology, 86(3), 425. Çöl, G. (2011). Algılanan güçlendirmenin iş gören performansı üzerine etkileri. Doğuş Üniversitesi Dergisi, 9(1), 35-46.
  10. Dion, M. (2009). Les confusions entourant le «leadership éthique» dans les organisations. Éthique publique. Revue internationale d’éthique sociétale et gouvernementale, 11(2), 111-128.
  11. Donovan, M. A., Drasgow, F., & Munson, L. J. (1998). The perceptions of fair interpersonal treatment scale: Development and validation of a measure of interpersonal treatment in the workplace. Journal of Applied psychology, 83(5), 683. Fornell, C., & Wernerfelt, B. (1987). Defensive marketing strategy by customer complaint management: a theoretical analysis. Journal of Marketing research, 24(4), 337-346. Fornell,